Content deleted Content added
Dwanyewest (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*'''Keep''' if a '''reliable source''' that shows that this is a '''notable episode''' can be found. '''Delete''' if '''no reliable source''' that shows that this is a notable episode can be found. [[User:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Powergate92</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Talk</font>]]</small> 04:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' if a '''reliable source''' that shows that this is a '''notable episode''' can be found. '''Delete''' if '''no reliable source''' that shows that this is a notable episode can be found. [[User:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Powergate92</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Powergate92|<font style="color:#fff;background:green;">Talk</font>]]</small> 04:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
** How many times have I told you that it's nigh impossible to find reliable sources about individual episodes of children's television shows?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 04:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
** How many times have I told you that it's nigh impossible to find reliable sources about individual episodes of children's television shows?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 04:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
*You do realise the onus is on a editor to prove what they are saying is true [[WP:PROVEIT]]. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.[1] All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article.[2] If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. [[User:Dwanyewest|Dwanyewest]] ([[User talk:Dwanyewest|talk]]) 05:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:05, 20 February 2010
Countdown to Destruction
- Countdown to Destruction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is a no reliable third person sources and lacks notability Dwanyewest (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep - Notable enough for being the season finale of an internationally broadcast TV series (see [1]). The huge list of monsters at the bottom was superfluous though and I've deleted it for now. It also badly needs references. Smocking (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as Wikipedia isn't a TV Guide Dwanyewest (talk) 14:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep; Major season finale, the episode is notable.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Finale of a notable TV series. jgpTC 22:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a directory Dwanyewest (talk) 23:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Its fails WP:GNG as wikipedia states "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. Dwanyewest (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep and improve. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep if a reliable source that shows that this is a notable episode can be found. Delete if no reliable source that shows that this is a notable episode can be found. Powergate92Talk 04:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- You do realise the onus is on a editor to prove what they are saying is true WP:PROVEIT. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.[1] All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article.[2] If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Dwanyewest (talk) 05:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)