EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Zara1709 self report (Result: 12 hours): Result (Note that this editor reported himself) |
62.103.147.54 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 505: | Line 505: | ||
Attention, [[Cynicism]]: I've done everything I could, but it just isn't enough. A historian has written a controversial, but good book about [[Religion in Nazi Germany]], where it is among many other things pointed out that Hitler can be classified as "nominally Catholic". This is explain in a great detail on [[Talk:Adolf Hitler]]. Of course, to paraphrase that historian himself, ''that Hitler as the world-historical metaphor for human evil and wickedness should in some way have been a member of a Christian Church can be regarded by many only as unthinkable'', but it is fact. I patiently and, I hope, skilfully, explained this to the editors who removed it repeatedly from the article, but I have not achieved anything. ''Accurate scholarship can unearth the whole offense from Luther until no that has driven a culture mad; find what occurred at Linz, what huge image made a psychopathic god,'' but Wikipedia will not be able to present the result of this scholarship. Steigmann-Gall certainly is a reliable source on Nazism and Religion, and I can not leave the last edit summary comment standing as it is. I know that it is likely that I might get banned for formally breaking the 3-revert-rule, but I have to revert. ([[User:Zara1709|Zara1709]] ([[User talk:Zara1709|talk]]) 21:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)) |
Attention, [[Cynicism]]: I've done everything I could, but it just isn't enough. A historian has written a controversial, but good book about [[Religion in Nazi Germany]], where it is among many other things pointed out that Hitler can be classified as "nominally Catholic". This is explain in a great detail on [[Talk:Adolf Hitler]]. Of course, to paraphrase that historian himself, ''that Hitler as the world-historical metaphor for human evil and wickedness should in some way have been a member of a Christian Church can be regarded by many only as unthinkable'', but it is fact. I patiently and, I hope, skilfully, explained this to the editors who removed it repeatedly from the article, but I have not achieved anything. ''Accurate scholarship can unearth the whole offense from Luther until no that has driven a culture mad; find what occurred at Linz, what huge image made a psychopathic god,'' but Wikipedia will not be able to present the result of this scholarship. Steigmann-Gall certainly is a reliable source on Nazism and Religion, and I can not leave the last edit summary comment standing as it is. I know that it is likely that I might get banned for formally breaking the 3-revert-rule, but I have to revert. ([[User:Zara1709|Zara1709]] ([[User talk:Zara1709|talk]]) 21:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)) |
||
:{{An3|b|12 hours}} Since this editor reported himself here at the noticeboard, no 3RR warning is needed. I think any admin should unblock him if he agrees to wait for a Talk page consensus before restoring the claim about Hitler's Catholicism to the article. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 21:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
:{{An3|b|12 hours}} Since this editor reported himself here at the noticeboard, no 3RR warning is needed. I think any admin should unblock him if he agrees to wait for a Talk page consensus before restoring the claim about Hitler's Catholicism to the article. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 21:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
==[[User:RMHED]] reported by [[Special:Contributions/62.103.147.54|62.103.147.54]] ([[User talk:62.103.147.54|talk]]) (Result: )== |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] violation on |
|||
{{Article|Manning_Marable}}. {{3RRV|RMHED}}: Time reported: 23:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
''Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC'' |
|||
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manning_Marable&diff=prev&oldid=260605981 03:15, 29 December 2008] <small>(edit summary: "Asserts imp/sig")</small> |
|||
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manning_Marable&diff=prev&oldid=260755351 22:17, 29 December 2008] <small>(edit summary: "[[WP:UNDO|Undid]] revision 260754299 by [[Special:Contributions/62.103.147.54|62.103.147.54]] ([[User talk:62.103.147.54|talk]])There are several assertions of imp/sig")</small> |
|||
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manning_Marable&diff=prev&oldid=260757651 22:29, 29 December 2008] <small>(edit summary: "Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/62.103.147.54|62.103.147.54]] ([[User talk:62.103.147.54|talk]]) to last version by RMHED")</small> |
|||
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manning_Marable&diff=prev&oldid=260763166 22:58, 29 December 2008] <small>(edit summary: "[[WP:UNDO|Undid]] revision 260760880 by [[Special:Contributions/62.103.147.54|62.103.147.54]] ([[User talk:62.103.147.54|talk]])I have given my reasons for removing the CSD several times.")</small> |
|||
Seems to keep doing this in similar cases, such as [[Prof._Dr._Rahimi_Tabar.]] and others that can be found in his contributions page. From his talk page a couple of other users seem to have been unhappy with similar reverts as well. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
Anthony |
|||
—[[Special:Contributions/62.103.147.54|62.103.147.54]] ([[User talk:62.103.147.54|talk]]) 23:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:24, 29 December 2008
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Reports
- Please place new reports at the BOTTOM. If you do not see your report, you can search the archives for it.
EmpMac reported by Josh the Nerd (Result: 24 hours)
- Page: Windows 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: EmpMac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [1]
- Diff of 3RR warning: [7]
Note that EmpMac sometimes labels the edits he/she is reverting as vandalism, even though they are clearly not vandalism. - Josh (talk | contribs) 16:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Basically one user reverting everyone else and calling it vandalism for soapboxing about Windows7 copying ideas from Mac OS X. There's a thread on the talk page as well. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Administrator note Blocked user for 24 hours. — Aitias // discussion 17:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
70.234.147.98 reported by Binksternet (Result: S-protected)
- Page: Horn speaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: 70.128.102.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- User: 71.153.163.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- User: 70.234.126.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- User: 70.234.148.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- User: 71.153.169.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- User: 70.234.147.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to:
- 1st revert: December 10, 2008 edit by User:70.128.102.146 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 2nd revert: December 17, 2008 edit by User:71.153.163.186 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 3rd revert: December 17, 2008 edit by User:70.234.126.249 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 4th revert: December 17, 2008 edit by User:70.234.148.18 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 5th revert: December 18, 2008 edit by User:71.153.169.28 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 6th revert: December 18, 2008 edit by User:71.153.169.28 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 7th revert: December 19, 2008 edit by User:71.153.169.28 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 8th revert: December 23, 2008 edit by User:70.234.147.98 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- 9th revert: December 24, 2008 edit by User:70.234.147.98 from the Tulsa, Oklahoma region.
- Diff of 3RR warning:
- Edit warring notice for User:70.234.147.98
- Edit warring notice for User:71.153.169.28
The IP editor from Tulsa, Oklahoma has been consistently deleting one particular paragraph, a paragraph about multiple entry horn technology which happens to hold three out of four references contained in the article. The IP editor has occasionally engaged in Talk:Horn speaker discussion saying that the article needs to have additional paragraphs added in order to make the article balanced in viewpoint. I, too, would like to see the article expanded to contain more horn speaker technologies, and I suggested the tried-and-true chronological framework for introducing each important new horn speaker development, its time frame and its inventor. I made an initial search in patented horn speaker inventions and listed this on the talk page as a source for some of the future article expansion. The IP editor from Tulsa, however, has not wavered from insisting that the paragraph about multiple entry horn technology should NOT be in the article until full expansion of the article has been reached. I see no compelling reason why the paragraph can't remain in place during the expansion process. Binksternet (talk) 02:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- S-protected - dynamic nature of the IP makes it impossible to issue a block without substantial collateral damage. S-protecting instead. --B (talk) 06:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
User:75.51.76.94 reported by Foofighter20x (talk) (Result: Note left)
- Three-revert rule violation on
Talk:Ron Paul (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Ron Paul|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 75.51.76.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 03:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC
- 16:57, 24 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 17:00, 24 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 17:01, 24 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 17:01, 24 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 02:59, 25 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 03:01, 25 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 15:34, 25 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
- 01:43, 26 December 2008 (edit summary: "/* Ultra-Hyper-Mega-POV */")
I know this may seem a little ridiculous, but this guy keeps edit warring with Sinebot. It added his sig to a comment, and he keeps removing, even after people have asked him not to do so. — Foofighter20x (talk) 03:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- This one is a toughey! But his comments do seem to be overly aggressive anyway. I'll leave him a welcome message and ask him if he'd like any help, and I'll leave a gentle note about the four tildes. ScarianCall me Pat! 03:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I've left a welcome temp. and a note. Hopefully AGF'll solve this one. I wouldn't want to block or prot, obviously, as this guy is clearly relatively new. Message me if he comes back again. ScarianCall me Pat! 04:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! Foofighter20x (talk) 10:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
64.255.180.58 reported by Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (Result: Caution issued)
- Page: List of television stations in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: 64.255.180.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- 64.255.180.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- 64.255.180.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- 64.255.180.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- 64.255.180.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
(possibly an user with a dynamic IP address)
- Previous version reverted to: [8]
- Diff of 3RR warning: [13]
The page was split about a week ago, and now this user keeps reverting to the pre-split version. Doesn't answer to explanation requests on his talk page, or anywhere else for what it matters. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've issued a final caution at User talk:64.255.180.64. The edit warring was small in quantity and appears to have been made by an anonymous and relatively inexperienced editor who is ignorant of our site's policies; my caution should bring him up to date with our communal norms on edit warring. (Side note: In the event of further edit warring by this editor, I would advise a preventative block—with the rationale being previous warnings would seem to have had no effect.) AGK 17:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Prophaniti reported by Landon1980 (Result: 3 days)
- Page: Thousand Foot Krutch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Prophaniti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [14]
See block log, user has been blocked pretty recently for edit warring, one block was for edit warring on this same article I believe. These diffs are just in the past 24 hours, it has been going on for a few days. Prophaniti is reverting my edits, another user's, and an IP's. The IP is also edit warring. Landon1980 (talk) 12:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Administrator note Blocked User:Prophaniti for 3 days. — Aitias // discussion 15:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
IP adress 154.20.40.205 reported by Elbutler (Result: Blocked for evasion)
- User: 154.20.40.205
IP adress of recently blocked Simulation12 (blocked for harrassment and edit-warring), the IP was only blocked for a month originally. Repeatley re-adding candaian airdates ignoring the discussion on the talk page, just saying that it should be a candaian show, and that's "she making fair for everyone". Elbutler (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked for evasion - Simulation12 (talk · contribs) has been indefinitely blocked and is not permitted to edit Wikipedia. If he/she wishes to appeal that block, then he/she may use the {{unblock}} template, email the blocking admin, email unblock-en, or contact the arbitration committee. --B (talk) 22:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
3RR Violation (Result: Warned, Lame)
Discospinster has reverted my edits more than three times in the following article, despite warning:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S&action=history
This is in violation of the Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule. The proper course of action would be to find someone else to revert the edit(s) if it/they were so wrong, to achieve consensus. He has done this belatedly, but do note the inflexible nature of such violations - it is a gross violation of Wikipedia conduct. --82.5.174.194 (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Warned. This anon, 82.5.174.194 (talk · contribs) was sweeping through multiple articles, making controversial changes without discussion, and also passed 3RR themselves at V. I recommend that everyone take a break at this point, but if there any further reverts, an immediate block should be imposed. --Elonka 22:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) You violated the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule on this article as well:
- What do you expect me to do now? — Aitias // discussion 22:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- A few other articles were affected as well, see User:3RRBot/bot reported disruption and 3RR violations. Since both editors passed 3RR, but both seem to have voluntarily stopped, I don't think a block of either would be useful at this point. But if there are any further reverts, a block is definitely warranted to protect the project from further disruption. --Elonka 22:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Page: Reformed Episcopal Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Oresteia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Diff of 3RR warning: [28]
User is oddly familiar with Wikipedia terminology for a brand new editor. Also engaging in apparently non-good-faith edits at Episcopal Church (United States), Anglican Province of the Southern Cone, and is now chasing my edits around wikipedia reverting them. See Psalms, James the Just, Order of St. Benedict (Anglican), etc. Tb (talk) 05:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
See also a violation now on Anglican Province of the Southern Cone:
Tb (talk) 05:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Page: Ohio Patriot Act (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Spotfixer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I'm in the middle of what is on track to be a pretty epic edit war. I've been going through some categories and tagging something things for references and deleting unsourced material. At some point Spotfixer objected to what I was doing and started reverting my edits. I then left him a few messages and changed most of them back then he left me some messages and and re-reverted the most of the edits. We're probably both at fault here to some extent I'd just like to preempt an all-out edit war, clarify as to the legitimacy of the edits and move on. - Schrandit (talk) 16:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, Schrandit has been engaging in wholesale violations of NPOV by attacking any article that goes against his conservative religious beliefs. He's abusing the citation request mechanism and generally showing extreme bias. I am proud of the corrections I made and will continue to make them. However, I have no edit-warred so far and will not begin to do so, either. Spotfixer (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Everything that I removed had been tagged as unsourced for a reasonable amount of time and was removed in accordance with WP: Unsourced material. Leave my religion out of this. - Schrandit (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Administrator note Are three reverts more than three reverts? No. Thus, I can't see a violation of the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. — Aitias // discussion 16:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
ITSENJOYABLE reported by Squash Racket (Result: 24 hours)
- Page: Transylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: ITSENJOYABLE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [36]
- 1st revert: 17:09, 26 December 2008
- 2nd revert: 18:49, 26 December 2008
- 3rd revert: 16:00, 27 December 2008
- 4th revert: 16:09, 27 December 2008
- 5th revert: 16:51, 27 December 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 18:51, 26 December 2008
The user reverted the article about six times in a day against four(!) different editors. Clearly doesn't want to stop, he even deletes referenced material from Britannica and arbitrarily changes what the references actually say.
I have not made a single revert in the past 24 hours. Squash Racket (talk) 17:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
NoCal100 reported by Ashley kennedy3 (Result: No violation)
- Page: Jordan Valley Unified Water Plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: NoCal100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [37]
- Diff of 3RR warning: [link]
I warned NoCal100 and NoCal100 considered the warning as trolling here. As NoCal100 does not appear to want it taken seriously I've reported it hereAshley kennedy3 (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
User:Ashley kennedy3 reported by User:NoCal100 (Result: No violation)
- Page: Jordan Valley Unified Water Plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Ashley kennedy3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: Complex reverts - a previous version is provided for each revert, below
- 1st revert: [41] - reverts the following edits by CasualObserver'48: [42]
- 2nd revert: [43] - reverts the following edits by NoCal100: [44]
- 3rd revert: [45] - same as previous one
- 4th revert: [46] - reverts the following edits by Gatoclass: [47] (undoes the insertion of "eventually")
- Diff of 3RR warning: per the above report, the user is well aware of the 3RR, and has been blocked for edit warring before. NoCal100 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
NoCal100 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- No violation - fourth revert is EXTREMELY ticky tacky and there was clearly no intention to edit war. --B (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Page: Talk:Ctrl+Alt+Del
- User: Thrindel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [48]
- 1st revert: [49]
- 2nd revert: [50]
- 3rd revert: [51]
- 4th revert: [52]
- 5th revert: [53]
- 6th revert: [54]
- 7th revert: [55]
- 8th revert: [56]
- 9th revert: [57]
- 10th revert: [58]
- 11th revert: [59]
- Diff of 3RR warning: [60]
I have repeatedly tried to bring this to a discussion rather than a revert war or a request for intervention, but have frankly grown weary of trying to keep a level head on this and am requesting intervention after putting forth my arguement on both the page in question, the user's talk page and my own. Nilzy (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Could you please provide diff links rather than those above? :) — Aitias // discussion 01:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Reporter blocked - Thrindel's removals are covered by the BLP exemption. --B (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Seems like a good call. — Aitias // discussion 01:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
ArabH reported by Iamawesome800 (Result: Indef)
- Page: Jerusalem
- User: ArabH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous Version [61]
'
- There's a total of 7 reverts located at:
- 1st Revert: [62]
- 2nd revert: [63]
- 3rd revert: [64]
- 4th revert: [65]
- 5th revert: [66]
- 6th revert: [67]
- 7th revert: [68]
He's been told multiple times by multiple users to not keep redirecting the page and he's also been warned for this edit war.--Iamawesome800 19:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- ArabH has been blocked indef by Aitias as a vandal-only account. EdJohnston (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Semitransgenic reported by David Gerard (Result: 24 hours)
- Page: WP:NOR
- user: Semitransgenic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version [69]
- Four identical reverts, in quick succession, to a policy page no less: [70] [71] [72] [73] - David Gerard (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Administrator note Blocked user for 24 hours. — Aitias // discussion 19:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
User:212.32.112.75 reported by User:Arthur Rubin (Result: 24 hours)
- Page: 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: 212.32.112.75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [link]
- Diff of 3RR warning: 00:07
Even if the first one wasn't a revert, which I think it is, all the others were to the same version. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EdJohnston (talk) 02:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
KoshVorlon reported by Damiens.rf (Result: 31 hours)
- Page: Dwight Lauderdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: KoshVorlon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [74]
- Diff of 3RR warning: [80]
Various editors (like Nishkid64[81], Smashville[82] and BradV[83]) have tried to explain KoshVorlon about the inappropriateness of his edits on his talk page, but he insists on reverting back to his revision. --Damiens.rf 14:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Bukubku reported by Caspian blue (Result:blocked 48 hours)
- Page: Empress Myeongseong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Bukubku (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: 2008-08-23T21:31:26
- 1st revert: 2008-12-28T17:31:37
- 2nd revert: 2008-12-29T15:19:45
- 3rd revert: 2008-12-29T15:22:18 (consecutive revert)
- 4th revert: 2008-12-29T15:37:53
- 5th revert: 2008-12-29T15:38:39
- 6th revert:12-29T15:54:57 (consecutive revert)
- Diff of 3RR warning: [84] The user was recently blocked for 3RR violation and gaming the 3RR system.[85]
- Bukubku clearly has acknowledged the 3RR rule given this.[86] This whole edit warrning was initiated by Bukuku because he has misused WP:Primary sources without confirmation procedures by disputers and disregarded WP:Consensus. He has also deliberately inserted WP:Original research and blanking information anything unfavorable for his taste. More problem is that he also has inserted the same unconfirmed sources to other related articles Joseon Dynasty, House of Yi, Miura Goro, Woo Jang-choon and others. Some of his such malpractices can be seen at Talk:Woo Jang-choon#Don't delete " {"{fact}"}" and "<"references /">" . Talk:Woo Jang-choon#Bukubku's blanked contents / requested inline citations. Thus, he has tried to rewrite history to divert the blame of the assassination of Empress Myeongseong. Also he has mispresented book and web sources to other articles such as Talk:Imo Incident#Massacre and No Original research. This kind of practices is extremely harmful to our project; building the constructive encyclopedia. Since his latest block does not change him a bit, a longer block would prevent this ongoing disruption. --Caspian blue 16:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 48 hours --Smashvilletalk 18:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Historiographer reported by NAZONAZO (Result: 31 hours)
- Page: Empress Myeongseong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- User: Historiographer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: [link] Because it is too complex[87], I'm not able to conclude what version is appropriate.
- 1st revert: 2008-12-29T15:12:54
- 2nd revert: 2008-12-29T15:15:30
- 3rd revert: 2008-12-29T15:15:46
- 4th revert: 2008-12-29T15:16:00
- Diff of 3RR warning: [88] Caspian blue do warning[89].
Sorry for poor English.
Though Historiographer know that there are Korean assassins, he say "Most of them are Japanese." and delete "Koreans"[90] or add only "Japanese"[91]. Therefore, it seem that there are only Japanese assassins. It is POV. And he reduce number of Koreans who are related to the assassination[92]. It is unfair.--NAZONAZO (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Administrator note 31 hours. — Aitias // discussion 19:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Zara1709 self report(Result: 12 hours)
- Page: Adolf Hitler
- User: Zara1709 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Attention, Cynicism: I've done everything I could, but it just isn't enough. A historian has written a controversial, but good book about Religion in Nazi Germany, where it is among many other things pointed out that Hitler can be classified as "nominally Catholic". This is explain in a great detail on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Of course, to paraphrase that historian himself, that Hitler as the world-historical metaphor for human evil and wickedness should in some way have been a member of a Christian Church can be regarded by many only as unthinkable, but it is fact. I patiently and, I hope, skilfully, explained this to the editors who removed it repeatedly from the article, but I have not achieved anything. Accurate scholarship can unearth the whole offense from Luther until no that has driven a culture mad; find what occurred at Linz, what huge image made a psychopathic god, but Wikipedia will not be able to present the result of this scholarship. Steigmann-Gall certainly is a reliable source on Nazism and Religion, and I can not leave the last edit summary comment standing as it is. I know that it is likely that I might get banned for formally breaking the 3-revert-rule, but I have to revert. (Zara1709 (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC))
- Blocked – for a period of 12 hours Since this editor reported himself here at the noticeboard, no 3RR warning is needed. I think any admin should unblock him if he agrees to wait for a Talk page consensus before restoring the claim about Hitler's Catholicism to the article. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
User:RMHED reported by 62.103.147.54 (talk) (Result: )
- Three-revert rule violation on
Manning_Marable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). RMHED (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 23:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC
- 03:15, 29 December 2008 (edit summary: "Asserts imp/sig")
- 22:17, 29 December 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 260754299 by 62.103.147.54 (talk)There are several assertions of imp/sig")
- 22:29, 29 December 2008 (edit summary: "Reverted edits by 62.103.147.54 (talk) to last version by RMHED")
- 22:58, 29 December 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 260760880 by 62.103.147.54 (talk)I have given my reasons for removing the CSD several times.")
Seems to keep doing this in similar cases, such as Prof._Dr._Rahimi_Tabar. and others that can be found in his contributions page. From his talk page a couple of other users seem to have been unhappy with similar reverts as well.
Thanks, Anthony
—62.103.147.54 (talk) 23:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)