Content deleted Content added
→Islam In South Asia: question |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Keep''' I agree that Islam in Southeast Asia has a number of significant differences from Islam elsewhere in the world. Because the academic sources cited in the article are about that specific topic, I would think that notability as a specific topic is sufficient. [[User:TechBear|<b style="color: green">TechBear</b>]] | [[User talk:TechBear|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TechBear|Contributions]] 00:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I agree that Islam in Southeast Asia has a number of significant differences from Islam elsewhere in the world. Because the academic sources cited in the article are about that specific topic, I would think that notability as a specific topic is sufficient. [[User:TechBear|<b style="color: green">TechBear</b>]] | [[User talk:TechBear|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TechBear|Contributions]] 00:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' Content of this article requires separate article. This article is not violating any wikipedia policy and should not be removed. Unnecessary AFD. --[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 06:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:01, 29 December 2018
Islam In South Asia
- Islam In South Asia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly WP:CFORK from numerous articles. Such CFORKs are completely unnecessary to have here. None of the sources treat this subject as the primary or important subject contrary to WP:SIGCOV. Also see past consensus at Talk:Islam in South Asia#Redirect revert and Talk:Islam in South Asia#Requests for comment (an RfC) where consensus was clear that this article should not be created. Lorstaking (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 28. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Clear WP:CFORK. I raised the issues at the talk page and was greeted with silence as the response. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Definitely passes WP:GNG. Scholarship treats Islam in South Asia as a stand alone subject. I see that the article author has also made use of excellent academic sources which treat the Islam in South Asia subject independently:
- Metcalf, Barbara D. (8 September 2009), Islam in South Asia in Practice, Princeton University Press, ISBN 1-4008-3138-5
- Kugle, Scott A. (2004), "Islam in South Asia", in Richard C. Martin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World: M-Z, index, Macmillan Reference USA, pp. 634–641, ISBN 978-0-02-865605-2
- Robinson, Francis (4 November 2010), "South Asia to 1919", The New Cambridge History of Islam, vol. Volume 5, The Islamic World in the Age of Western Dominance, Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–239, ISBN 978-1-316-17578-1
{{citation}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help) Code16 (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The issue is not about notability, but rather about duplication of content. Can you explain what this page will cover which is not covered in the Islam in India page (and Islam in Pakistan and Islam in Bangladesh as well)? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:17, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that Islam in Southeast Asia has a number of significant differences from Islam elsewhere in the world. Because the academic sources cited in the article are about that specific topic, I would think that notability as a specific topic is sufficient. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 00:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Content of this article requires separate article. This article is not violating any wikipedia policy and should not be removed. Unnecessary AFD. --Spasage (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)