Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
TedEdwards (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''Redirect''' to [[Game of Thrones]][[User:Brocicle|Brocicle]] ([[User talk:Brocicle|talk]]) 12:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |
* '''Redirect''' to [[Game of Thrones]][[User:Brocicle|Brocicle]] ([[User talk:Brocicle|talk]]) 12:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep'''. Yes, the Emmy award does suggests that it has individual notability, and the title sequence has received widespread non-trivial media coverage, also parodied and adapted ([http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11894418], [http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/game-thrones-map-title-sequence-season-article-1.2227148], [https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/jan/25/transparent-to-game-of-thrones-how-tv-perfected-the-title-sequence], [http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/news/a46222/opening-credits-of-the-game-of-thrones-finale/], [https://au.be.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/a/36477872/hidden-detail-in-season-7-game-of-thrones-credits-contains-clue/], [https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/08/game-of-thrones-westworld-the-crown-opening-titles-elastic], [http://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/832445/Game-of-Thrones-season-7-Opening-credits-changed-White-Walker-warning-Stormborn-HBO], [http://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a10355400/game-of-thrones-opening-credits-clue/], [http://screenrant.com/game-of-thrones-white-walkers-wall-breach-theory/], [http://io9.gizmodo.com/5890410/watch-the-simpsons-game-of-thrones-intro], [http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/entertainment/2017/08/carpool-karaoke-goes-full-game-of-thrones-in-intro-for-sophie-turner-maisie-williams.html], [https://www.newyorker.com/news/sporting-scene/looking-ahead-to-the-english-premier-leagues-game-of-thrones] in addition to some already given above and many more). These two facts should qualified the article under notability criteria - there is no specific notability guideline for title sequence, although winning a major award and having non-trivial coverage in reliable sources are the usual notability criteria for articles on various media such as music, TV, film and other related subjects, see e.g. [[WP:NMEDIA]], [[WP:NMUSIC]], etc. The article however needs more sources, and it could be trimmed, but these are different issues not relevant here because the notability criteria have been satisfied. Whether other title sequences that won award also have their own articles or not is also irrelevant (there is for example one for [[The Simpsons opening sequence|The Simpsons]]), the notability of each article is judged on its own. It should be noted that [[WP:FANCRUFT]] is an essay and not Wikipedia policy or guideline, and reason for deletion should be discussed in reference to [[WP:DEL-REASON]] or [[WP:NOT]]. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 10:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
* '''Keep'''. Yes, the Emmy award does suggests that it has individual notability, and the title sequence has received widespread non-trivial media coverage, also parodied and adapted ([http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11894418], [http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/game-thrones-map-title-sequence-season-article-1.2227148], [https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/jan/25/transparent-to-game-of-thrones-how-tv-perfected-the-title-sequence], [http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/news/a46222/opening-credits-of-the-game-of-thrones-finale/], [https://au.be.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/a/36477872/hidden-detail-in-season-7-game-of-thrones-credits-contains-clue/], [https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/08/game-of-thrones-westworld-the-crown-opening-titles-elastic], [http://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/832445/Game-of-Thrones-season-7-Opening-credits-changed-White-Walker-warning-Stormborn-HBO], [http://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a10355400/game-of-thrones-opening-credits-clue/], [http://screenrant.com/game-of-thrones-white-walkers-wall-breach-theory/], [http://io9.gizmodo.com/5890410/watch-the-simpsons-game-of-thrones-intro], [http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/entertainment/2017/08/carpool-karaoke-goes-full-game-of-thrones-in-intro-for-sophie-turner-maisie-williams.html], [https://www.newyorker.com/news/sporting-scene/looking-ahead-to-the-english-premier-leagues-game-of-thrones] in addition to some already given above and many more). These two facts should qualified the article under notability criteria - there is no specific notability guideline for title sequence, although winning a major award and having non-trivial coverage in reliable sources are the usual notability criteria for articles on various media such as music, TV, film and other related subjects, see e.g. [[WP:NMEDIA]], [[WP:NMUSIC]], etc. The article however needs more sources, and it could be trimmed, but these are different issues not relevant here because the notability criteria have been satisfied. Whether other title sequences that won award also have their own articles or not is also irrelevant (there is for example one for [[The Simpsons opening sequence|The Simpsons]]), the notability of each article is judged on its own. It should be noted that [[WP:FANCRUFT]] is an essay and not Wikipedia policy or guideline, and reason for deletion should be discussed in reference to [[WP:DEL-REASON]] or [[WP:NOT]]. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 10:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
:* {{re|Hzh}} But once you remove all the tables, descriptions etc., it will have so little infomation it could easily be put on [[Game of Thrones]]. And Emmys do not equal notabilty; to my knowledge this is the only article on a title sequence. [[User:TedEdwards|<span style="color:green"><big>T</big><small>ed</small></span>]][[User talk:TedEdwards|<span style="color:orange"><big>E</big><small>dwards</small></span>]] 17:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:16, 4 September 2017
Game of Thrones title sequence
AfDs for this article:
- Game of Thrones title sequence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pretty much all fancruft unfortunately, especially tables, no notibility outside topic of Game of Thrones. Having an Emmy does not make this notable, otherwise every title sequence that has got the award deserves an article. TedEdwards 18:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The title sequence does seem to be well-covered, however. A simple Google search brought up numerous — very recent at that — articles about it. Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A ton of filler content and unnecessary tables. This is better suited for a wiki. sixtynine • speak up • 19:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:FANCRUFT -- Whats new?(talk) 08:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Possibly Merge to Game of Thrones; though I'm not sure any content needs to be added. Argument as per above; WP:FANCRUFT. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Game of ThronesBrocicle (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes, the Emmy award does suggests that it has individual notability, and the title sequence has received widespread non-trivial media coverage, also parodied and adapted ([12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] in addition to some already given above and many more). These two facts should qualified the article under notability criteria - there is no specific notability guideline for title sequence, although winning a major award and having non-trivial coverage in reliable sources are the usual notability criteria for articles on various media such as music, TV, film and other related subjects, see e.g. WP:NMEDIA, WP:NMUSIC, etc. The article however needs more sources, and it could be trimmed, but these are different issues not relevant here because the notability criteria have been satisfied. Whether other title sequences that won award also have their own articles or not is also irrelevant (there is for example one for The Simpsons), the notability of each article is judged on its own. It should be noted that WP:FANCRUFT is an essay and not Wikipedia policy or guideline, and reason for deletion should be discussed in reference to WP:DEL-REASON or WP:NOT. Hzh (talk) 10:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Hzh: But once you remove all the tables, descriptions etc., it will have so little infomation it could easily be put on Game of Thrones. And Emmys do not equal notabilty; to my knowledge this is the only article on a title sequence. TedEdwards 17:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)