Content deleted Content added
RachelBrown (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* '''Strong neutral'''. Unfortunately, I've had a real [[WP:V]] problem with [[List of Jewish jurists]] where some troublesome editors resist cleanup out of "ethnic pride" or "identity politics" motives. While I think this ''collection'' is notable, I'm starting to lean towards the opinion that categories provide slightly better encyclopedic standards, since editors of each independent page watch it, rather than allowing a couple of POV editors to list "as many names as possible" to push the idea that "people like me" are really groovy (whether or not, in these cases, the names listed are really Jewish; or such can be evidenced). [[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters]] 20:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC) |
* '''Strong neutral'''. Unfortunately, I've had a real [[WP:V]] problem with [[List of Jewish jurists]] where some troublesome editors resist cleanup out of "ethnic pride" or "identity politics" motives. While I think this ''collection'' is notable, I'm starting to lean towards the opinion that categories provide slightly better encyclopedic standards, since editors of each independent page watch it, rather than allowing a couple of POV editors to list "as many names as possible" to push the idea that "people like me" are really groovy (whether or not, in these cases, the names listed are really Jewish; or such can be evidenced). [[User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters|Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters]] 20:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. [[User:Edwardian|Edwardian]] 23:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. [[User:Edwardian|Edwardian]] 23:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
* '''Strong keep'''. As a Methodist, I have no interest to declare on this topic other than to make Wikipedia better. I prefer lists tocategories. Unfortunately, I've had a real problem with [[List of Jewish jurists]] where some troublesome editors resist the addition of names, however well documented. - [[User:RachelBrown|RachelBrown]] 23:20, 22 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:20, 22 November 2005
List of Jewish Recipients of National Medal of Science
We don't have other lists of Recipients of the National Medal of Science with ($ETHNIC|$NATIONAL) affiliation. Wikipedia isn't a vehicle to boost one's pride in one's ancestry. Pilatus 19:31, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete by the same reasoning as the vote about Muslim business leaders. Fairness demands consistency. It's sad to vote against a list that took real time and effort. My suggestion is to host the list privately. Durova 20:21, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons as all the others. This has disquieting tones of racism, and anyway it's listcruft. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 23:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete (sigh) same as always. EscapeArtistsNeverDie 23:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Nothing wrong with this list. --Vsion 00:39, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- As people are on a cleaning spree possibly you can just add religious or ethnic affiliation on the main List of National Medal of Science winners--T. Anthony 12:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Of course there is. Antidote 04:16, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- LOL! - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 00:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. LazarKr 07:48, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Being Jewish has only to do with being Jewish. Nothing else. Denni ☯ 03:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jews (2nd nomination), when if anyone delete, please tell my talk page. --User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg/sig 07:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - this is al very notable. - Londoneye 18:37, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Strong neutral. Unfortunately, I've had a real WP:V problem with List of Jewish jurists where some troublesome editors resist cleanup out of "ethnic pride" or "identity politics" motives. While I think this collection is notable, I'm starting to lean towards the opinion that categories provide slightly better encyclopedic standards, since editors of each independent page watch it, rather than allowing a couple of POV editors to list "as many names as possible" to push the idea that "people like me" are really groovy (whether or not, in these cases, the names listed are really Jewish; or such can be evidenced). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 20:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Edwardian 23:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep. As a Methodist, I have no interest to declare on this topic other than to make Wikipedia better. I prefer lists tocategories. Unfortunately, I've had a real problem with List of Jewish jurists where some troublesome editors resist the addition of names, however well documented. - RachelBrown 23:20, 22 November 2005 (UTC)