Content deleted Content added
Newimpartial (talk | contribs) →Chaos Flare: improper nom |
Newimpartial (talk | contribs) m Sp |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Article on a game lacks any sources of any kind. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com doesn't find any. Fails GNG. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
Article on a game lacks any sources of any kind. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com doesn't find any. Fails GNG. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games|list of Games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 10:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games|list of Games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 10:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> |
||
'''Improper nom by clueless editor''' The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=854745180&oldid=854743507&title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Man,_Myth_%26_Magic_(role-playing_game)]. Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately |
'''Improper nom by clueless editor''' The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=854745180&oldid=854743507&title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Man,_Myth_%26_Magic_(role-playing_game)]. Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. [[User:Newimpartial|Newimpartial]] ([[User talk:Newimpartial|talk]]) 15:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:29, 13 August 2018
Chaos Flare
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chaos Flare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article on a game lacks any sources of any kind. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com doesn't find any. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" [1]. Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. Newimpartial (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)