EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Result concerning Interfase: Support 1RR |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Interfase: Collapse box. Tweak restriction |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Interfase == |
== Interfase == |
||
{{hat|1=[[User:Interfase]] is placed under an indefinite [[WP:1RR]] restriction regarding all edits related to the [[WP:ARBAA2]] topic. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC) }} |
|||
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br>Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small> |
|||
===Request concerning Interfase=== |
===Request concerning Interfase=== |
||
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : [[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sup>talk</sup>]] 21:28, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : [[User:Yerevanci|<font color="red">'''Ե'''</font><font color="blue">րևանցի</font>]] [[User talk:Yerevanci|<sup>talk</sup>]] 21:28, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
Line 83: | Line 82: | ||
::Of the two proposals from EdJohnston, I question whether a three month topic ban would actually necessarily achieve much, particularly in light of the 2010 warning he links to, which would make the 1RR proposed by Sandstein and apparently(?) considered reasonable by EdJohnston probably preferable. So, just for clarity, in this instance I would support Sandstein's indefinite 1RR proposal, although I would prefer "indefinite" over "permanent". [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC) |
::Of the two proposals from EdJohnston, I question whether a three month topic ban would actually necessarily achieve much, particularly in light of the 2010 warning he links to, which would make the 1RR proposed by Sandstein and apparently(?) considered reasonable by EdJohnston probably preferable. So, just for clarity, in this instance I would support Sandstein's indefinite 1RR proposal, although I would prefer "indefinite" over "permanent". [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::Given John's view, I'll switch to supporting the indefinite [[WP:1RR]] restriction on [[User:Interfase]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 00:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC) |
:::Given John's view, I'll switch to supporting the indefinite [[WP:1RR]] restriction on [[User:Interfase]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 00:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::It seems unlikely we will get more comments, so this request is closed with an indefinite [[WP:1RR]] restriction of [[User:Interfase]] regarding all edits related to the [[WP:ARBAA2]] topic. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 02:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{hab}} |
Revision as of 02:43, 16 October 2013
Interfase
User:Interfase is placed under an indefinite WP:1RR restriction regarding all edits related to the WP:ARBAA2 topic. EdJohnston (talk) 02:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Request concerning Interfase
In the Gyumri article, Interfase added an old image of local Azerbaijanis. An IP 188.255.44.254 (talk · contribs) removed it, while Interfase (as you can see above) reverted the IP for 14 times! As a result, the article is protected for 10 days. Also, I'd like to point out Interfase's past troublesome behavior
Discussion concerning InterfaseStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by InterfaseNot only I reverted IP 188.255.44.254, but also user EuroCarGT [5][6]. I still think that edits of this IP is just vandalism and an anti-Azerbaijani action. Reverts of the vandals is not edir warring. But, however, after warning by administrator, I'll not return my edit, because I already initiated a discussion on this issue on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. --Interfase (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Statement by HablabarThe "Tatars from Alexandropol" is likely to be a Photoshop forgery. There were no "Tatars" in Alexandropol, ever. There were a small number of Turks, who lived in the so called "Turkish mailla." The photo is of unknown origin. It cannot be placed anywhere in WP without further investigation. Hablabar (talk) 20:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Result concerning InterfaseThis section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above. Interfase is wrong to characterise this content dispute as vandalism, see WP:NOTVANDALISM. They have engaged in forbidden edit-warring. Because of their recurring problems with edit-warring, I suggest a permanent WP:1RR restriction for them in the WP:ARBAA topic area, and an arbitration enforcement warning for the IP. Sandstein 07:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
|