Content deleted Content added
Rhododendrites (talk | contribs) Listing at WP:DELSORT under Politics (FWDS) |
Rhododendrites (talk | contribs) Listing at WP:DELSORT under United States of America (FWDS) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Obvious keep'''. This is no different from [[Hillary Clinton email controversy]] in the sense of being a perfectly valid article subject. The argument seems to be that it is a POV fork of the [[Clinton Foundation]] article but this controversy would overwhelm that article, just as it would overwhelm the article about the [[United States Department of State]]. There are separate articles about many Clinton scandals, though Wikipedia editors have decided that any list of them is verboten, so it's no surprise when they would try to delete articles about the scandals themselves. Good luck with that. Maybe we should delete [[Watergate scandal]] too, as a POV fork of [[Presidency of Richard Nixon]]?[[User:Anythingyouwant|Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 05:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Obvious keep'''. This is no different from [[Hillary Clinton email controversy]] in the sense of being a perfectly valid article subject. The argument seems to be that it is a POV fork of the [[Clinton Foundation]] article but this controversy would overwhelm that article, just as it would overwhelm the article about the [[United States Department of State]]. There are separate articles about many Clinton scandals, though Wikipedia editors have decided that any list of them is verboten, so it's no surprise when they would try to delete articles about the scandals themselves. Good luck with that. Maybe we should delete [[Watergate scandal]] too, as a POV fork of [[Presidency of Richard Nixon]]?[[User:Anythingyouwant|Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 05:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politics|list of Politics-related deletion discussions]]. — <tt>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></tt> \\ 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politics|list of Politics-related deletion discussions]]. — <tt>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></tt> \\ 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. — <tt>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></tt> \\ 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 05:03, 6 September 2016
Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy
- Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is a WP:POVFORK from the Clinton Foundation, not a notable topic on its own, and is an unsalvageable WP:COATRACK in its current form; also presents BLP concerns. — Wikidemon (talk) 03:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Obvious keep. This is no different from Hillary Clinton email controversy in the sense of being a perfectly valid article subject. The argument seems to be that it is a POV fork of the Clinton Foundation article but this controversy would overwhelm that article, just as it would overwhelm the article about the United States Department of State. There are separate articles about many Clinton scandals, though Wikipedia editors have decided that any list of them is verboten, so it's no surprise when they would try to delete articles about the scandals themselves. Good luck with that. Maybe we should delete Watergate scandal too, as a POV fork of Presidency of Richard Nixon?Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)