Motions
With respect to User:Law and User:The undertow
The Arbitration Committee has been informed that Law (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is an alternate account of The undertow (talk · contribs), and this has been confirmed with the user involved. User:Law has now resigned his administrator tools.[1] At the time that the User:Law account was created, User:The undertow was subject to an Arbitration Committee ban.
Motion:
The Arbitration Committee notes the resignation of administrator tools by Law (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), and further notes that this resignation is under controversial circumstances. The user is restricted to one account, The undertow (talk · contribs). He is required to notify the Arbitration Committee in advance should he wish to change usernames or create a new account, in accordance with Arbitration Committee enforcement procedures initiated in June 2009.[2]
- Support
- Risker (talk) 05:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- John Vandenberg (chat) 05:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- With the caveat that this is not a complete response to the situation. Vassyana (talk) 05:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Roger Davies talk 05:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Abstain
- Recuse
- Comments from Arbitration Committee members
- Comments from others