Chaotic Enby (talk | contribs) m →User:Swajyothi reported by User:Chaotic Enby (Result: ): edit opening comment Tag: CD |
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 470: | Line 470: | ||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
== [[User:67.1.135.167]] reported by [[User:Tacyarg]] (Result: ) == |
== [[User:67.1.135.167]] reported by [[User:Tacyarg]] (Result: Blocked) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Huguenots}} |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Huguenots}} |
||
Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
IP editor adding information about what looks like their own organisation to this article. Mostly unsourced, though the last but one attempt to add the information referenced a self-published document. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 01:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
IP editor adding information about what looks like their own organisation to this article. Mostly unsourced, though the last but one attempt to add the information referenced a self-published document. [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 01:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:{{AN3|b}} – 31 hours for edit warring. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Swajyothi]] reported by [[User:Chaotic Enby]] (Result: ) == |
== [[User:Swajyothi]] reported by [[User:Chaotic Enby]] (Result: ) == |
Revision as of 01:59, 11 February 2024
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
User:2003:d2:ff39:b494:f519:d6da:f330:2793 reported by User:Slatersteven (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
Page: Mutual UFO Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2003:d2:ff39:b494:f519:d6da:f330:2793 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [5]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [6]
Comments:
An SPA that seems to be here to right great wrongs about this. Slatersteven (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
And still at it [[7]] so this will continue until a block is imposed. Slatersteven (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked for 24 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Genre-warring and removal of sourced information on multiple pages (Result: Warned both reported users)
Across (at least) (Don't Go Back to) Rockville and Supernatural Superserious, there has been back-and-forth about removing sourced genre categories by Seasider53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (and some reverts by IMMAEDITTHISPAGE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). I tried to intervene on the talk pages of both articles, but I do not believe that Seasider53 is discussing in good faith or is particularly interested in collaborating after his last post, so I am escalating here, because the back-and-forth is not productive and I would like an admin to intervene to keep this from escalating or continuing. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion has been taking place, which I'm happy to continue with. And there has been no input from IMMAEDITTHISPAGE so far, likely because they haven't yet had time. I've provided valid reasons (and links to the relevant guideline) why the genre should not be included which have not been sufficiently addressed ("The inherent nature of music genres is that they are arbitrary opinions.") Seasider53 (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. And really, this looks like you meant to post it at AN/I. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- I read the above instructions and it doesn't oblige me to use that style. Is there some obligation that I'm missing? The problem is edit-warring and I'm trying to get it to stop. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- From the instructions: "The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from" (emphasis mine).-- Ponyobons mots 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- That I did. Thanks/sorry. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- From the instructions: "The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from" (emphasis mine).-- Ponyobons mots 19:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Warned both reported users ([8] [9]). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- Resolved– ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Owais Al Qarni reported by User:GraziePrego (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
Page: Ashraf Ali Thanwi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Owais Al Qarni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 22:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) to 22:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- 22:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Owais Al Qarni-এর করা 1205067610 নং সংস্করণ পুনরুদ্ধার করা হয়েছে (পুনরুদ্ধারকারী)"
- 22:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 19:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC) to 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- 19:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Reverted edits by Zuck28 (talk) to last version by Owais Al Qarni"
- 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 18:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Reverted edits by Zuck28 (talk) to last version by Owais Al Qarni"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Edit warring with zero discussion. Other user is also edit warring back. GraziePrego (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- There are instances of edit-warring on Syed Mehboob Rizwi also. I believe it is worthless to change Sunni into "Deobandi"-alone, and as such there should be a wider RfC that solves this puzzle. Either only mentioning Islamic scholar, or if mentioning of the movement they have had relations with in "lede" is any necessary. I reverted one of @Zuck28's edits and they appeared constructive in that manner and didn't revert me. However, I'm uncertain why they are engaging in an edit-war over here. If someone is constantly reverting, a good signal to to right away start a talk page discussion (if they appear non-responsive on their own user talk page). I suggest changing these articles to as they were and issue hard warnings to both, and initiate an RfC right away. ─ Aafī (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- @TheAafi @GraziePrego
- I have made constructive edits with edit summaries, and I have also initiated a discussion on @Owais Al Qarni's talk page. However, it was they who intentionally reverted the edits without providing a summary and deleted my discussion from their talk page.
- I value constructive edits and believe that individuals with insight and understanding are inclined to explain and substantiate their perspectives rather than simply reverting without explanation. I refrain from reverting significant information without providing comments, acknowledging that others may offer valuable insights. Despite my efforts to engage with them, I find them to be unapproachable and discourteous. Zuck28 (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours While not a 3RR violation the constant revert across several articles with no attempt at discussion or even an edit summary is disruptive. - Aoidh (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Zuck28 reported by User:GraziePrego (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
Page: Ashraf Ali Thanwi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Zuck28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 20:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC) to 20:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- 20:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "wp:EDITWAR unexplained RRR"
- 20:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Unexplained wp:EW"
- 20:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 19:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Unexplained reversion"
- 13:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Do not undo any edit without any reason or reference. Undid revision 1204403225 by Owais Al Qarni (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Edit warring with zero discussion. Other user is also edit warring back. GraziePrego (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- @GraziePregoKindly review my edit history, and you’ll see that every time I reverted anything, I added comments in the summary. I also made efforts to engage in discussions, but @Owais Al Qarn removed my discussion from their talk page. Additionally, they were using Bangla language, which may not be suitable on the English Wikipedia platform. Zuck28 (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours As with the above report, no attempt at discussion. Edit summaries are not discussion and their edit summaries constantly cite edit warring as reasons for their reversions, meaning they are well aware of the edit warring policy and choose to engage in edit warring across multiple articles regardless. - Aoidh (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User:81.170.20.2 reported by User:AntiDionysius (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
Page: Kemi Badenoch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 81.170.20.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 00:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 00:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 00:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205152103 by AntiDionysius (talk)"
- 00:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 00:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 00:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 00:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205124146 by Czello (talk)"
- 00:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Beliefs */"
- 22:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Take it to the talk page"
- 18:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC) "Summary of the views section in light of latest developments related to rhetoric, stance on culture, lgbtq and race issues. Fully cited."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 00:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours While it doesn't appear to be a WP:3RR violation as the fourth revert above doesn't appear to be a revert, they are edit warring regardless. Aoidh (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User:174.91.209.79 reported by User:Kenquenito (Result: Page protected)
Page: List of highest-grossing Philippine films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 174.91.209.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
[13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments:
\\
On February 4, 2024, I reported User:174.91.209.79 for reverting the article List of highest-grossing Philippine films. He keeps adding the film Maid in Malacañang in the list and claims that the film grossed P700 million in the box office. However, he cannot provide reliable sources. He keeps citing IlokaKnows and Politiko, which are blog sites. The sites don't even have a working About Us page to verify that they are trusted organizations. Another "source" he provides is the tabloid named Bandera. It was discussed on Talk:List of highest-grossing Philippine films that 'Bandera is an editorial tabloid, which is clearly an unreliable source. Bandera mentioned Darryl Yap (the director) as a source, and Yap himself, mentioned Wikipedia as his own source. This is a clear example of circular reporting.' However, this user noted in his latest edits that 'we should accept the truth'. [24] He has been doing it since January 18, 2024.
Despite receiving warning from User:Aoidh, he reverted the page once again on February 7 at 00:22 [25] and on February 8 at 21:31 [26].
I'm a bit ignorant about Wikipedia's 3RR rule but I'm sure that he's committing violations by forcing Wikipedia's readers to include something on an article without citing reliable sources just to spread misinformation. Kenquenito (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- No 3RR violation here but it's still edit warring, which is actionable. Even that this is a slow-paced edit war I suspect page protection might be necessary. — Czello (music) 11:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Seasider53 reported by User:2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (Result: Declined)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Page: Cowal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Dunoon Pier (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Seasider53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: —
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: —
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: —
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: —
Comments:
This user in my view abuses their admin privilege, by continually removing any mention of cowal from articles that are in the Cowal area. They have been doing this for years!2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Cowal
I added Greenheart wood piles to the Dunoon Pier article and linked to a disambiguation, but instead of fixing the link they just reverted!2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Also this user leaves abusive messages on talk pages see here for example [[31]] Quote "Are you okay? Seasider53 (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)" and on [[32]] to see past comments I have posted with NO reply!
This user has in the past "stopped" me from editing as I cannot be bothered with their unhelpful revisions. I am now raising this complaint as a last resort.2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
As you can tell I am no Wikipedia expert. But this user is proving to my mind to be unnecessarily unhelpful. 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This user continually reverts with NO explanation, rather than fixing edits made in good faith. 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Declined: filer needs to address objections before restoring problematic content and use informative edit summaries when reverting others. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Really!! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- So it is OK to leave "Are you okay?" on a talk page? 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- No. Seasider53, please avoid comments like that. IP, your style of communication will come off as yelling to many users, and you should consider changing it up. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Another example. "It wasn’t an oversight. I just can’t be bothered to clean up all the time. Seasider53 (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)"
- So, this editor cannot "be bothered"! They are under NO obligation to edit!!!!!! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please consider creating a user account so that your discussions can be centralised. Using multiple IPs (not your fault) over several years makes it harder to maintain discussions. You seem to edit well; you just don't respond well to other editors' copyedits to maintain the longstanding quality of articles. Seasider53 (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not mind constructive revisions but, the continuous removal of edits/blanking of edits, rather than fixing is pointless. You spend just as much time fixing as blanking/reverting!! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- You seemingly do, which is why we're here. Anyway, this is not the place to discuss editing gripes. Seasider53 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sigh, totally missing the point! You revert/blank edits, rather than fixing edits made in good faith! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- You seemingly do, which is why we're here. Anyway, this is not the place to discuss editing gripes. Seasider53 (talk) 15:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- An account is optional!!!! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Latest revert????? On page Glendaruel.
- SO[edit]
- So adding sub-headings and Main Article is now a problem? So is adding Clan Fletcher hereditary at Dunans? So is adding a ref where there was none, also a problem??
- Really???? Labelled as unconstructive????? 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:9A0:2FD6:BE18:320 (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:9A0:2FD6:BE18:320 (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am starting to feel that a vendetta is the only way to describe this!!!2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:9A0:2FD6:BE18:320 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do not mind constructive revisions but, the continuous removal of edits/blanking of edits, rather than fixing is pointless. You spend just as much time fixing as blanking/reverting!! 2A00:23C6:CE0F:6D01:B822:45EF:F13E:14A1 (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please consider creating a user account so that your discussions can be centralised. Using multiple IPs (not your fault) over several years makes it harder to maintain discussions. You seem to edit well; you just don't respond well to other editors' copyedits to maintain the longstanding quality of articles. Seasider53 (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This has been declined and is now closed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
User:2601:80:4781:47D0:99DB:228B:8EBF:BD83 reported by User:Tacyarg (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)
Page: Ronald Colson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:80:4781:47D0:99DB:228B:8EBF:BD83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 17:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Songwriting and production credits */"
- 16:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Songwriting and production credits */"
- 05:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Added facts about Flip"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 07:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Ronald Colson."
- 16:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Ronald Colson."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Probably same person as blocked user / sockpuppet JoelMaxey and TheRealRonald, and IP editor 2601:80:4781:47D0:99DB:228B:8EBF:BD83 - adding same text. Tacyarg (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks (2601:80:4781:47D0:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Dougwash reported by User:Zaquezipe (Result: Both blocked 2 weeks)
Page: Colombia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dougwash (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia&oldid=1204807978 [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- [1] Reversion #1 by Dougwash
- [2] Reversion #2 by Dougwash
- [3] Reversion #3 by Dougwash
- [4] Reversion #4 by Dougwash
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Removal of
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User talk:Dougwash#About reverting an estimate of the ethnic population
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: User talk:Dougwash#About reverting an estimate of the ethnic population
Comments:
- User also engaged in personal attacks due to my name being Zaquezipe within his talk page and my talk page. Also did not show civility and was not willing to listen to my point of view of the matter, kept reverting an estimation that doesn’t try to paint itself as fact but rather a gathering of the sources already used in those pages to be used in the Colombia page. Zaquezipe (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Both editors blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia&oldid=1205188290
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia&oldid=1205537395
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia&oldid=1205550148
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia&oldid=1205557361
- ^ "Lb1 hosted at ImgBB".
- ^ Schwartzman, Simon. "Étnia, condiciones de vida y discriminación" (PDF).
- ^ Bernal, Felipe Andrés (2017). "Geografía humana de Colombia" (PDF) (in Spanish). Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
User:Jabadaba reported by User:Funcrunch (Result: Partially blocked for 2 weeks)
Page: Aston "Family Man" Barrett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jabadaba (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [33]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [38]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [39]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [40]
Comments:
Apparent WP:SPA is repeatedly reinserting unsourced information and removing hatnote link. Note that this page is currently linked from "In the News" under "Recent deaths" on the main page of the English Wikipedia. Funcrunch (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User:79.54.217.132 reported by User:Belbury (Result: Page protected)
Page: Cornetto (pastry) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 79.54.217.132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 21:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205510683 by 2800:430:1202:7B8:F813:AAFF:FE93:9EF (talk) stop the vandalism and go to the discussion page"
- 20:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205484500 by 190.63.96.117 (talk) No,it says it's similar to kipfler"
- 19:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205478607 by 2800:430:1384:A210:1DF:3D5E:E406:953 (talk) vandalism"
- 19:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205473968 by 190.63.96.117 (talk) No, it's a different product"
- 18:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205467365 by 190.63.96.117 (talk) the references don't say it's Austrian"
- 18:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205458142 by 2800:430:1384:A210:1DF:3D5E:E406:953 (talk)"
- 17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205434598 by 2800:430:1384:A210:1DF:3D5E:E406:953 (talk) Respect the sources and the truth. Don't vandalize"
- 17:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205414961 by 2800:430:1384:A210:A098:9FF:FEEC:F41E (talk) vandalisme"
- 08:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205182756 by 2800:430:1384:A210:50F0:5FF:FE8F:CFB8 (talk) vandalism"
- 01:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1205165190 by 2800:430:1384:A210:B887:45FF:FE45:7039 (talk) restore"
- 01:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 18:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Cornetto (pastry)."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 18:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC) on Talk:Cornetto (pastry) "/* 79.54.217.132 */ new section"
Comments:
Restored the same edit to this article five times before someone opened a talk page discussion and I gave this IP a 3RR warning. They gave a cursory reply to that discussion and went on to revert the cornetto article six more times. That article is now protected, but they're still continuing the same kind of behaviour at cappuccino, which they've reverted four times in the past 36 hours. Belbury (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- The user, an anonymous IP, started vandalize croissant before reaching any kind of consensus, without you doing anything.
- And I tried to reason on the discussion page but he refuse to, all while you witness without doing anything.
- Furthermore, this behaviour remind that of one who was permanently banned from wikipedia 79.54.217.132 (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Windawindawinda reported by User:Equine-man (Result: Indefinitely blocked)
Page: David Windsor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Windawindawinda (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 12:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "←Removed redirect to Edward VIII"
- Consecutive edits made from 11:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) to 12:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- 11:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 12:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Adding alternate name"
- 16:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Adding more details, Contributions in another tv show"
- Consecutive edits made from 12:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 12:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 12:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "Adding more references"
- 12:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 09:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 11:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Consecutive edits made from 14:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC) to 15:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- 14:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Adding references"
- 15:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 14:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC) "Adding references"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Notice: Conflict of interest on David Windsor."
- 12:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Final warning: Ownership of articles on Edward VIII."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Problem editor, COI edits, numerous editors have requested him to stop, yet he continues. Equine-man (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop redirecting David Windsor page(s) to Edward VIII, Duke of Windsor, or Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David, Former King of the United Kingdom, it is vandalism Windawindawinda Windawindawinda (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Parthi1200 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Page protected, user blocked indefinitely)
Page: M. G. Ramachandran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Parthi1200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 10:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) to 10:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- 10:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 10:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- Consecutive edits made from 09:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) to 09:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- 09:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 09:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 09:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 09:59, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- Consecutive edits made from 20:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 23:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 20:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 20:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 23:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- Consecutive edits made from 19:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC) to 19:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- 19:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
- 19:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life and background */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 10:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on M. G. Ramachandran ."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "/* Background */ Comment"
Comments:
This user and some IPs keep changing the sourced ethnic background of the subject. We also had a discussion regarding itin the talk page. This user and the IPs were also requested to engage, but they don't seem to listen. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
User:فروغ السلطنە reported by User:Aintabli (Result: )
Page: Qajar dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: فروغ السلطنە (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 17:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 17:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 10:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 19:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC) ""
- 11:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 11:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Qajar dynasty."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
User:67.1.135.167 reported by User:Tacyarg (Result: Blocked)
Page: Huguenots (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 67.1.135.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 00:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) "Restored Carter Blue Star Anchorage and Charity"
- Consecutive edits made from 00:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC) to 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- 00:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC) "Restored the listing of the Carter Blue Star anchorage and charity"
- 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC) "/* United States */"
- 18:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Reinstated notation of the Carter Blue Star, a recognized Huguenot Anchorage and we have supplied documents"
- 00:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "The Carter Blue Star of Tucson Arizona is an active Huguenot anchorage and charity established by Clary duBosc Lucas Bass Carter in 2023. This evidence is available through a registered letter to the French Huguenot Church of South Carolina. I recommend that some who says "wikipedia doesn't want me" should .... Leave. Thank you. Clary du Bosc Lucas Bass Carter"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 21:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) "Notice: Conflict of interest on Huguenots."
- 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Huguenots."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
IP editor adding information about what looks like their own organisation to this article. Mostly unsourced, though the last but one attempt to add the information referenced a self-published document. Tacyarg (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – 31 hours for edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Swajyothi reported by User:Chaotic Enby (Result: )
Page: Venkata Manoj Kumar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Swajyothi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1206011496
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Special:Diff/1206015844
- Special:Diff/1206017510
- Special:Diff/1206018634
- Special:Diff/1206023791
- Special:Diff/1206025448
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1206026196
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article user talk page: Special:Diff/1206018481
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1206027934
Comments:
Repeated removal of A7 and BLPPROD templates with no explanations given. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 01:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)