m Signing comment by 172.56.17.157 - "→Eric the Prince: " |
96.237.20.21 (talk) I know I shouldn't remove material, but this "Eric the Prince" sockpupeteer is the master of those 2 accounts |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Keep.'''. Notable and all sourced have been checked. --[[User:Hatchmight|Hatchmight]] ([[User talk:Hatchmight|talk]]) 06:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep.'''. Notable and all sourced have been checked. --[[User:Hatchmight|Hatchmight]] ([[User talk:Hatchmight|talk]]) 06:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. Passes all major criteria but needs some rework and additional material. Tag for now. [[User:Choicerpex|Choicerpex]] ([[User talk:Choicerpex|talk]]) 06:05, 5 February 2016 (′UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Passes all major criteria but needs some rework and additional material. Tag for now. [[User:Choicerpex|Choicerpex]] ([[User talk:Choicerpex|talk]]) 06:05, 5 February 2016 (′UTC) |
||
*'''Keep.'''. Notable and it all checks out, glad to have him on Wikipedia. --[[User:weshouldworktogetherbecause|weshouldworktogetherbecause]] ([[User talk:weshouldworktogetherbecause|talk]]) |
|||
:<small class="afdnewuser-notice">{{user|weshouldworktogetherbecause||}} has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. <sub>└</sub><sup>'''[[User:UkPaolo| UkPaolo]]'''</sup>/<sub>''[[User Talk:UkPaolo|talk]]''</sub><sup>┐</sup> 07:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep.'''. looks good to me. --[[User:lifeguard5770|lifeguard5770]] ([[User talk:lifeguard5770|talk]]) |
|||
:<small class="afdnewuser-notice">{{user|lifeguard5770||}} has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. <sub>└</sub><sup>'''[[User:UkPaolo| UkPaolo]]'''</sup>/<sub>''[[User Talk:UkPaolo|talk]]''</sub><sup>┐</sup> 07:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Delete''' - the article currently makes no claim to meet [[WP:NMUSIC]] and I cannot find any sources that would help towards that, or towards [[WP:GNG]]. Editor(s) arguing in favour of keeping the article are invited to follow the link to [[WP:NMUSIC]] and explain <u>how</u> the person meets it. --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 08:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - the article currently makes no claim to meet [[WP:NMUSIC]] and I cannot find any sources that would help towards that, or towards [[WP:GNG]]. Editor(s) arguing in favour of keeping the article are invited to follow the link to [[WP:NMUSIC]] and explain <u>how</u> the person meets it. --''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 08:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:20, 5 February 2016
Eric the Prince
- Eric the Prince (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. An earlier revision of this article was nominated per CSD A7, however the creator has removed the tag and expanded the article greatly from the version nominated for speedy, thus why I am sending this to AfD over replacing the speedy tag. sandgemADDICT yeah? 02:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
As the creator I am asking that any discrpencies be put here, and the matter be resolved - anything that needs to be changed please let me know, I am creating Wikipedia's for about 150 independent artists around the country and this is the first one, my personal one, so please let me know EXACTLY what I need to do in order to make sure that absolutely none of the pages I post even get considered for "speedy deletion." Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RapAuthority (talk • contribs) 02:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. WP:COI piece, promotional intent. Article's author appears to be using two accounts now. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Make that three. 75.80.192.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) sixtynine • speak up • 06:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG completely with nothing found in a Google search. Edited out promotional content in the article anyway. sixtynine • speak up • 04:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep.. Notable and all sourced have been checked. --Hatchmight (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes all major criteria but needs some rework and additional material. Tag for now. Choicerpex (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2016 (′UTC)
- Delete - the article currently makes no claim to meet WP:NMUSIC and I cannot find any sources that would help towards that, or towards WP:GNG. Editor(s) arguing in favour of keeping the article are invited to follow the link to WP:NMUSIC and explain how the person meets it. --bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Clause #7 "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability."
Edits are being made that verify, a new update with cited sources will be added that match the criteria. Aloha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.17.157 (talk) 11:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)