EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Lugia2453: Put user's name into the headers so the TOC doesn't appear broken. Apologies for fixing up a closed report |
→Result concerning Buttons: It does count |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
As discussed by NE Ent, we may not act on this request because the warning was not provided in the form required by the Arbitration Committee, and no evidence of how Button might otherwise have been aware of discretionary sanctions is provided. The complainant should alert Buttons with the required template, {{tl|Ds/alert}}, and may resubmit this request if problems persist. I offer no opinion on the merits of the request, which I have not read in detail because of the abovementioned formal problem. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |
As discussed by NE Ent, we may not act on this request because the warning was not provided in the form required by the Arbitration Committee, and no evidence of how Button might otherwise have been aware of discretionary sanctions is provided. The complainant should alert Buttons with the required template, {{tl|Ds/alert}}, and may resubmit this request if problems persist. I offer no opinion on the merits of the request, which I have not read in detail because of the abovementioned formal problem. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 16:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
*Buttons was notified in November 2009 by [[User:Toddst1]] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Buttons&diff=prev&oldid=327669482 here] using an old-style notice. Since that notice is more than one year in the past, it seems not to count any more. Buttons should be notified now using {{tl|Ds/alert}}. I recommend that [[User:TrinaryEarth]] be indefinitely blocked as a sock under normal admin authority. His account was created on 28 April and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Kosovo_declaration_of_independence&diff=prev&oldid=606882694 on 3 May he is already chatting away accusing Bobrayner of various things] and restoring a contentious bit of text to the lead of [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence]]. To keep down the general level of socking I recommend putting semiprotection on this article as well as [[United Regions of Serbia]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |
*Buttons was notified in November 2009 by [[User:Toddst1]] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Buttons&diff=prev&oldid=327669482 here] using an old-style notice. Since that notice is more than one year in the past, it seems not to count any more. Buttons should be notified now using {{tl|Ds/alert}}. I recommend that [[User:TrinaryEarth]] be indefinitely blocked as a sock under normal admin authority. His account was created on 28 April and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008_Kosovo_declaration_of_independence&diff=prev&oldid=606882694 on 3 May he is already chatting away accusing Bobrayner of various things] and restoring a contentious bit of text to the lead of [[2008 Kosovo declaration of independence]]. To keep down the general level of socking I recommend putting semiprotection on this article as well as [[United Regions of Serbia]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
::{{Reply to|Sandstein|NE Ent|EdJohnston}} That warning issued by Toddst1 does count under the [[WP:AC/DS#Continuity|continuity]] section of the new discretionary sanctions procedures. As it is a warning issued under the old system so it becomes an alert for twelve months after the new DS procedure passed. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 11:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Lugia2453== |
==Lugia2453== |
Revision as of 11:50, 27 May 2014
Request for modification: Kosovo article-level limitations
By request from Newyorkbrad, I'm cross-posting this as a notification of an ongoing proposal at WP:AN#Request to relax article restriction on Kosovo. Please discuss there. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Buttons
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below.
Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Request concerning Buttons
- User who is submitting this request for enforcement
- Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 10:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- User against whom enforcement is requested
- Buttons (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Search CT alerts: in user talk history • in system log
- Sanction or remedy to be enforced
- WP:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions
- Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
- on United Regions of Serbia: long-term slow rv-warring against multiple editors
- on 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence
- on Geography of Kosovo:
- 26 May, expressing sense of "ownership" by claiming other editors need "authorization" to edit
- [1] immediate re-revert without discussion
- Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any
- was blocked in 2011 for edit-warring and misuse of "vandalism" accusations on similar Serbia-related topics
- If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts)
- Warned today, prior to latest rv [2]
- Additional comments by editor filing complaint
Editor evidently has a long-term pattern of routinely using edit-warring as their primary response to content disagreement. Before 2011, he even had a note describing his role on Wikipedia as "protects and monitors any and all pages concerning Serbia and Serbs from vandalism".
- Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested
- [3]
Discussion concerning Buttons
Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.
Statement by Buttons
Statement by NE Ent
Close without action. 1) United_Regions_of_Serbia: Editors are expected to discuss disputed changes. Buttons initiated discussion at Talk:United_Regions_of_Serbia on 15 April. Give no one replied, they should allowed to make their edit. 2) Geography of Kosovo: (You don't have the authority to make that decision on your own) is a substantially different statement than I own the article. Per consensus, none of us have the ability to make a content decision "on our own." The reverts cited were different content. 3) 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence: Special:Contributions/TrinaryEarth is not a revert only account, and Buttons is participating in discussion at Talk:2008_Kosovo_declaration_of_independence#A_problem.
Regretfully, a lame technicality: the DS notification provided is invalid per the current arbcom requirements at Wikipedia:AC/DS#Awareness_and_alert, which requires the notification template be posted unmodified. (I agree that's its a lame rule totally out of sync with our iar pillar, but ya'll will have to take that up with the committee). NE Ent 12:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Statement by (username)
Result concerning Buttons
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
As discussed by NE Ent, we may not act on this request because the warning was not provided in the form required by the Arbitration Committee, and no evidence of how Button might otherwise have been aware of discretionary sanctions is provided. The complainant should alert Buttons with the required template, {{Ds/alert}}, and may resubmit this request if problems persist. I offer no opinion on the merits of the request, which I have not read in detail because of the abovementioned formal problem. Sandstein 16:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Buttons was notified in November 2009 by User:Toddst1 here using an old-style notice. Since that notice is more than one year in the past, it seems not to count any more. Buttons should be notified now using {{Ds/alert}}. I recommend that User:TrinaryEarth be indefinitely blocked as a sock under normal admin authority. His account was created on 28 April and on 3 May he is already chatting away accusing Bobrayner of various things and restoring a contentious bit of text to the lead of 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. To keep down the general level of socking I recommend putting semiprotection on this article as well as United Regions of Serbia. EdJohnston (talk) 16:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Sandstein, NE Ent, and EdJohnston: That warning issued by Toddst1 does count under the continuity section of the new discretionary sanctions procedures. As it is a warning issued under the old system so it becomes an alert for twelve months after the new DS procedure passed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:50, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Lugia2453
Not actionable, at least not in this form. Complainant 67.164.188.243 blocked by Acroterion in part because of this report. Sandstein 16:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. Request concerning Lugia2453
In the Sandy Hook Conspirarcy theory article her and another user keep removing a request to review the article for deletion even though I have made my request conform to the guidelines on the deletion standards page. I believe the request is valid and she is preventing the request from generating a discussion as would be proper by removing the tagging. She is not an administrator and should not remove tags without permission of an admin or moderator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting_conspiracy_theories
(cur | prev) 15:55, 26 May 2014 McSly (talk | contribs) . . (23,531 bytes) (-272) . . (Undid revision 610220748 by 67.164.188.243 (talk) the protocol is to take the article to AFD) (undo) (cur | prev) 15:49, 26 May 2014 67.164.188.243 (talk) . . (23,803 bytes) (+272) . . (Undid revision 610220588 by Lugia2453 (talk) you can't revoke this tagging simply becuase you don't like it, once the article has been tagged you must follow the protocol of discussion.) (undo) (cur | prev) 15:48, 26 May 2014 Lugia2453 (talk | contribs) . . (23,531 bytes) (-272) . . (Undid revision 610219607 by 67.164.188.243 (talk) No, you've been told why your tagging is inappropriate on your talk page) (undo) (cur | prev) 15:40, 26 May 2014 67.164.188.243 (talk) . . (23,803 bytes) (+272) . . (undo) (cur | prev) 15:33, 26 May 2014 Acroterion (talk | contribs) . . (23,531 bytes) (-149) . . (Reverted 1 edit by 67.164.188.243 (talk): Rv inappropriate tagging. (TW)) (undo) (cur | prev) 15:33, 26 May 2014 67.164.188.243 (talk) . . (23,680 bytes) (+149) . . (Undid revision 610218533 by Lugia2453 (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 15:31, 26 May 2014 Lugia2453 (talk | contribs) . . (23,531 bytes) (-149) . . (Reverted good faith edits by 67.164.188.243 (talk): Not a reason for speedy deletion. Even if does go through AFD, it'll likely end up being kept anyway. (TW)) (undo)
I am tagging this article again for AFD.
Discussion concerning Lugia2453Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by Lugia2453Result concerning Lugia2453This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|