Content deleted Content added
Keystone Crow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Courcelles (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} |
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} |
||
== Mathsci and Echigo Mole == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Keystone Crow|Keystone Crow]] ([[User talk:Keystone Crow|talk]]) '''at''' 04:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|Keystone Crow}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|Mathsci}} |
|||
*{{userlinks|Echigo Mole}} |
|||
*{{admin|Jclemens}} |
|||
*{{admin|MastCell}} |
|||
*{{userlinks|TrevelyanL85A2}} |
|||
*{{admin|Nyttend}} |
|||
*{{userlinks|Collect}} |
|||
*{{admin|Trödel}} |
|||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*Diff. 1 |
|||
*Diff. 2 |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
|||
*[[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum/Archives/2012/February#Reginald_of_Durham]] |
|||
*[[User_talk:Trödel/Archive_13#Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations.2FEchigo_mole]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mathsci/Archive#26_May_2012]] |
|||
*[[User_talk:Jclemens#Your_conduct]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Response_to_wikihounding]] |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_TrevelyanL85A2]] |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 1} === |
|||
Unfortunately this issue seems to now need attention from ArbCom. There's been some discussion at AE about requesting arbitration, so it's time someone went ahead. The question is not how Mathsci should treat sockpuppets, but rather his behaviour toward editors who want him to stop reverting anyone who restores edits made by suspected socks. The threads above show this has been a conflict since February, and last month it led to a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mathsci/Archive#26_May_2012|new conflict]] between Mathsci and Jclemens about Mathsci's response when his own partially-declared alternate account Aixoise was reported at SPI. An RFC likely cannot resolve this, because in the threads above Mathsci has accused three admins (Trödel, Nyttend and Jclemens) of acting in bad faith, and at AE TrevelyanL85A2 accuses MastCell of breaching WP:INVOLVED by overruling Jclemens following a private request from Mathsci. Mathsci is also calling for Nyttend to be desysopped. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nyttend&diff=prev&oldid=495812817] He's threatened Nyttend with arbitration, so he cannot now object to a case being opened. |
|||
As in the Aixoisie SPI, ArbCom would do best to consider this request on its merits, and whether the community can expect to solve so divisive a dispute among three admins. |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 2} === |
|||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === |
|||
=== Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) === |
|||
* |