m →Arbitrator's opinions (1/5/0/0): tally |
→[[User:Adam Carr]]: '''Rejected''' |
||
Line 73:
* Reject [[User:The Epopt|➥the Epopt]] 21:41, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
==Requests for Clarification==
|
Revision as of 21:49, 11 March 2005
|
The last step of dispute resolution is a request for arbitration. Please review other avenues you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the Arbitration Committee.
- Arbitration policy
- Administrator enforcement requested (shortcut WP:RFAr/AER)
- Developer help needed
- Standing orders
- Arbitration template
- Contact the Arbitration Committee
Please place comments on the talk page, not here.
Structure of this page
The procedure for accepting requests is described in the Arbitration policy. Important points:
- Be brief. Put a quick list of the nature of the complaints. Place the request itself on this page, rather than a subpage, but if you need to, link to detailed evidence in the standard template format elsewhere.
- You are required to place a notice on the user talk page of each person you lodge a complaint against. You should confirm this by providing diffs of the notification at the bottom of your complaint.
- Please sign and date at least your original submission with "~~~~."
- New requests to the top, please.
New requests
When adding new requests, please give them an appropriate title as well as a subsection for arbitrator's votes.
User:Jayjg
User Jayjg, armed with admin powers, has a blatant anti-Arab and anti-Islamic bent and is an intractable edit warrior whose idea on enforcing his point of view is to delete and/or revert the changes made to articles that do not agree with his or her agenda. Most of the time he or she is factually wrong, but that seems to be of no concern. I have direct experience in related articles but reviewing all his or her edits it seems to me that the only reason he or she wanted to become admin is to exercise undue powers in enforcing certain ideas. When he or she failed in "discussion" he or she tracked me to my user page and, I guess spitefully, put a request for deleteion on a page I was forced to create so I could heep a copy of what he or she kept deleteing. I request that some solution be provided for this user jayjg's bias.A.Khalil 04:52, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- I'll step in now and off the bat, and make it clear that, should this get accepted (Which seems unlikely without some evidence being offered), I am willing to act as an advocate for JayJG. Snowspinner 04:55, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- I'd like to offer this [1] as an example of the state that A.Khalil left Timeline of Human Atrocities in on February 14, a page he created, it appears, for the sole purpose of making an anti-Israel point. According to A.Khalil's edits, there have been only two human atrocities throughout history: the first in BCE 149 when the Romans slaughtered the people of Carthage, and the second in 1994 when Dr. Baruch Goldstein killed 29 Palestinians. SlimVirgin 05:17, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- First, the Romans were not Israelis, unless your history is that far off. Second, both were two of the edits that you kept removing from the article and I remembered them and kept them there. Notice that I have never advertised or linked this article to anything else on wikipedia. You just found it because you intentionally went snooping for something to make the damn Arab pay back for correcting your mistakes. I cannot go to back edits like you, but anyone can see the history of your edits and mine and compare. Also, anyone can see the the complaints on your talk page. This is a pattern of yours.A.Khalil 14:32, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- A. Khalil, you may be confusing me with someone else. I don't recall having had direct dealings with you and haven't found anything in my or your contributions that suggests otherwise. SlimVirgin 12:20, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- First, the Romans were not Israelis, unless your history is that far off. Second, both were two of the edits that you kept removing from the article and I remembered them and kept them there. Notice that I have never advertised or linked this article to anything else on wikipedia. You just found it because you intentionally went snooping for something to make the damn Arab pay back for correcting your mistakes. I cannot go to back edits like you, but anyone can see the history of your edits and mine and compare. Also, anyone can see the the complaints on your talk page. This is a pattern of yours.A.Khalil 14:32, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- I'd like to offer this [1] as an example of the state that A.Khalil left Timeline of Human Atrocities in on February 14, a page he created, it appears, for the sole purpose of making an anti-Israel point. According to A.Khalil's edits, there have been only two human atrocities throughout history: the first in BCE 149 when the Romans slaughtered the people of Carthage, and the second in 1994 when Dr. Baruch Goldstein killed 29 Palestinians. SlimVirgin 05:17, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
I'd be interested to know which specific admin powers A. Khalil thinks I am "abusing", and why he hasn't first brought this to RfC, which has a specific section for alleged abuses of admin powers. Jayjg (talk) 14:58, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Evidence presented by A.Khalil
Khalil misunderstood Neutrality's (rather misleading) comment below and started to edit the Evidence template itself. I am moving it here. Text below is due to Khalil. --Zero 13:22, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I am compiling evidence and learning how to use the system at the same time, thus bear with me a little.
- As of Jan 20th, 2005, user Jayjg had the followeing text on his/her page, showing a pattern of paranoia perceiving that pages related to Israel are under attack, and an agenda in, him or herself, weeding Wikipedia of data that is unfavorable to Israel. The same type pages (s)he targets for deletion are, by a twist of moral standard, created and POV enforced by Jayjg and allies for Israel.[[2]]
See also [[3]] [[4]] [[5]] [[6]] [[7]] And there are many many more list of this kind. All showing an agenda of defending Israel at any cost.
- I am not the only one receiving the Jayjg treatment, but rather many others have the same complaint. See [[8]] for one eloquent sample. See Jayjg's talk page for many other complaints.
- I suspect that user Jayjg and user SlimVirgin are the same person, or related. User SlimVirgin even updates and reverts edits for user Jayjg's talk page. Also, within few hours after I posted the notice of Arbitration on user Jayjg's talk page, user SlimVirgin pops up to defend user Jayjg.
Example [[9]]
- That is an outrageous claim. Substantiate allegations prior to directing them towards others (even as suspicions). El_C 14:29, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Next I will search for specific edits and present them here. I will need sometime though, since I have a life to live and a Wikisystem to learn. I'm sure I will have some this evening. (posted by A.Khalil)
- For the record, I have never updated Jay's user or talk page. The link provided by User:A.Khalil [10] was an example of anonymous vandalism to Jay's user page, which I reverted. SlimVirgin 13:51, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/6/0/1)
- Reject pending evidence as put forth in /Template/Evidence. Neutralitytalk 04:57, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Reject - David Gerard 09:28, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Reject. Ambi 11:18, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Please add some examples of specific edits which illustrate the problems you are complaining off Fred Bauder 14:38, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
Agree with Fred; please demonstrate evidence of a dispute. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 16:18, 2005 Mar 10 (UTC)Reject, for the moment, as evidence currently provided does not demonstrate a dispute. Do not remove this case before more evidence is provided. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 18:35, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC)- Reject for now. If you come up with any evidence I may change my mindTheresa Knott (ask the rotten) 22:13, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Reject ➥the Epopt 21:41, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Requests for Clarification
If you need to clarify the precise meaning of a previous decision of the Arbitration Committee, your request should go here.
Matters currently in Arbitration
- /Dr Zen - Accepted with five votes and three recusals on 10 March 2005. Evidence to /Dr Zen/Evidence, please.
- /WHEELER - Accepted with six votes on 9 March 2005. Evidence to /WHEELER/Evidence, please.
- /Noah Peters - Accepted with five votes on 8 March 2005. Evidence to /Noah Peters/Evidence, please.
- /172 2 - Accepted with four votes, one rejection and four recusals on 6 March 2005. Evidence to /172 2/Evidence, please.
- /Baku Ibne et. al. - Accepted with four votes on 4 March 2005. Evidence to /Baku Ibne et. al./Evidence, please.
- /JarlaxleArtemis - Accepted with four votes on 3 March 2005. Evidence to /JarlaxleArtemis/Evidence, please.
- /Robert Blair - Accepted with four votes on 27 February 2005. Evidence to /Robert Blair/Evidence, please.
- /Anthony DiPierro 2 -
- Request by Snowspinner: Accepted with four votes and 5 recusals on 26 February 2005.
- Request by Raul654: Accepted and merged with five votes on 2 March 2005. Evidence to /Anthony DiPierro 2/Evidence, please.
- /PSYCH - Accepted with four votes and one rejection on 19 February 2005. Evidence to /PSYCH/Evidence, please.
- /RK 2 - Accepted with five votes and one recusal on 16 February 2005. Evidence to /RK 2/Evidence, please.
Please also see Template:ArbComCases.