Content deleted Content added
→DiskView: Keep |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Keep''' The very first hit I got in Google Books [http://books.google.com/books?id=F4Cw4ny6nNQC&q=%22DiskView%22] was ''Winternals Defragmentation, Recovery, and Administration Field Guide'' (ISBN 1597490792) which gives this topic ''significant'' coverage. Further searches turn up even more information. Hardly ''[[WP:JNN|not notable]]''. --[[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 18:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' The very first hit I got in Google Books [http://books.google.com/books?id=F4Cw4ny6nNQC&q=%22DiskView%22] was ''Winternals Defragmentation, Recovery, and Administration Field Guide'' (ISBN 1597490792) which gives this topic ''significant'' coverage. Further searches turn up even more information. Hardly ''[[WP:JNN|not notable]]''. --[[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 18:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] - lack of reliable sources. [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 19:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 25 July 2009
DiskView
- DiskView (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is not notable enough to be included on an wikipedia. I can't find much reference to it outside of download sites and the company website. There are no third party sources that discuss it. Rcurtis5 (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 01:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - lots of downloads sites but coverage in reliable sources are few. I found this which is a very brief mention. And this PC Mag review, although it so short I would hesitate to really call it a review. -- Whpq (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The very first hit I got in Google Books [1] was Winternals Defragmentation, Recovery, and Administration Field Guide (ISBN 1597490792) which gives this topic significant coverage. Further searches turn up even more information. Hardly not notable. --Tothwolf (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)