Content deleted Content added
David Eppstein (talk | contribs) d |
Winged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs) // Edit via Wikiplus/Nope, how dare we delete it? |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 14:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 14:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. The single UK government source for this article (deleted for some reason in 2015) merely says that she was one of nearly 200 winners of the award that year. That's not enough, searching for matching information finds nothing relevant with any more detail, and with so little information there's no way to tell whether anyone else with a similar name who might have actually done something notable is really the same person. I'm not always against permastubs in general, but this one is no use. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 04:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. The single UK government source for this article (deleted for some reason in 2015) merely says that she was one of nearly 200 winners of the award that year. That's not enough, searching for matching information finds nothing relevant with any more detail, and with so little information there's no way to tell whether anyone else with a similar name who might have actually done something notable is really the same person. I'm not always against permastubs in general, but this one is no use. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 04:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
<!-- How can someone who has been awarded by the Queen be non-notable? Does she need to be awarded by the King? (Institutional misogyny, in play.) 200 or 20000 is not a matter of concern; the queen hardly honors every Tom, Dick and Harry. I feel that female-bio(s) are being selectively targeted and seek for a moratorium against deletion of female bio(s), unless and until, we do weed out all spam male bios. Obviously, I don't have any problem against deleting male subjects who have received the same award and did nothing else. ~~~ --> |
Revision as of 12:40, 4 May 2019
Jacqueline Frost
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jacqueline Frost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In light of the recent successful AfD for Pauline Barrett, I am nominating others who have received the same non-notability-establishing Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The single UK government source for this article (deleted for some reason in 2015) merely says that she was one of nearly 200 winners of the award that year. That's not enough, searching for matching information finds nothing relevant with any more detail, and with so little information there's no way to tell whether anyone else with a similar name who might have actually done something notable is really the same person. I'm not always against permastubs in general, but this one is no use. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)