Content deleted Content added
→[[Jet pack in popular culture]]: Removed my vote |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*'''Delete''' More culture cruft which violates WP:NOT and WP:TRIVIA and many more.--[[User:JForget|JForget]] 02:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' More culture cruft which violates WP:NOT and WP:TRIVIA and many more.--[[User:JForget|JForget]] 02:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' does not violate [[WP:NOT]], as the only advice that policy gives on trivia is to follow the [[WP:TRIVIA]] guideline, and citing that guideline as a reason to delete specifically contradicts [[WP:TRIVIA#What this guideline is not]]. There is no reason why this article cannot be cleaned up and made similar to [[Spiders in culture]], which was ''just'' kept per [[WP:SNOW]]. [[User:DHowell|DHowell]] 02:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' does not violate [[WP:NOT]], as the only advice that policy gives on trivia is to follow the [[WP:TRIVIA]] guideline, and citing that guideline as a reason to delete specifically contradicts [[WP:TRIVIA#What this guideline is not]]. There is no reason why this article cannot be cleaned up and made similar to [[Spiders in culture]], which was ''just'' kept per [[WP:SNOW]]. [[User:DHowell|DHowell]] 02:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep.''' AfD's are about '''topic notability''', not content quality. Please remember that. The article is currently in bad shape -- it's not even an article. But that has NOTHING TO DO WITH DELETION DISCUSSIONS. <div style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ffffff;padding:0 5px 1px 5px;">[[user:equazcion|Equazcion]] ([[User talk:equazcion|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|Contribs]])</div> 03:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:32, 7 September 2007
Jet pack in popular culture
- Jet pack in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete - another example of an editor splitting off an enormous list of trivia into its own dump article instead of just deleting it. As is pretty much always the end reuslt of such WP:BHTT splits, the resulting "popular culture" article is a directory of unassociated items. These things have absolutely nothing to do with one another beyond happening to have some sort of jet pack in them. This tells us nothing about jet packs, nothing about the fiction the jet packs appear in, nothing abot their relationships to each other (for there is none) and nothing about the real world. The instinct to clean this out of the main article was good and this should under no circumstances be merged back to it. In future let us hope that instead of saddling Wikipedia with these sorts of laundry lists editors will simply delete them. Until then, we'll have to settle for deleting this article. Otto4711 04:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This doesn't merit it's own article. There's hardly anything worth keeping and the remainder caneasily be merged into the Jet pack article. Other than James Bond, the Jet Pack hasn't been a focal point of anything in popular culture. Spawn Man 05:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not a notable enough topic to merit its own article. Gatoclass 05:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 05:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete get rid of the trivial - nothing is left. MarkBul 05:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, and it is just a list of trivia.Darkcraft 13:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, because it contains nice introduction paragraph with the image before listing the items, but it does need references, too. For example, consider this article. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- If it contains a nice intro paragraph, it should be merged then, Delete as unprosed trivia. Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 22:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as it is all trivial information Corpx 22:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think the sample reference given shows that references can be found for the individual items. Referenceable is the standard at WP. Things having the same theme or major plot element are of course related to each other, although apparently not everyone sees that as logical. DGG (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete More culture cruft which violates WP:NOT and WP:TRIVIA and many more.--JForget 02:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep does not violate WP:NOT, as the only advice that policy gives on trivia is to follow the WP:TRIVIA guideline, and citing that guideline as a reason to delete specifically contradicts WP:TRIVIA#What this guideline is not. There is no reason why this article cannot be cleaned up and made similar to Spiders in culture, which was just kept per WP:SNOW. DHowell 02:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)