MehrdadFR
MehrdadFR is blocked for a week, and as a discretionary sanction topic-banned from everything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict for six months. Sandstein 16:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. Request concerning MehrdadFR
1RR vio:
3RR vio (1 hour 15 minutes outside the 24Hr window):
WP:CIVIL / WP:NPA / WP:ASPERSIONS:
10:13, 17 September 2017 alerted - this was prior to his latest 1RR. During the 4RR sequence he was not technically alerted to ARBPIA.
Page was placed in ECP + ARBPIA 16:54, 12 September 2017 after a high-frequency edit war between IPs on this same issue. In addition, prior to the DS alert, the user was also warned he was in violation of 1RR by myself on his talk 19:45, 16 September 2017, and by TheTimesAreAChanging (talk · contribs) in an edit summary 09:17, 17 September 2017. Addendum: 15:51, 18 September 2017 is a further 1RR vio in relation to the 18:53, 17 September 2017 revert (2nd revert above).Icewhiz (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC) 16:00, 18 September 2017 Is yet another.Icewhiz (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Discussion concerning MehrdadFRStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by MehrdadFRSituation here is pretty obvious, AMIA attack is legally unsolved case and that's an undeniable fact, and few activists are desperately trying to change it and promote one-sided politically motivated accusations, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Everything can be found on Talk:AMIA bombing in detail: investigate journalists are deleted from article (WP:CENSORED), as well as five other scholarly sources, books by lobbyist organization such as WINEP are promoted, and so on. Involved user obviously invited his fellow Israeli to vandalize article, and then they play on alleged "consensus" and "1RR" card. --MehrdadFR (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Statement by CambalacheroThe article was protected on September 12 by Samsara because of the Arbitration case (here). As I first became aware of such arbitration then, I added {{ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement}} to the article talk page, just in case, on September 17 (here). The discussion escalated anyway, so on September 18 I pinged both users to remind them of those discretionary sanctions here. Then I was informed that this AE had been already filled. Checking the background a bit more, I noticed that MehrdadFR had already been warned and then deleted the warnings. Then, he broke the 1RR: here MehrdadFR deletes and replaces a lot of info, Icewhiz reverted him here, and MehrdadFR restored his edit here (all the same day, September 18). Cambalachero (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC) By the way, I'm not much interested either way in the Arab-Israeli dispute. I watch this article because I usually work with articles about the politics in Argentina, and the AMIA bombing is a frequent topic of news, even to this day (I also created the related articles Alberto Nisman and Memorandum of understanding between Argentina and Iran). Cambalachero (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Statement by (username)Result concerning MehrdadFR
|