FreeatlastChitchat (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Iran and Red and black colonization. (TW) |
FreeatlastChitchat (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Iran and Red and black colonization}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran and Red and black colonization|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 24#{{anchorencode:Iran and Red and black colonization}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iran_and_Red_and_black_colonization Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Iran and Red and black colonization}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran and Red and black colonization|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 24#{{anchorencode:Iran and Red and black colonization}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iran_and_Red_and_black_colonization Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Iran and Red and black colonization}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Iran and Red and black colonization}}) |
||
Fails [[WP:GNG]] as far as I can see. Yes this has been mentioned in books, but one or two lines in a book is not enough to warrant an article. [[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] ([[User talk:FreeatlastChitchat|talk]]) |
Fails [[WP:GNG]] as far as I can see. Yes this has been mentioned in books, but one or two lines in a book is not enough to warrant an article. As there are four editors who routinely team up whenever an Iran/Shia related article is brought to AFD I would like the closing admin to consider their age old arguments and the counter arguments on my part which I will just write here beforehand. These editors usually say "There are a lot of sources dude!". [[WP:LOTSOFSOURCES]] addresses this. This article is about a subject which has only trivial mentions, nothing more. Keep voters should show which source/s have enough material to write an encyclopedic article in a neutral tone. As per [[WP:TRIVIALCOVERAGE]] "The spirit and the letter of the guideline are concerned with having enough content to write articles from a neutral point of view". There is not enough material to even write a stub, let alone an article. [[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] ([[User talk:FreeatlastChitchat|talk]]) 07:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:10, 24 February 2016
Iran and Red and black colonization
- Iran and Red and black colonization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG as far as I can see. Yes this has been mentioned in books, but one or two lines in a book is not enough to warrant an article. As there are four editors who routinely team up whenever an Iran/Shia related article is brought to AFD I would like the closing admin to consider their age old arguments and the counter arguments on my part which I will just write here beforehand. These editors usually say "There are a lot of sources dude!". WP:LOTSOFSOURCES addresses this. This article is about a subject which has only trivial mentions, nothing more. Keep voters should show which source/s have enough material to write an encyclopedic article in a neutral tone. As per WP:TRIVIALCOVERAGE "The spirit and the letter of the guideline are concerned with having enough content to write articles from a neutral point of view". There is not enough material to even write a stub, let alone an article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)