Stuartyeates (talk | contribs) delete |
Just Step Sideways (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:ACADEMIC]]; I could find no publications at all at Google Scholar. Fails [[WP:ANYBIO]] because being named one of the top 50 physicians in a given field by a magazine does not amount to a "well known or significant or award or honor"; magazines publish such lists all the time. Fails [[WP:GNG]] for lack of significant coverage by reliable sources; he is mentioned in the Pulse Magazine top-50 list, which got a little bit of press (BTW the Economic Times article and the Deccan Herald article cited above are the same article), but nothing close to [[WP:42|significant coverage by independent reliable sources]]. Basically he appears to be a successful, well-regarded physician in general practice; that's not enough for inclusion in an international encyclopedia. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 17:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:ACADEMIC]]; I could find no publications at all at Google Scholar. Fails [[WP:ANYBIO]] because being named one of the top 50 physicians in a given field by a magazine does not amount to a "well known or significant or award or honor"; magazines publish such lists all the time. Fails [[WP:GNG]] for lack of significant coverage by reliable sources; he is mentioned in the Pulse Magazine top-50 list, which got a little bit of press (BTW the Economic Times article and the Deccan Herald article cited above are the same article), but nothing close to [[WP:42|significant coverage by independent reliable sources]]. Basically he appears to be a successful, well-regarded physician in general practice; that's not enough for inclusion in an international encyclopedia. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 17:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as having insufficient in-dpeth coverage in independent third party sources to meet [[WP:GNG]]. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. [[User:Stuartyeates|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates|talk]]) 10:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:09, 13 September 2012
Krishna Kasaraneni
- Krishna Kasaraneni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I previously placed a WP:PROD on the rationale "Being Chair of BMA GPC GP trainees subcommittee and no. 36 on a list of leading GPs is insufficient to meet notability guidelines for biographies." The Prod was removed by the article creator along with the maintenance tags. Some media coverage for the subject can be found: Hindustan Times and Pulse, both mentioning the subject in that top-50 list, plus quotation in a Pulse article, but I think these fall short of WP:ANYBIO criteria so I am bringing this article to AfD on the same rationale as the earlier Prod. AllyD (talk) 18:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
This article has created a lot of ripples in the media in AP, India and hence I felt all the 4 members involved de meet the notability guidelines for biographies criteria. http://www.deccanherald.com/content/277106/4-indian-origin-doctors-among.html http://www.andhrajyothy.com http://www.eenadu.net/district/main.aspx?dsname=Guntur http://www.sakshi.com/Main/districtlistings.aspx?dist=17&Catid=3&activeid=5 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/nri/nris-in-news/4-indian-origin-doctors-among-uks-top-50/articleshow/16297584.cms
Being Chair of BMA GPC GP trainees subcommittee - a committee for 10,000 doctors which is significant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakkineni (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure if he exactly meets the WP:BIO guidelines but he is not far off and anyway meets my guidelines. Here is a more detailed article from Pulse. Note: after I looked at the Pulse article two or three times I was blocked until I could log in there. Thincat (talk) 20:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ACADEMIC; I could find no publications at all at Google Scholar. Fails WP:ANYBIO because being named one of the top 50 physicians in a given field by a magazine does not amount to a "well known or significant or award or honor"; magazines publish such lists all the time. Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage by reliable sources; he is mentioned in the Pulse Magazine top-50 list, which got a little bit of press (BTW the Economic Times article and the Deccan Herald article cited above are the same article), but nothing close to significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Basically he appears to be a successful, well-regarded physician in general practice; that's not enough for inclusion in an international encyclopedia. --MelanieN (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)