Content deleted Content added
The Banner (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Keep''', per Paul Carpenter and Christian75. It could seriously be questioned whether nominators qualification "Advertising" meets [[WP:AGF]], especially when the reason for nominating is so poor. [[User:Eissink|Eissink]] ([[User talk:Eissink|talk]]) 12:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC). |
*'''Keep''', per Paul Carpenter and Christian75. It could seriously be questioned whether nominators qualification "Advertising" meets [[WP:AGF]], especially when the reason for nominating is so poor. [[User:Eissink|Eissink]] ([[User talk:Eissink|talk]]) 12:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC). |
||
::See also [[Talk:Cheminformatics_toolkits#"notable"]] for a note on the unacceptable editing of the nominator. [[User:Eissink|Eissink]] ([[User talk:Eissink|talk]]) 14:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC). |
::See also [[Talk:Cheminformatics_toolkits#"notable"]] for a note on the unacceptable editing of the nominator. [[User:Eissink|Eissink]] ([[User talk:Eissink|talk]]) 14:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC). |
||
:::Ah, here we see the classic action of Eissink. If he does not get what he wants, he start throwing personal attacks. In fact, I was anticipating the keeping of the article and comply to the wishes of Paul Carpenter and others (a wish you supported): ''Keep and improve, non notable list members can be removed.'' But then it should be clear that the listed items must be notable. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">[[User:The Banner|<span style="color:green">The Banner</span>]] [[User talk:The Banner|<i style="color:maroon">talk</i>]]</span> 14:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:43, 15 October 2020
Cheminformatics toolkits
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cheminformatics toolkits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertising, a list of all most all non-notable toolkits (notable as defined as having its own article) The Banner talk 14:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and improve, non notable list members can be removed. --Paul Carpenter (talk) 11:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 18:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 18:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep notable is not defined by having its own article (WP:LISTN. Christian75 (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep for now The notes section indicates some of the entries are notable enough to be listed (in agreement with @Christian75 on that one). However, notability was only established by that means on a few of them. The article needs to fill out the notes section to other publications which discuss these toolkits as a means of establishing the notability of each entry. Ones with no references are not notable and should be deleted, IMO.Footlessmouse (talk) 22:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, per Paul Carpenter and Christian75. It could seriously be questioned whether nominators qualification "Advertising" meets WP:AGF, especially when the reason for nominating is so poor. Eissink (talk) 12:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC).
- See also Talk:Cheminformatics_toolkits#"notable" for a note on the unacceptable editing of the nominator. Eissink (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC).
- Ah, here we see the classic action of Eissink. If he does not get what he wants, he start throwing personal attacks. In fact, I was anticipating the keeping of the article and comply to the wishes of Paul Carpenter and others (a wish you supported): Keep and improve, non notable list members can be removed. But then it should be clear that the listed items must be notable. The Banner talk 14:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- See also Talk:Cheminformatics_toolkits#"notable" for a note on the unacceptable editing of the nominator. Eissink (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC).