Line 282: | Line 282: | ||
{{ping|DocWatson42}} refiled for you. [[User:PAVLOV|PAVLOV]] ([[User talk:PAVLOV|talk]]) 16:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
{{ping|DocWatson42}} refiled for you. [[User:PAVLOV|PAVLOV]] ([[User talk:PAVLOV|talk]]) 16:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Blocked''' for 6 months. 9 prior blocks for edit warring, plus the compounding incivility and personal attacks, is sufficient. We've seen enough from this person for a while. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 16:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Blocked''' for 6 months. 9 prior blocks for edit warring, plus the compounding incivility and personal attacks, is sufficient. We've seen enough from this person for a while. --[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 16:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
== [[User:Toa Nidhiki05]] reported by [[User:Earthh]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Morbius (film)}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Toa Nidhiki05}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# {{diff2|1083953742|19:17, 21 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083950686 by Earthh (talk): This critic's single review is not indicative of anything, and we already have a reception section stacked with disproprotionate Leto praise. Please take this to the talk." |
|||
# {{diff2|1083950272|18:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)}} "Restored revision 1083946133 by 196.4.56.11 (talk): Source is not derivative of RT and does not attribute its specific claims to RT." |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1083931372|diff=1083941328|label=Consecutive edits made from 17:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC) to 03:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1083939522|17:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)}} "+Times of India +Yahoo News" |
|||
## {{diff2|1083939609|17:43, 21 April 2022 (UCT)}} "/* Critical response */" |
|||
## {{diff2|1083940436|17:48, 21 April 2022 (UCT)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1083941134|17:52, 21 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083939609 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk): Reverting; my edit summary was not added for some reason?" |
|||
## {{diff2|1083941328|17:54, 21 April 2022 (UCT)}} "WP:BOLD changes per WP:RS and WP:LEDE. Removing praise of Leto from lede as we have conflicting sources on this. Removing direct citations, which are generally not put in ledes. Including specific details rather than citing to RT directly; we have multiple outlets to draw from here now." |
|||
# {{diff2|1083648289|23:24, 19 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083646967 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk): Please take this to the talk, where discussion is ongoing" |
|||
# {{diff2|1083646967 23:13, 19 April 2022 (UCT)}} "No consensus, and new wording actually ERASES reliably sourced stuff" |
|||
# {{diff2|1083491300 03:06, 19 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083394828 by Indagate (talk): Not properly sourced" |
|||
# {{diff2|1083365172 12:40, 18 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083330002 by Endwise (talk): Reviews were not "generaly" negative, and Leto's performance was not broadly praised." |
|||
# {{diff2|1083100820 01:21, 17 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1083039710 by AbsolutelyFiring (talk): Inaccurate." |
|||
# {{diff2|1082902032 19:55, 15 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1082895033 by Erik (talk): Ongoing talk discussion" |
|||
# {{diff2|1082860456 14:30, 15 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Don’t lie about what sources say, Earthh. That second source doesn’t praise Leto." |
|||
# {{diff2|1082717967 17:04, 14 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1082704825 by AbsolutelyFiring (talk): Not supported by sources" |
|||
# {{diff2|1082598170 02:04, 14 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1082558229 by Evope (talk)" |
|||
# {{diff2|1082533788 18:12, 13 April 2022 (UCT)}} "You adding the Leto praise yourself and revert anyone who removes it, <nowiki>{{u|User:Earthh}}</nowiki>. There is no consensus for including this - please continue discussing on the talk page, where you can make your case far more successfully than through edit warring to include it." |
|||
# {{diff2|1082525139 17:11, 13 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Please take this to the talk. There's no consensus and the claim directly contradicts sources" |
|||
# {{diff2|1082338372 16:34, 12 April 2022 (UCT)}} "continue to object to singling out leto's performance for praise when an equal or greater number of reviews actively criticized it" |
|||
# {{diff2|1081536102 01:26, 8 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Restored revision 1081527406 by GoingBatty (talk): Please take this to the talk" |
|||
# {{diff2|1081506391 20:47, 7 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Leto's also received criticism, so I'm not sure mentioning it as praiseworthy is accurate" |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
# {{diff2|1082536398|18:31, 13 April 2022 (UCT)}} |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
# {{diff2|1081588264|11:04, 8 April 2022 (UCT)}} "Morbius: new section" |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' |
|||
'''Comments:''' <br /> |
|||
I have noticed disruptive changes to the lead section of [[Morbius (film)]], which started on 7 April 2022. A first attempt to discuss was attempted on the user's talk page, but there has been no willingness to engage there. I warned the user not to continue edit-warring but I was equally ignored as my post was removed from his talkpage (which I incorrectly restored having misinterpreted [[WP:BLANKING]]; later another user explained it to me). {{u|Erik}} and I then tried to discuss on the article talk page, but were met with hostility as well. The user is doing inappropriate, accusatory edit summaries [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AToa_Nidhiki05&type=revision&diff=1082549099&oldid=1082536398][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&diff=prev&oldid=1082860456][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&diff=prev&oldid=1082533788]; he is reverting multiple users who object to his edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083491300&oldid=1083475950][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083365172&oldid=1083330466][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083100820&oldid=1083096023][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1082902032&oldid=1082895405], removing a reliably sourced and neutral statement without any acceptable reason [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083953742&oldid=1083953518][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083941328&oldid=1083941134][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083648289&oldid=1083648011] and refusing to contribute constructively to the talk page discussion in order to try to resolve the issue [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMorbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1082530224&oldid=1082529586][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMorbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083957096&oldid=1083954074]. I don't want to keep edit-warring with him but he specifically said he is not going to stop [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMorbius_%28film%29&type=revision&diff=1083957096&oldid=1083954074].--[[User:Earthh|Earthh]] ([[User talk:Earthh|talk]]) 22:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:33, 21 April 2022
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
User:Kingcutie reported by User:Tol (Result: Kingcutie blocked for a week; 23.88.128.115 blocked for 24 hours)
Page: Har Mar Superstar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Kingcutie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 22:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) to 22:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- 22:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Personal life */"
- 22:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Honors and awards */"
- Consecutive edits made from 22:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC) to 22:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- 22:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Personal life */"
- 22:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Honors and awards */"
- 22:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Honors and awards */"
- Consecutive edits made from 22:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC) to 22:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- 22:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Honors and awards */"
- 22:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Personal life */"
- 21:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Honors and awards */"
- 21:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Personal life */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 22:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Har Mar Superstar."
- 22:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Har Mar Superstar."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 22:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Edit warring */ new section"
Comments:
Repeatedly edit-warring to a version which is POV (calling allegations "community hysteria") and lumps the allegations together with an unrelated sentence about sobriety and promoting his album. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to @HarMarSuperstarred, who has also been reverting on this article (to the other version which I prefer) but has stopped since I opened a thread on the talk page and informed HarMarSuperstarred about 3RR. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- There are now two IPs continuing the edit war with Kingcutie, 23.88.128.115 and 68.168.182.136; I have given both edit warring warnings. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Kingcutie: Blocked – for a period of one week due not only to this recent edit-warring, but the harassment of other users and a pattern of long-term disruption; account seems to be an SPA with an alleged family connection to the article subject. If the software allowed a longer-term partial block to be imposed on the page and talk page in addition to this sitewide block, I would have done that too and I recommend.
23.88.128.115: Blocked – for a period of 24 hours for a clear 3RR vio. I did not block 68.168.182.136 because their activity is too minimal and only one edit really seems to have been a revert.
Should this continue I think page protection may be in order. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Kingcutie: Blocked – for a period of one week due not only to this recent edit-warring, but the harassment of other users and a pattern of long-term disruption; account seems to be an SPA with an alleged family connection to the article subject. If the software allowed a longer-term partial block to be imposed on the page and talk page in addition to this sitewide block, I would have done that too and I recommend.
User:68.196.104.136 reported by User:Wnjr (Result: Blocked 48 hours )
Page: Libs of TikTok (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 68.196.104.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [1]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- [2] "→Background Tag: Reverted"
- [3] "Should we dox everybody with whom we disagree? Tag: Reverted"
- [4] "Sensitive and unverified personal information should not be on a wikipedia article that is among the first hits when one google searches 'libs of tiktok' Tag: Reverted"
- [5] "Sensitive and unverified personal information should not be published on a wikipedia article that is among the first hits when one google searches 'libs of tiktok' Tag: Reverted"
- [6] "personal information, unverified, sensitive, very clearly endangering to her life Tags: Reverted references removed"
- [7] "Tags: Reverted references removed"
- [8] "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources." Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed"
- [9] "sensistive and unverified personal information, currently being used to launch a doxxing campaign Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed"
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [10]
Comments:
All this IP's contributions are reverts of a single page, today. Wnjr (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
User:TheEncyclopediaReader reported by User:Moxy (Result: Indefinitely blocked)
Page: Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TheEncyclopediaReader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 02:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC) "Why you reverted my edit without reason? I'm just obeying policies, linking that way the languages go against a policy, and to make it clear I'M JUST FOLLOWING POLICIES."
- Consecutive edits made from 19:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC) to 20:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- 19:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "I learned that link the dialect but just as the language Ex. English go against MOS:PIPE and WP:EASTEREGG"
- 20:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "Please for more information see this section in my talk page"
- 02:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "But United States is not linked, I do as possible to link both."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 02:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "/* What to do when your edit is reverted */ new section"
- 02:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "/* What to do when your edit is reverted */ Reply"
- 02:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Stop changes across to infobox languages mass amount of articles */ Reply"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 02:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Sea of Blue */ Reply"
Comments:
We are having an ongoing problem across many articles with mass amount of reverts. Main problem is the change of dialects in infoboxes across multiple articles eg. As a new editor I was hoping for the best..... but the fact that 90% of the edits are reverted leads us here. Moxy- 02:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Forgive me, I was confused: A user told me not to link the dialect as the language, only the language (I edited like this: French, and he also told me that I have to put two lines (I edited like this Filipino • English), and you tell me that I have to put the linked dialect as the language, which is ? So please can you tell me how do I have to edit? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- pls slow down......90 % of your edits have been reverted..... you have been invited to multiple talk pages to discuss the situation to no avail.... you just keep re implementing the same edits over and over again on multiple articles despite being reverted by multiple editors. Pls slow down.
- . Moxy- 02:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- But please explain to me how I should edit those pages that I intend to edit, my head is spinning from confusion. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:52, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Some users tell me how I have to edit it and you say the opposite, what is it then? What shape do I have to put it? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- If you're confused you just stop editing till you understand the concerns..... don't just blindly revert everyone. Don't you think it's odd that you have to change all these articles from a dialect to generic article. Moxy- 02:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Concerns? What do you mean? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have a concern: I have no idea what you are doing, and why, and I have another concern--that you do not know what you are doing. On top of that, instead of learning, you are edit warring. I'm not going to block because it's my bedtime, but the next admin might well block you--and they might block you indefinitely for a lack of competence and edit warring despite that. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- But I just applied that they told me, the way that I have to edit, I wasn’t making edit war that much so please don't fire me from Wikipedia, I was just following what you guys were telling me but got confused by a user who told me the opposite. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 03:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don't buy this. Someone told you to just revert an experienced editor? "Us guys" are telling you to stop edit warring. Drmies (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Are they new? {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roald_Dahl&diff=prev&oldid=1083482500 odd edit for new editor]. Moxy- 03:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don't buy this. Someone told you to just revert an experienced editor? "Us guys" are telling you to stop edit warring. Drmies (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I explained to you what happens when you get reverted why are you not joining conversations about this? Moxy- 03:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- But I just applied that they told me, the way that I have to edit, I wasn’t making edit war that much so please don't fire me from Wikipedia, I was just following what you guys were telling me but got confused by a user who told me the opposite. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 03:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have a concern: I have no idea what you are doing, and why, and I have another concern--that you do not know what you are doing. On top of that, instead of learning, you are edit warring. I'm not going to block because it's my bedtime, but the next admin might well block you--and they might block you indefinitely for a lack of competence and edit warring despite that. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Concerns? What do you mean? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- But please explain to me how I should edit those pages that I intend to edit, my head is spinning from confusion. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 02:52, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
You're right, why didn't I think about it before? I can talk on the discussion page about what I pretend to edit in those countries pages and I’m gonna talk to reach a consensus, there my concerns can be clarified, please I apologize. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 03:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I am too, but too confused, I applied in my edits what a user told me, but you took it as an edit war, and a user told me the opposite. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 03:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think they’re new. Their prose style, faux English as a second language, and their general approach remind me very much of an earlier troll. Just can’t place them. KJP1 (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I am not what these three comments are about, so I will start a new thought. TheEncyclopediaReader has amassed more than 3000 edits in just under a wee; many have been reverted and many of the rest probably could be. The edit war on Canada may have been innocent, but outing themself as an IP editor seems to explain how the editor became proficient. I do not think we are dealing with an entirely new editor. I am inferring that Moxy may also think we have a block evader. With no evidence, I will assume good faith and we just have a prolific new editor.
- As for the "policies" TheEncyclopediaReader, I assume we have an editor who is rule-based and may be referring to manuals of style, guidelines or even template documentation. Three reverts in under 24 hours does not violate WP:3RR, so I say no violation, but there is a bit of gaming going on and close to WP:NOTHERE behaviour. I am tempted to request lenience, particularly since it does not seem this editor is a native English speaker, but a short topic ban from geographic articles may be worthwhile. Either that or a WP:1RR on those topics, at least until TheEncyclopediaReader gains a bit more competency.
- I would, however, like to see who these editors who have supposedly been offering TheEncyclopediaReader advice are, and what advice they are offering. @TheEncyclopediaReader: can you please supply diffs or at least links to this advice? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- See the user's talk page for some of it. I will admit I was getting annoyed and frustrated with their ultimately rapid disruptive editing changing lists to single line with a hard coded circle bullet in between and altering long standing links to languages in official languages to be dialects when the "official" doesn't specify a dialect and general disruption around languages. Canterbury Tail talk 13:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz Of course I tell you the users that teached me, Canterbury Tail teached me the policies of MOS:PIPE and WP:EASTEREGG, and also he teached me that making this for example: Filipino • English can be confusing for others, the two lines are more common to use, and I said OK and as you can see I applied in a lot of articles, and you sirs you took it as a disruptive edition when nothing else was following a policy. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 14:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- See the user's talk page for some of it. I will admit I was getting annoyed and frustrated with their ultimately rapid disruptive editing changing lists to single line with a hard coded circle bullet in between and altering long standing links to languages in official languages to be dialects when the "official" doesn't specify a dialect and general disruption around languages. Canterbury Tail talk 13:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think they’re new. Their prose style, faux English as a second language, and their general approach remind me very much of an earlier troll. Just can’t place them. KJP1 (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
TheEncyclopediaReader is still engaging in edit-warring. [11] They are also clearly incapable of communicating properly in the English language: see here [12] where they start a thread with a confusing word-salad that nobody would be able to make head nor tail of without reading through their editing history. If we aren't being trolled here (which I'd have to suggest is a real possibility), we are dealing with someone simply lacking the necessary skill in English to be able to usefully contribute to the English-language Wikipedia. Competence is required. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Is not gibberish, I'm just saying what I intend to edit so as not to get into big trouble, but I also asked how he edited it and also told an anecdote, I hope you already understand. TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 19:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Further to my comments above, see this edit. [13] If that isn't trolling, it is a monumental display of incompetence. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
User:MrOllie reported by User:Weirdwiki64 (Result: Reporter blocked)
Page: Espresso (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Espresso machine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: MrOllie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [N/A, Sorry I have never done this and I am doing my best]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [N/A]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [16]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [17]
Comments:
I think this user is blocking other edits on these pages even when they welcome more information as some parts are especially light in context and resources like the roasts section of Espresso. (which is even mentioned in the talk page)
Weirdwiki64 (talk) 18:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is a linkspamming WP:SPA upset that they aren't being allowed to include their links. Suggest a WP:BOOMERANG. - MrOllie (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Weirdwiki64, Mr.Ollie Did not yet Violate WP:3RR There was only two edits to Espresso machine by Mr.Ollie. Most likely this report is malformed. Chip3004 (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
User:62.98.138.76 reported by User:Ghmyrtle (Result: Semi)
Page: John Lee Hooker discography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 62.98.138.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [18]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [28]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [29]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [30]
Comments:
User previously blocked for edit warring as IP 62.98.130.202 Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Result: Page semiprotected one month. This is a war about chart positions. The IP claims that a certain song reached #1 in the US but this can't be confirmed from any reliable source. EdJohnston (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Debresser and User:Dibol reported by User:DocWatson42 (Result: Declined – malformed report)
Page: The Blacklist (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users being reported: Debresser (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Dibol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Please pardon me. This is my first time doing this, and I am otherwise not directly involved—I only stumbled upon it while going to the article (The Blacklist (TV series)) to make some changes. This is what has apparently been going on in the last three days between the two editors in question (note the ad hominem bscenity):
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Blacklist_(TV_series)&action=history
I'm looking for a wiser, more knowledgeable, higher placed head to handle this, rather than potentially botching it on my own. I've just checked the talk pages of the article in question Debresser, and I do not find any discussion about this, though there is this history of a deleted comment on Dibol's talk page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dibol&diff=1083824617&oldid=1083810886
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dibol&diff=next&oldid=1083824617
I apologize if I am overstepping, or doing something else wrong.
I will place the notices on the talk pages of the editors in question immediately after I finish this comment. —DocWatson42 (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Or not, as I've realized that they should have been sent notices by my using their wikilinked usernames in the title of this section. Please correct me if I am mistaken. —DocWatson42 (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
User:2600:8800:2004:8100:48BB:73BD:784:F435/64 reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: Blocked 48 hours. )
Page: Black and white cookie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2600:8800:2004:8100:48BB:73BD:784:F435/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 14:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "/* In Popular Culture */Lmao I couldnt care less about what a literally who wants/prefers. This is the FREE encyclopedia. Meaning, free flow of information"
- 14:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "/* In Popular Culture */Clarified header to allow for the inclusion of more information. Yes I made my talk page post. Thank you"
- 14:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "/* In Popular Culture */This is what it is. Its all popular culture. So why not change it to popular culture so we can have more information than just three different quotes? Ive looked at the edit history and every time someone would put anything remotely interesting it would get erased. Just because this is ONLY allowed to be about racism. Free encyclopedia huh?"
- 13:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "/* In Popular Culture */Fixed header to welcome the inclusion of more information."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: Warning, 13:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Discussed here
Comments:
User:90.186.249.152 reported by User:PAVLOV (Result: blocked 72 hours )
Page: List of airlines of Brazil (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 90.186.249.152 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 15:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "because you are ignorant about theme, airline since long sold out"
- 15:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Undo without a reason"
- 14:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Baufaker"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 15:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 15:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "/* Prove it */ new section"
Comments:
This user engaged in edit wars in pages. List of airlines of Brazil and Antonov Airlines PAVLOV (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- I'll add 15:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Undo without a reason" onto the pile of this user's reverts. - ZLEA T\C 16:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked User has a history dating back several days, several warnings (since read and removed). It's time to take a break. --Jayron32 16:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- FWIW, based on behaviour (pages edited, edits made, talk-wiping behaviour, no edit summaries, hostile responses), I believe this is a continuation of the same editor at IP 188.96.90.68. signed, Willondon (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Dibol reported by User:PAVLOV (Result: Blocked for 6 months )
Page: The Blacklist (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dibol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 23:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC) "Fuck you @Debresser"
- 19:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1083792735 by Debresser (talk)"
- 23:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC) "Reverted bad faith editing. I did say temporary basis within the context of the episode he was promoted."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 16:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on The Blacklist (TV series)."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
@DocWatson42: refiled for you. PAVLOV (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked for 6 months. 9 prior blocks for edit warring, plus the compounding incivility and personal attacks, is sufficient. We've seen enough from this person for a while. --Jayron32 16:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
User:Toa Nidhiki05 reported by User:Earthh (Result: )
Page: Morbius (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 19:17, 21 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083950686 by Earthh (talk): This critic's single review is not indicative of anything, and we already have a reception section stacked with disproprotionate Leto praise. Please take this to the talk."
- 18:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "Restored revision 1083946133 by 196.4.56.11 (talk): Source is not derivative of RT and does not attribute its specific claims to RT."
- Consecutive edits made from 17:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC) to 03:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- 17:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC) "+Times of India +Yahoo News"
- 17:43, 21 April 2022 (UCT) "/* Critical response */"
- 17:48, 21 April 2022 (UCT)
- 17:52, 21 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083939609 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk): Reverting; my edit summary was not added for some reason?"
- 17:54, 21 April 2022 (UCT) "WP:BOLD changes per WP:RS and WP:LEDE. Removing praise of Leto from lede as we have conflicting sources on this. Removing direct citations, which are generally not put in ledes. Including specific details rather than citing to RT directly; we have multiple outlets to draw from here now."
- 23:24, 19 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083646967 by Toa Nidhiki05 (talk): Please take this to the talk, where discussion is ongoing"
- 23:13, 19 April 2022 (UCT) "No consensus, and new wording actually ERASES reliably sourced stuff"
- 03:06, 19 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083394828 by Indagate (talk): Not properly sourced"
- 12:40, 18 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083330002 by Endwise (talk): Reviews were not "generaly" negative, and Leto's performance was not broadly praised."
- 01:21, 17 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1083039710 by AbsolutelyFiring (talk): Inaccurate."
- 19:55, 15 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1082895033 by Erik (talk): Ongoing talk discussion"
- 14:30, 15 April 2022 (UCT) "Don’t lie about what sources say, Earthh. That second source doesn’t praise Leto."
- 17:04, 14 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1082704825 by AbsolutelyFiring (talk): Not supported by sources"
- 02:04, 14 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1082558229 by Evope (talk)"
- 18:12, 13 April 2022 (UCT) "You adding the Leto praise yourself and revert anyone who removes it, {{u|User:Earthh}}. There is no consensus for including this - please continue discussing on the talk page, where you can make your case far more successfully than through edit warring to include it."
- 17:11, 13 April 2022 (UCT) "Please take this to the talk. There's no consensus and the claim directly contradicts sources"
- 16:34, 12 April 2022 (UCT) "continue to object to singling out leto's performance for praise when an equal or greater number of reviews actively criticized it"
- 01:26, 8 April 2022 (UCT) "Restored revision 1081527406 by GoingBatty (talk): Please take this to the talk"
- 20:47, 7 April 2022 (UCT) "Leto's also received criticism, so I'm not sure mentioning it as praiseworthy is accurate"
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UCT) "Morbius: new section"
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments:
I have noticed disruptive changes to the lead section of Morbius (film), which started on 7 April 2022. A first attempt to discuss was attempted on the user's talk page, but there has been no willingness to engage there. I warned the user not to continue edit-warring but I was equally ignored as my post was removed from his talkpage (which I incorrectly restored having misinterpreted WP:BLANKING; later another user explained it to me). Erik and I then tried to discuss on the article talk page, but were met with hostility as well. The user is doing inappropriate, accusatory edit summaries [31][32][33]; he is reverting multiple users who object to his edits [34][35][36][37], removing a reliably sourced and neutral statement without any acceptable reason [38][39][40] and refusing to contribute constructively to the talk page discussion in order to try to resolve the issue [41][42]. I don't want to keep edit-warring with him but he specifically said he is not going to stop [43].--Earthh (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)