Content deleted Content added
Bluesangrel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
ArmstrongJulian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' per above. No extra weight for EuroBasket awards. ~'''''[[User:Editorofthewiki|<font color="#F900">EDDY</font>]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">contribs</font>]])</sup>'''</span>~ 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per above. No extra weight for EuroBasket awards. ~'''''[[User:Editorofthewiki|<font color="#F900">EDDY</font>]]'' <sup>([[User talk:Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">talk</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|<font color="Green">contribs</font>]])</sup>'''</span>~ 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:'''Keep''' The person nominating the award is doing so simply because they are mad at me and I created the article and they want these deleted. Look at my talk page and you can see that. I don't like to have to say that, but it is clear.[[User:Bluesangrel|Bluesangrel]] ([[User talk:Bluesangrel|talk]]) 22:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
:'''Keep''' The person nominating the award is doing so simply because they are mad at me and I created the article and they want these deleted. Look at my talk page and you can see that. I don't like to have to say that, but it is clear.[[User:Bluesangrel|Bluesangrel]] ([[User talk:Bluesangrel|talk]]) 22:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
::My problem with this article, and indeed a number of your edits, is that it doesn't answer wikipedia's notability requirements, do us all a favour and try reading the [[Wikipedia:Notability|official policy]] that determines what should be on the site. You keep making contributions (and I use the term loosely) that are unsourced (again [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|read the guideline]]) and make unsupported claims, this is not a forum or fan page but a website that aims for a certain standard yet you keep editing and acting as if it was the former. --[[User:ArmstrongJulian|ArmstrongJulian]] ([[User talk:ArmstrongJulian|talk]]) 19:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:35, 11 September 2015
All-Europe Player of the Year
- All-Europe Player of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete:Despite the glossy title this is just a selection by a sports website, Eurobasket.com, which itself struggles with notability (though to be fair it is a popular basketball website) similar to the end of season All-whatever selections of thousands of websites. It has no notability beyond the website itself (most awardees don't aknowledge the "distinction") with the lack of coverage to boot.}} ArmstrongJulian (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. --ArmstrongJulian (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)--ArmstrongJulian (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Every media outlet sets awards, no evidence Eurobasket's carry any extra weight/notability. Rikster2 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per above. No extra weight for EuroBasket awards. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The person nominating the award is doing so simply because they are mad at me and I created the article and they want these deleted. Look at my talk page and you can see that. I don't like to have to say that, but it is clear.Bluesangrel (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- My problem with this article, and indeed a number of your edits, is that it doesn't answer wikipedia's notability requirements, do us all a favour and try reading the official policy that determines what should be on the site. You keep making contributions (and I use the term loosely) that are unsourced (again read the guideline) and make unsupported claims, this is not a forum or fan page but a website that aims for a certain standard yet you keep editing and acting as if it was the former. --ArmstrongJulian (talk) 19:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)