EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
== [[User:Illuminaati]] reported by [[User:Teishin]] (Result: ) == |
== [[User:Illuminaati]] reported by [[User:Teishin]] (Result: Page protected) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Shakya}} <br /> |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Shakya}} <br /> |
||
Line 259: | Line 259: | ||
[[User:Teishin|Teishin]] ([[User talk:Teishin|talk]]) 16:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:Teishin|Teishin]] ([[User talk:Teishin|talk]]) 16:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{AN3|p}} – 3 days, due to a two-person edit war between [[User:Teishin]] and [[User:Illuminaati]]. Beware of continuing the war after protection expires. Use the steps of [[WP:Dispute resolution]]. The edit summaries of [[User:Illuminaati]] are getting close to personal attacks. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_150#Talk:Shakya#Ethnicity a DRN from 2017] for prior discussion about [[Shakya]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:02, 11 April 2020
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
User:Nico KTM reported by User:ArchonBoi (Result: )
- Page
- Cyprus Classic Motorcycle Museum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Nico KTM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 16:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC) "Added some helpful info about the museum motorcycles in depth info for helping people reach more info about it !"
- 15:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC) ""
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 16:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC) "/* Removal of maintenance tags */ new section"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
User keeps removing maintenance tags without fixing the underlying issues. I've tried advising them when removal of these is appropriate. ArchonBoi—(Talk) 16:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
User:Gizapink reported by User:CaradhrasAiguo (Result: Blocked)
- Page
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Gizapink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 06:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "Undid revision 950089638 by CaradhrasAiguo (talk) Revert addition"
- 04:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "Undid revision 950067435 by CaradhrasAiguo (talk) Revert addition"
- 17:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC) "This is not needed as Hong Kong and Macau are already in chart"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
This issue has already been discussed with implicit reference to this template, per the wording here; whole discussion may be seen at Talk:2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic/Archive_28#China_(mainland)
- Comments:
I was against reporting until I saw this despicable jab at "mental health" and prior thread here. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 06:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- User:CaradhrasAiguo has a long history of aggressive editing and pro-Chinese propoganda. In this particular edit he is referencing the talk page in which he is the only editor in favour of adding (mainland). He clearly has a very obvious agenda. Gizapink (talk) 06:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Textbook baseless accusation of WP:COI, a repeat of this trope-filled post (
working for the Chinese state
). The previous slap on the wrist had better be a slamming of the doors / portals. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 06:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)- User:CaradhrasAiguo has been warned, warned, and warned. Then blocked, blocked, and blocked. User:CaradhrasAiguo is a repeat offender and has a LONG history of aggressive editing and warring. It's time to slam the door on this problem editor for good. This is editor has an OBVIOUS agenda. Gizapink (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- I count the above crap as the third ([3] [4] [5]) outburst in violation of WP:NPA in the last hour alone. Hardly a good start to one's editing career. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 07:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note to the closing admin that Gizapink has been blocked following the ANI discussion. — MarkH21talk 08:38, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- I count the above crap as the third ([3] [4] [5]) outburst in violation of WP:NPA in the last hour alone. Hardly a good start to one's editing career. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 07:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- User:CaradhrasAiguo has been warned, warned, and warned. Then blocked, blocked, and blocked. User:CaradhrasAiguo is a repeat offender and has a LONG history of aggressive editing and warring. It's time to slam the door on this problem editor for good. This is editor has an OBVIOUS agenda. Gizapink (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked – Gizapink is already blocked one week by User:Ymblanter for personal attacks per the ANI complaint. EdJohnston (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Textbook baseless accusation of WP:COI, a repeat of this trope-filled post (
User:Anatomycbmcb reported by User:Kautilya3 (Result: Blocks)
- Page
- Tablighi Jamaat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Anatomycbmcb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Anatomy iggmc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 19:17 9 April 2020
- 13:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "/* History */False citation: do not support the presented content Template:No reliable resources"
- 00:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "/* History */Not having a proper live citation"
- 15:12, 10 April 2020
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 14:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Tablighi Jamaat. (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
The user has admitted that they are operating two accounts. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Result: User:Anatomycbmcb is blocked 72 hours for edit warring and abusing multiple accounts. User:Anatomy iggmc has been indef blocked as a sock. EdJohnston (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
User:81.96.197.232 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: Semi)
- Page
- British Asian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- 81.96.197.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 16:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 16:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC) to 16:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Consecutive edits made from 23:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC) to 23:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- 23:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC) ""
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Warned about unexplained content removal here, hasn't joined the discussion here at the talk page, and otherwise unresponsive. 3RR violation. — MarkH21talk 16:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Result: Page semiprotected two months. Unexplained removal of sourced content by IPs, for instance here. EdJohnston (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
User:Hugeshantz reported by User:WmLawson (Result: )
Page: Synapse Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hugeshantz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [10]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: This editor has repeatedly added content that is a mixture of the editor's opinion, nonneutral, cherry-picked, and represents original research, using noncurrent and nonneutral opinion piece columns and unreliable sources directly against WP:NOR, WP:CHERRYPICKING, and WP:NPOV. I've requested the edits be discussed at [11] a few times, but the user continues to post the very same content without discussion or justification.
WmLawson (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
User:Vallabharebejnd reported by User:Blue Square Thing (Result: )
- Page
- Pune Warriors India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Vallabharebejnd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 11:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "Undid revision 950301469 by Blue Square Thing (talk)"
- 09:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "Undid revision 950297429 by Blue Square Thing (talk)"
- 09:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "Undid revision 950288969 by Spike 'em (talk)"
- 01:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC) ""
- 16:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC) ""
- 16:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC) "/* Squad */"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 09:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing. (TW)"
- 10:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing. (TW)"
- 10:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Pune Warriors India. (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
The warnings above all attempt to engage the user.
- Comments:
Multiple reverts - also on other related pages. Possible link to blocked User:Iloveuou as well. Refusing to engage as well and has created a bunch of random articles as well - the talk page is littered with warnings etc... Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- User seems to be a sock of Vallabhas and clearly WP:NOTHERE. Spike 'em (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I've noted a number of other diffs on a range of articles on the user's talk page. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
User:Broichmore reported by User:Llammakey (Result: OP warned)
- Page
- USS Wolverine (IX-64) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Broichmore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Nowhere else in the article is the definite article used. Attempts to rectify this had led to this user edit-warring because they believe they are right Llammakey (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment: you left all the fields blank. Please add the pertinent diffs. El_C 12:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Actually not the case Llammakey has a habit of trolling me. Only today he has followed USS Wolverine (IX-64) , François d'Orléans, Prince of Joinville, HMS Buzzard, and the Portuguese East India Company the last with no result poor thing, oh and Jan Huyghen van Linschoten. He's spent all day visiting everything I do. I only noticed late today, but when I go back there he is on the 8th of April at USS Martha Washington (ID-3019), Cosulich Line, Bombardment of Casablanca (1907) etc etc... persecuting me. Broichmore (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
User:Michael0986 reported by User:Andrzejbanas (Result: )
Page: The Sweet Body of Deborah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Michael0986 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [12]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- diff
- diff
- diff "Not vandalism at all, just common sense. Why the big deal over a release date?"
- diff "You're the one being disruptive and throwing your weight around."
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Myself discussing on the users talk page. and again on the films talk page here.
Comments:
I'm giving the user a benefit of the doubt of being new but they have been adding information with sources that WP:FILM does not allow and I've attempted to explain to the user some basic Wiki rules WP:RS and WP:OR and WP:SUBJECTIVE. The user seems to be aware of the talk page messages, as they deleted my previous statement about genre warring. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
User:EditQwerty reported by User:DrKay (Result: )
Page: Elizabeth II (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: EditQwerty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [13]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [18]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on talk page: [19]
Comments:
User:Illuminaati reported by User:Teishin (Result: Page protected)
Page: Shakya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Illuminaati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [20]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [27]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [28]
Comments:
Note:
1. The disputed content also appears at Gautama_Buddha#Historical_context. This has been discussed on the Talk page and that discussion of the issue should appear at Gautama_Buddha#Historical_context. Illuminaati was asked to take the dispute there. Illuminaati removed the content from Gautama_Buddha#Historical_context [[29]] and the removal was reverted [30]] there on 20 March. There was no discussion of the matter at Talk:Gautama_Buddha and no further edit warring.
2. There are similarities with the current issue and one from 2017 Talk:Shakya#Ethnicity also involving Illuminaati. This required mediation and resulted in Illuminaati being blocked for 1 week, warned about operating sockpuppets, and warned about accusing editors of bad faith edits. See User_talk:Illuminaati.
Teishin (talk) 16:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Page protected – 3 days, due to a two-person edit war between User:Teishin and User:Illuminaati. Beware of continuing the war after protection expires. Use the steps of WP:Dispute resolution. The edit summaries of User:Illuminaati are getting close to personal attacks. See a DRN from 2017 for prior discussion about Shakya. EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)