Content deleted Content added
Miami33139 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Kopete}}) |
:({{findsources|Kopete}}) |
||
This contested prod is not notable, the three references are all self-published by the author. No external links function as notability references. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 23:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC) |
This contested prod is not notable, the three references are all self-published by the author. No external links function as notability references. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 23:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep, for now''': So, if I spent some time digging through the 843 google news references to this software, and the 511 Google book references, the aggregate of these mentions could never equal notability? What did your [[WP:BEFORE]] due diligence show?--[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 01:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:18, 1 October 2009
Kopete
- Kopete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This contested prod is not notable, the three references are all self-published by the author. No external links function as notability references. Miami33139 (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)