(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 196:
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> [[WP:PAID]] editor repeatedly inserting massive amount of unsourced, promotional cruft in the face of advice/warnings from myself, {{u|Mean as custard}}, {{u|David Biddulph}} and {{u|Cullen328}}. See [[special:diff/864284753|my edit summary for details]]. Incidentally, Twinkle wouldn't load the report for me (3X!), so apologies if this is more malformed than usual. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Serial Number 54129|Serial Number 54129]] ([[User talk:Serial Number 54129#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|contribs]]) </small>
*{{u|Krishendrix78}}, this is the final discussion before blocking you. When your edits have been challenged, and if you continuously attempt to reinstate your version, this is considered [[wp:disruptive|disruptive]]. Moving forward, and IMP: Do you agree to only add that material which you have first discussed on the talk page and and have gained [[wp:consensus|consensus]] for the same? [[User talk:❤️|<span style="color: black">Lourdes</span>]] 14:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
== [[User:AssociateAffiliate]] reported by [[User:Zackmann08]] (Result: Declined) ==
|
Revision as of 14:16, 17 October 2018
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
User:Simba383 reported by User:Ifnord (Result: EC protection)
- Page
- Aziz Ahmed (general) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Simba383 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 04:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Family background */"
- Consecutive edits made from 04:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC) to 04:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- 04:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Family background and controversy */"
- 04:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Family background */"
- 04:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Family background*/"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 04:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Aziz Ahmed (general). (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
- Result: Article is EC protected 3 months. There is a steady stream of new editors, some autoconfirmed, who appear to be either sock or meat puppets. Use the talk page to get agreement on whether information about the general's family belongs in his article. EdJohnston (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm surprised no one has done anything about the rather obvious socking here, so I have opened an SPI case. TheVicarsCat (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:2003:cd:3723:2450:c052:f02c:e88a:75cc reported by User:Igor Balashov (Result: No violation)
Page: 2018 WTA Finals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2003:cd:3723:2450:c052:f02c:e88a:75cc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Comments:
It was from two empty accounts, but clearly one person, may be considered as vandalism. Stephens is very likely to qualify, but formally she's not yet, no official report, slight chance that Svitolina will receive wild card and three players will overcome Stephens, wikipedia should not predict events even if very likely. Here is proof that not yet [2].--Igor Balashov (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- No violation – Nobody broke WP:3RR. As to the disputed matter about Sloane Stephens, it was recently confirmed that Stephens has qualified to play in Singapore so there is no further need to keep this assertion out of the article. EdJohnston (talk) 15:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Great job, next time when someone will add results of a football match two days before it happen - you should also act like this, to wait for a result and if it will turn out to be right, just do nothing and said there were no violations.--Igor Balashov (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:An actual biological woman reported by User:Jake Brockman (Result: Page protected)
- Page
- Daniel Küblböck (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- An actual biological woman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 14:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864167276 by Serols (talk)"
- 14:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864167067 by Serols (talk)"
- 14:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864166438 by Serols (talk) Being trans isn't about surgery. Educate yourself. Unlearn your transphobia."
- 14:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864164015 by Jake Brockman (talk) i think it's better to respect what it seems her identity was"
- 14:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864158910 by Jake Brockman (talk)"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 14:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Help Daniel Küblböck */ new section"
- 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "re"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Honestly, I'm done reinstating the info about Kublbock being a woman(which she was) for the time being. I get the verifiability thing. It seems really jobsworth-like to me, but I guess I get it. Also, there was no warning. nice try tho An actual biological woman (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Page protected. I completely understand what the reported editor is doing here; if there was clear reliable sourcing that the subject identified as female then they would be abolsutely correct. However, that sourcing isn't there at the moment; as User:Jake Brockman pointed out, there's hearsay. This is something that needs to be hashed out on the talkpage - either there is reliable information, or there isn't. A note to User:Serols - gender identity is completely irrelevant to surgery - see WP:GENDERID. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Black Kite: thanks for this. However, are we keeping the protected article with the undersourced female personality and not the base version until there may be further conversation? Thanks. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 15:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, The Wrong Version Problem. I suggest that if no relaible sources can be found within 24h that xe identified as female, if someone lets me know, I will revert it to the stable version. Black Kite (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry Black Kite, I didn't see this discussion before reverting to the stable version. Feel free to revert me. Regards SoWhy 17:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, The Wrong Version Problem. I suggest that if no relaible sources can be found within 24h that xe identified as female, if someone lets me know, I will revert it to the stable version. Black Kite (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Black Kite: thanks for this. However, are we keeping the protected article with the undersourced female personality and not the base version until there may be further conversation? Thanks. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 15:31, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
User:John Dick 78 reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Indef)
- Page
- Greece (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- John Dick 78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 00:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "You think that Kastellorizo is in Europe???"
- 00:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "You think that Symi is in Europe??"
- 23:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "You think that Samos is in Europe?"
- 21:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC) "So, you think Lesbos is in Europe?"
- 19:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC) "Some of its islands are much closer to Asia than Europe."
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Just returned at Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to repeat the same CIR edit-warring for which he got blocked in March and April 2018. Dr. K. 00:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- User:John Dick 78's purpose on Wikipedia seems to be edit warring about the status of certain Greek islands. He declares these islands to be in Asia not Europe. After six months and two prior blocks he seems unlikely to change. I propose an indefinite block. (Anybody who looks at a map will see the Greek islands stretching most of the way to Turkey. Someone needs to make an arbitrary decision whether these islands are in Europe or Asia. A new editor who arrives with a personal mission to change that assignment is not exactly helpful). EdJohnston (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. This account seems fixated on this particular edit and has waged epic edit-wars to enforce it. To gain a perspective on the magnitude of disruption this has caused, please see the 31 March 2018 report featuring 8 reverts and the 2 April 2018 report featuring 5 reverts. Including today's report, this single edit has been enforced by edit-warring a total of 18 times. Dr. K. 01:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely Lourdes 07:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Fieryflames reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: Indeffed, pending copyvio acknowledgement)
Page: Paul Abrahamian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Fieryflames (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 04:25, 10 October 2018 - Paul Abrahamian
- 01:24, 16 October 2018 - Paul Abrahamian
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]
Comments:
First off apologies in advance if this report is messed up - Twinkle isn't working so had to do this manually,
This editor is slowly edit warring at Paul Abrahamian, Burt Reynolds and at Danielle Bregoli inserting copyvio images, I've twice asked them to pack it in[3][4] but they've simply continued,
Like I said it's a slow edit war however either way this editor doesn't seem to want to cooperate despite myself giving them a chance to do just that,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- I hadn't realised but over at Burt Reynolds they'd gone well over 3 reverts and the article ended up protected so really this report should be for that page but like I said they've pretty much slowly-edit warred on all 3 pages give or take, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 02:06, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked indefinitely The editor had been warned earlier of copyvio infringements. Once they acknowledge that they recognize their mistake, they may be immediately unblocked. Lourdes 06:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:LandRussia reported by User:Dorsetonian (Result:Blocked 24 hours )
- Page
- United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- LandRussia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 09:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864285545 by Ghmyrtle (talk) where is your consensus? Only cancel last change and think that it's ok. It's not ok"
- 08:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864284254 by Ghmyrtle (talk) census is not. But all information about population giving at 2017. Either it's estimate or something else, doesn't mater if it's working here a lot of time"
- 08:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864283409 by PaleCloudedWhite (talk) What? "plus the key had Russian text" so what? Are you rasist? Where wrote that all maps should key name on english?"
- 08:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864282622 by Dorsetonian (talk) go to discussion"
- 08:10, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864278547 by Roger 8 Roger (talk) take YOU talk, if you want. On this link this art using twice, it's awesome! My art is actual, there is nothing to talk about"
- 07:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864226472 by IdreamofJeanie (talk) return the actual version. Version from 2011 using twice on the link"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 08:32, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on United Kingdom . (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
User is also edit warring in the same way on Demographics of Poland, though hasn't exceeded three reverts there yet.
Conversation is not correct. Please, show the all history of change. Where is the history like "Remove meaningless chart" and like"just it incorrect" . I was getting only messages like that. If i wasn't getting something else, what i should do? I ust return change, because the arguments are not convincingLandRussia (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- LandRussia, you added a map of the "UK as of 2017". There was no 2017 census. Admins, note that they continued to revert even after they were reported here. Vermont (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Mattximus reported by User:Dilidor (Result: )
Page: List of municipalities in Rhode Island (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mattximus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island&oldid=863693415
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island&type=revision&diff=863300286&oldid=863217433
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island&type=revision&diff=863471269&oldid=863392092
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island&type=revision&diff=863690694&oldid=863688052
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island&type=revision&diff=864222022&oldid=863693415
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_municipalities_in_Rhode_Island#Report_of_Edit_Warring
Comments:
Mattximus and I were warned to cease editing until consensus had been reached. We continued discussion on Talk but did not reach consensus—so Mattximus simply reverted and claimed that we had. —Dilidor (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- I have left a warning to Mattximus to self-revert to avoid a block, but they have not edited Wikipedia since that warning was given. The prior edit warring complaint can be seen here. I think we should wait to see if Mattximus will respond before taking action on a block. EdJohnston (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Krishendrix78 reported by User:Serial Number 54129 (Result: )
Page: Royal Air Force Museum London (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Krishendrix78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [6]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 18:46, 16 October 2018 (have merged the sections of description and aircraft on display. I hope this is better?)
- 18:19, 16 October 2018 (Two sections which were there before - and had been there for several years - were removed, which does not seem to make sense as other aviation museums do have lists of aircraft on display: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Military_aviation_museums_in_England)
- 18:57, 15 October 2018 (I have added independent references to the article, which back up all information in this article)
- 15:52, 15 October 2018 (Undid revision 864151123 by Mean as custard Hello, I am reverting this, because last time I did remove the promotional aspect. If you still feel it is incorrect or biased, please let me know which parts and I will gladly change them.)
- 11:10, 15 October 2018 (Undid revision 864137257 by Mean as custard (talk) I have reverted this edit and I will tone down any soapboxing. However, make sure you communicate about which parts you are unhappy. Dismissing and deleting my hard day's work is not really constructive !)
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]
Comments: WP:PAID editor repeatedly inserting massive amount of unsourced, promotional cruft in the face of advice/warnings from myself, Mean as custard, David Biddulph and Cullen328. See my edit summary for details. Incidentally, Twinkle wouldn't load the report for me (3X!), so apologies if this is more malformed than usual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serial Number 54129 (talk • contribs)
- Krishendrix78, this is the final discussion before blocking you. When your edits have been challenged, and if you continuously attempt to reinstate your version, this is considered disruptive. Moving forward, and IMP: Do you agree to only add that material which you have first discussed on the talk page and and have gained consensus for the same? Lourdes 14:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
User:AssociateAffiliate reported by User:Zackmann08 (Result: Declined)
- Page
- James Jones (cricketer, born 1870) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- AssociateAffiliate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 21:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "AssociateAffiliate moved page James Jones (cricketer, born 1878) to James Jones (cricketer, born 1870) over redirect: Perhaps you ought to check this... http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/30/30663/30663.html"
- 21:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 864381346 by Zackmann08 (talk) Yeah coz I pulled those dates out my arse, you know."
- 20:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC) ""
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
User has reverted multiple edits despite the fact that their edits broke the template and directly contradict the source on the page. The user did provide a link that supposedly supports their claim but it links to a page that requires paid access. When attempting to discuss the issue, user immediately resorted to accusing me of being on a power trip. I'm removing myself from any further edits to the page in question but would like an admin to look into this. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Lol. The fearful admin police. How do I plead your honour? Guilty! StickyWicket (talk) 21:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- This is being discussed here. Hopefully this is now resolved. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Declined, and discussions, as mentioned by Lugnuts, are continuing. Lourdes 14:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)