Content deleted Content added
SpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs) strike dup !votes by nom |
Amanrajveer (talk | contribs) voted |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance.--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CrazyAboutBollywood|CrazyAboutBollywood]] ([[User talk:CrazyAboutBollywood|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CrazyAboutBollywood|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance.--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CrazyAboutBollywood|CrazyAboutBollywood]] ([[User talk:CrazyAboutBollywood|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CrazyAboutBollywood|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:*<sub>striking repetitive !vote by nominator.—[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 22:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)</sub> |
:*<sub>striking repetitive !vote by nominator.—[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 22:23, 29 April 2012 (UTC)</sub> |
||
*'''Delete''' - This article has not sufficient sources. Alexa ranking is self service website any one can create account with it. This is not reliable source and another 2 given sources is not sufficient, its looking like press releases. In both the references, company person are saying the statement and its look like press releases.--Aman Rajveer 05:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:39, 30 April 2012
Bollywood Hungama
- Bollywood Hungama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete - web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject CrazyAboutBollywood 10:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 29. Snotbot t • c » 10:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete- This page is completely under the speedy deletion criteria. following reasons are: G11 Unambiguous advertising or promotion, A7 No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content), Also check the G12 Unambiguous copyright infringement and the give the reference of duplicate content detector whether it is comes under the G12 criteria or not?
--CrazyAboutBollywood 12:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- What line is the article looks like an advertisement to you dear? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Strong keep - totally notable and the article justifies its existence, might need expansion though. Shahid • Talk2me 20:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - enough references available.Fanofbollywood (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fans are so much better than crazy people! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Strong Delete- Please Read criteria G11 and and A7, the article must be deleted.
Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance.--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)--CrazyAboutBollywood 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyAboutBollywood (talk • contribs)
- Delete - This article has not sufficient sources. Alexa ranking is self service website any one can create account with it. This is not reliable source and another 2 given sources is not sufficient, its looking like press releases. In both the references, company person are saying the statement and its look like press releases.--Aman Rajveer 05:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)