Content deleted Content added
Coolabahapple (talk | contribs) added to a couple of afd lists. |
92.2.76.202 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|list of Medicine-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Medicine|list of Medicine-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''', When you look at the article's history it appears that Seraphimblade has removed much of the promotional stuff. What remains seems to be in line with the sentiment held at the last AfD which was kept. [[Special:Contributions/92.2.76.202|92.2.76.202]] ([[User talk:92.2.76.202|talk]]) 21:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:20, 12 October 2016
GeneCalling
AfDs for this article:
- GeneCalling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA (Special:Contributions/Mbeach14) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. Jytdog (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have no opinion at present about whether this should be kept or deleted, but must point out that the technology being far outdated is not a valid reason for, or contributory factor towards, deletion. We cover the history of science as well as current science. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, When you look at the article's history it appears that Seraphimblade has removed much of the promotional stuff. What remains seems to be in line with the sentiment held at the last AfD which was kept. 92.2.76.202 (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)