MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 7 thread(s) (older than 72h) to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive75. |
→User:Ronz reported by User:Levine2112 (Result: Discussed ): thanks - big mistake on my part in trying to deal with a difficult editor |
||
Line 497: | Line 497: | ||
:I'm not going to block for this. I'll make a suggestion anyway. This is just silly behaviour from both editors. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 04:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC) |
:I'm not going to block for this. I'll make a suggestion anyway. This is just silly behaviour from both editors. [[User:Scarian|<font color="black" face="tahoma">Scarian</font>]][[User_talk:Scarian|<font color="red"><sup>Call me Pat!</sup></font>]] 04:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks for the consideration. I apologize for using the revert action as a way to continue my discussion with Levine2112. I will not do so again. In the future I will summarize my previous statements as needed. Thanks again. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 17:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:MargBarBahaim]] reported by [[User:Jeff3000]] (Result: Already blocked ) == |
== [[User:MargBarBahaim]] reported by [[User:Jeff3000]] (Result: Already blocked ) == |
Revision as of 17:16, 5 July 2008
Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard |
---|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Violations
- Please place new reports at the BOTTOM. If you do not see your report, you can search the archives for it.
User:Jonathanmills reported by User:Historičar (Result: Stale)
- Three-revert rule violation on Srebrenica massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jonathanmills (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 06:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 23:35, 30 June 2008
- 1st revert: 14:31, 1 July 2008 using his IP 83.244.153.172 (talk · contribs)
- 2nd revert: 14:44, 1 July 2008 using his IP 83.244.153.172 (talk · contribs)
- 3rd revert: 15:36, 1 July 2008 using his IP 83.244.153.207 (talk · contribs)
- 4th revert: 15:41, 1 July 2008 using his IP 83.244.153.207 (talk · contribs)
- 5th revert: 15:47, 1 July 2008
- 6th revert: 15:52, 1 July 2008
- 7th revert: 15:55, 1 July 2008
- 8th revert: 16:07, 1 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning -1st time: 15:58, 1 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning -2nd time: 16:00, 1 July 2008
Note
Regarding IP addresses used by Jonathanmills, I would like to say that he admits those addresses were his. Take a look here: Talk:Srebrenica_massacre#my_stance. There you can see his insults as well, for example he said: I have no interest in pushing shit uphill against a bunch of dickheads with no interest in the facts...However,if any dickhead re-inserts the word 'panicking' about that Bosniak soldier, expect it to be deleted at some point.
He is acting as he is the owner of Wikipedia. What does it mean: expect it to be deleted?! I am shocked. He also insults other users in edit summary: [1]: like this YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKWIT, MATE. i don't mind putting the tag further down, but LOOK UP THE FACTS ON 'PANICKING'!!!!!
I think he should be blocked for a longer period. Historičar (talk) 06:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Stale This was yesterday and the edit war has died down since. 3RR blocks are intended to be preventative and not punitive. Both users warned of the arbitration remedies. Stifle (talk) 09:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:De Broglie hypothesis (Result: Warned)
- Continuous editwarring over User:86.83.155.44's artificial signature by User:Erik Baas. AFAIK, extra wikilinks in sigs is not a good idea, but editwarring over it doesn't look like the correct response; anon simply seems to be testing. Guido den Broeder (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Warned--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Users are continuing their editwar despite warnings issued. Regards, Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Savvy10 reported by User:Aspects (Result: 24 hours)
- Three-revert rule violation on American Idol (season 7) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Savvy10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 19:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 21:44 30 June, 2007
- 1st revert: 21:58 1 July, 2008
- 2nd revert: 00:31 2 July, 2008
- 3rd revert: 1:57 2 July, 2008
- 4th revert: 15:17 2 July, 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 2:36 2 July, 2008
Aspects (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Ancientworld reported by User:Laveol (Result: 24h )
- Three-revert rule violation on Bitola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ancientworld (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 19:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 13:19, 27 June 2008
- 1st revert: 00:19, 2 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 13:59, 2 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 16:06, 2 July 2008
- 4th revert: 17:17, 2 July 2008
- 5th revert: 17:27, 2 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 16:10, 2 July 2008
- Additionally the user has most probably created a sockpuppet History753 (talk · contribs) to enable him to edit-war on Heraclea Lyncestis --Laveol T 19:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Furthermore, 77.28.161.245 (talk · contribs) blocked for 24 hours. GDonato (talk) 21:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Maracana reported by User:Martintg (Result:24h)
- Three-revert rule violation on Jaak Aaviksoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Maracana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 20:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 17:54, 29 May 2008
- 1st revert: 11:44, 30 June 2008
- 2nd revert: 13:20, 30 June 2008
- 3rd revert: 07:41, 1 July 2008
- 4th revert: 17:21, 1 July 2008
- 5th revert: 21:04, 1 July 2008
- 6th revert: 11:58, 2 July 2008
- 7th revert: 14:12, 2 July 2008
- 8th revert: 14:44, 2 July 2008
- 9th revert: 17:54, 2 July 2008
- 10th revert: 20:53, 2 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 04:48, 2 July 2008
Editor keeps reverting info box data, not accepting the compromise offered on the talk, and despite being aware of the ANI report Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Contentious_infobox_edits_by_User:Maracana and the community's view that he should be more courteous towards other people and consider their opinions rather than simply changing stuff; and also warned by an admin on his talk page to obtain concensus first before changing or be blocked. Just made a 10th revert, Maracana seems to be thumbing his nose at the community and the need to get concensus on talk. Martintg (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Certainly a violation (reverts 6-10 being within 24 hours for 3RR). I am also suspicious of 90.190.59.117 (talk · contribs) and whether there is any relationship with Vecrumba (talk · contribs) (Vecrumba having made 3 reversions) but I could not find any evidence I would encourage editors to seek a compromise and have the article on watch, willing to protect it if disputes continue, GDonato (talk) 22:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
User:80.5.143.72 reported by User:Kariteh (Result: 48 hours)
- Three-revert rule violation on Raccoon City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 80.5.143.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 22:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 13:05, 1 July 2008
- 1st revert: 21:32, 1 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 16:10, 2 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 21:37, 2 July 2008
- 4th revert: 23:20, 2 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 19:26, 28 June 2008
User:81.157.83.142 reported by User:Kariteh (Result: 48 hours )
- Three-revert rule violation on Raccoon City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 81.157.83.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 22:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 17:05, 29 June 2008 (a bot added a few dates in maintenance tags inbetween [2])
- 1st revert: 17:13, 1 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 23:41, 1 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 16:13, 2 July 2008
- 4th revert: 23:02, 2 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 00:08, 2 July 2008
User:162.83.201.159 reported by User:Tomas_e (Result:24h )
- Three-revert rule violation on Commandaria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 162.83.201.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 22:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 03:56, 23 June 2008 or 21:33, 2 July 2008
Mixed approach of reverts and reentry of text. Basic dispute with several other editors concerns the unsourced addition of "Along with Mavrodaphne, it is used as Altar wine in the Orthodox Church". The two versions mentioned above differ only by a "source needded" tag, but have the same substance.
- 1st revert: 16:05, 2 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 17:14, 2 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 21:25, 2 July 2008
- 4th revert: 21:28, 2 July 2008
- 5th revert: 21:33, 2 July 2008
- 6th revert: 21:38, 2 July 2008
- 7th revert: 21:46, 2 July 2008
Was given "the benefit of doubt" by going through uw-unsourced1 to uw-unsourced3 before uw-rr3 was applied.
- Diff of 3RR warning: 21:43, 2 July 2008
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Fairly obvious violation, GDonato (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
User:82.19.41.23 reported by User:Btharper1221 (Result: Semi-protected
- Three-revert rule violation on Kirstie Allsopp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 82.19.41.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 22:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 17:06, July 2, 2008
- 1st revert: 13:59, July 2, 2008
- 2nd revert: 14:11, July 2
- 3rd revert: 16:59, July 2
- 4th revert: 20:14, July 2
- Diff of 3RR warning: 17:09, July 2, 2008
User also has similar edits to the Phil Spencer article, containing the same comment. The user was provided with additional warnings concerning his "Note to the moderators", he has been told numerous times to provide something verifiable. The user has been blocked three times previous to this for vandalism and disruptive edits which may also apply in this case. Thank you Ben (talk) 22:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Page has been semi-protected by User:Scarian. Stifle (talk) 08:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Arjuna316 reported by User:terrifictriffid (Result: 8 hours)
- Three-revert rule violation on Dalit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Arjuna316 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 08:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: [3]
User:Publiusohio reported by User:Ave Caesar (Result: No action)
- Three-revert rule violation on John Birch Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Publiusohio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 12:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 02:10, 2 July 2008
- 1st revert: 02:47, 2 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 05:32, 2 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 14:28, 2 July 2008
- 4th revert: 19:33, 2 July 2008
- 5th revert: 22:56, 2 July 2008
- User has been blocked for violating this rule several times before.
- Declined The edit war has ceased and as 3RR blocks are preventative and not punitive, there is nothing really to do here. Stifle (talk) 12:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
User:DuckerM reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: 24 hours)
- Three-revert rule violation on American Jews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DuckerM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 21:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 19:01, June 30, 2008
- 1st revert: 03:31, July 2, 2008
- 2nd revert: 11:47, July 2, 2008
- 3rd revert: 17:57, July 2, 2008
- 4th revert: 04:14, July 3, 2008
- 5th revert: 15:37, July 3, 2008
- 6th revert: 23:57, July 3, 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 15:50, July 2, 2008
- Comment: Technically this is not 3 reverts within 24 hours, but it is clearly gaming the system. In addition, "the rule does not convey an entitlement to revert three times each day". — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 21:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked the single purpose account for 24 hours for disruptive editing/edit warring. seicer | talk | contribs 04:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Continuous editwarring over User:86.83.155.44's artificial signature by User:Erik Baas. Continued despite warnings (see above). Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by 'declined', since I didn't ask for anything. This page's header reads: Please feel free to leave a message or report a violation. I did the former. Regards, Guido den Broeder (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Taulant23 reported by User:Gkmx (Result: Dealt with by way of arbitration remedy)
- Three-revert rule violation on Albania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Taulant23 (talk · contribs)
Time reported: Gkmx (talk) 02:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 01:03, 4 July 2008
- 1st revert: 23:29, 3 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 05:35, 3 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 17:55, 1 July 2008
- 4th revert: 06:13, 27 June 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 02:39, 4 July 2008
- Comment. The user is just short of the time frame of 24 hrs. However, it has clearly been an ongoing problem. Whenever other users restore the original version of the item in question, the user Taulant23 reverts them within several hours. The intent of the 3RR is to limit edit warring and the item in question is becoming subject of an edit war due to the actions of Taulant23 on one side and several users on the other side.
- Gkmx (talk) 02:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia policies won't work in an uncollaborative environment. Your editing here is doomed to fail.It is easy in the "heat of the moment" to forget violations in the face of warnings to cease such activity.Your presence here does nothing but create severe irritation, edit wars, and lots of wasted time. I and other users have provided you with plenty arguments and still you are reverting(more than 5 times).I do not wish to loose any time explained to you what your actions do translate in here but one is for sure WP:POINT.These kinds of "Balkan mentality" debates are always so silly and take so long.I would advise that we can come to a consensus before you edit or revert again. [10].Please change your attitude.Thank you.--Taulant23 (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- "Just short of the time frame"? It's well out of time. However, I think I will be giving out some {{uw-balkans}}. Stifle (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:208.104.238.191 reported by User:loodog (Result: 3 hours)
- Three-revert rule violation on Charlotte, North Carolina. 208.104.238.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 04:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 10:42, 3 July 2008.
Flagrant edit warring, of which user has a long history. On multiple pages.
- 1st revert: 02:12, 4 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 02:31, 4 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 02:46, 4 July 2008
- 4th revert: 02:55, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 02:47, 4 July 2008
Blocked – for a period of 3 hours Stifle (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:208.104.238.191 reported by User:JuJube (Result: Already blocked)
- Three-revert rule violation on Charlotte, North Carolina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 208.104.238.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 04:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 02:08, 4 July 2008
- 1st revert: 02:10, 4 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 02:31, 4 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 02:46, 4 July 2008
- 4th revert: 02:55, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 02:49, 4 July 2008
Taekwondo edit war- and expansion
Originaly posted on the main admin notice board as not a simple 3RR issue hence not using the template, but due to the lack of responses posted here: The Taekwondo talk page gives a good introduction. Started (several months ago) as an edit war after JJL (talk · contribs) substantial rewrote the article with a strong Pro-karate/Japanese POV. Several editors felt he went to far beyond what the sources supported, it went to a mediation which stalled. After this failure JJL and Manacpowers (talk · contribs) engaged in and edit war over a Japanese vs Korean POV, I and some other editors attempted to produce a neutral version and reason with both sides, this was hampered by stubbornness on both sides, policy misunderstandings and Manacpowers poor level of English. Except from brief flare-ups on the reliable sources notice board, and the martial arts project talk pages it has generally keept it self to the Taekwondo and talk pages. I have brought this here Manacpowers has now started editing various Korean martial arts articles in attempt to prove a point that only majority view (in his opinion that Taekwondo is primarily korean) should be shown. I noticed this on the Hapkido article where he as claimed the it might actually have originated 3000 years ago with Bodhidharma (see Asian martial arts (origins), the edit war & POV forks there for how debatable that is) referencing a Korean edition of Britannica, which I tried to translate using babel fish & can't make out anything useful from.
I asked him to read WP:Point, and he then copy an pasted a previous comment of mine about showing all sourced views. showing his previous patten of finding a point policy to stand on and reiterating it regardless of relevance, counter points, misunderstandings of what he has read or contradiction. I realise that I have become embroiled in this and am struggling remain neutral due to my increasing frustration with Manacpowers, and to a lesser extent with JJL. I have asked on several project talk pages for other editors to help but as none have come forward I am left with myself an a couple of other well intentioned editors to try and resolve the dispute. Manacpowers escalation to other articles has lead me to believe that he will not debate but will keep arguing the point and disrupting articles, while a block may not yet be in order some stern words (ideally in Korean) are needed to prevent him from spoiling several articles that have been progressing well and introducing errors (factual and grammatical) that my not be fixed for an extended period. --Nate1481(t/c) 12:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Stifle (talk) 13:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please read the top line, it is not a simple 3RR case, but no one responded on the main notice board.
- This is a bad-faith report unrelated to 3RR for the reporter to get attention from administrators. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Besides, why did you strike the above comment of Stifle?[11] That is no good.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- I struck it out because I had explicitly said in the first line of my comment Why I had not used the template. The report is not in bad faith, but is an attempt to get the attention of someone to stop an edit war, and when I checked this is the notice board you are directed to for edit wars. --Nate1481(t/c) 14:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? This board is not for complaints on content disputes or users' behaviors. You're a long-time editor, so you know well about what function the noticeboard does. In light of these, this misfit report is in bad faith in my eyes even I understand your frustration, and you remained clam until yesterday. The last comment is I think personal attacks. The last three times I visited were others' 3RR violations reported by me, not mine.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- I struck it out because I had explicitly said in the first line of my comment Why I had not used the template. The report is not in bad faith, but is an attempt to get the attention of someone to stop an edit war, and when I checked this is the notice board you are directed to for edit wars. --Nate1481(t/c) 14:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Besides, why did you strike the above comment of Stifle?[11] That is no good.--Caspian blue (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- This is a bad-faith report unrelated to 3RR for the reporter to get attention from administrators. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please read the top line, it is not a simple 3RR case, but no one responded on the main notice board.
- Yes it says at the top: EDIT WARS, which this is. Try reading the comments not assuming. --Nate1481(t/c) 14:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Regardless, this report is unrelated to the 3RR board. Why are you behaving so differently at this time from your usual attitudes?--Caspian blue (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it says at the top: EDIT WARS, which this is. Try reading the comments not assuming. --Nate1481(t/c) 14:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- As I said - this is the 3RR noticeboard. If a violation of the 3RR has occurred, or there is serious edit warring which you believe warrants a block, please show diffs. Otherwise, please stop arguing here. Stifle (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Folantin reported by User:Kuban kazak (Result: 2x 12 hour blocks)
- Three-revert rule violation on Chechen people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Folantin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 15:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 13:29, 25 June 2008
- 1st revert: 15:22, 3 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 08:09, 4 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 14:28, 4 July 2008
- 4th revert: 15:06, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 09:04, 4 July 2008
- Both reporter and reportee blocked for 12 hours for edit warring. ScarianCall me Pat! 16:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:71.212.14.210 reported by User:Visionholder (Result: Blocked for 24 hours )
- Three-revert rule violation on Tamarind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 71.212.14.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 19:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 14:23, 1 July 2008
- 1st revert: 10:14, 30 June 2008
- 2nd revert: 12:46, 30 June 2008
- 3rd revert: 16:23, 30 June 2008
- 4th revert: 11:29, 1 July 2008
- 5th revert: 10:49, 2 July 2008
- 6th revert: 22:39, 2 July 2008
- 7th revert: 04:32, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 22:39, 2 July 2008
- Single-purpose editing, edit-warring at Tamarind, and then resorting to blanking the page. Blocked for 24 hours. --Elonka 22:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Muntuwandi reported by User:PelleSmith (Result: Blocked for one month )
- Three-revert rule violation on Origin of religion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Muntuwandi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 20:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 14:54, 4 July 2008
- 1st revert: 15:51, 4 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 16:12, 4 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 17:02, 4 July 2008
- 4th revert: 19:15, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: last block for same thing and I gave him a general warning days ago.
The Diff to the "warning" is actually a diff to his block log and the more general warning I gave him when he reappeared at the entry some days ago. His last 2 week block was for this exact same reason - editing warring on Origin of religion. He's more than well aware of 3RR and has been warned too many times about the very thing he's decided to start up once again.PelleSmith (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Blocked for one month, since this has been an ongoing problem at this article, and the last block was for two weeks. --Elonka 21:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Ronz reported by User:Levine2112 (Result: Discussed )
- Three-revert rule violation on User_talk:Levine2112. Ronz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 23:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 23:05, 4 July 2008
- 1st revert: 19:27, 4 July 2008
- 2nd revert: 19:54, 4 July 2008
- 3rd revert: 19:59, 4 July 2008
- 4th revert: 21:39, 4 July 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 8:01, 2 July 2008
- I'm not going to block for this. I'll make a suggestion anyway. This is just silly behaviour from both editors. ScarianCall me Pat! 04:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
User:MargBarBahaim reported by User:Jeff3000 (Result: Already blocked )
- Three-revert rule violation on Subh-i-Azal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). MargBarBahaim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Time reported: 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Previous version reverted to: 07:00, June 28, 2008
- 1st revert: 02:48, July 5, 2008
- 2nd revert: 03:23, July 5, 2008
- 3rd revert: 03:41, July 4, 2008
- 4th revert: 03:45, July 4, 2008
- Diff of 3RR warning: 03:43, July 4, 2008
This user is a sockpuppet of User:Thamarih, who was indefinitely blocked after many many blocks for personal attacks, and which has spurned a list of sockpuppets including User:SecretChiefs3, User:Thamareh, User: TheAuthenticSkeptic, User: YaAli110, User:Ahwa85, User: Mistsister303 (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Thamarih for more information). -- Jeff3000 (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Already blocked for being a sock! ScarianCall me Pat! 04:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Example
== [[User:<!--Place Name of 3RR "violator" here-->]] reported by [[User:<!-- Your NAME -->]] (Result: ) == *[[WP:3RR|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|<!-- Place name of Article here -->}}. {{3RRV|<!--Place Name of 3RR "violator" here-->}} Time reported: ~~~~~ *Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VERSIONTIME] <!-- This is MANDATORY. --> <!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to. The previous version reverted to must be a version from an earlier time than either of the two versions being compared in a diff. --> <!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. --> *1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME] *2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME] *3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME] *4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME] *Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME] <!-- COPY FROM ABOVE THIS LINE -->
See also
- Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest diff guide
- 3RR report helper tool – helps simplify diff gathering and reporting. Be sure to remove non-reverts from the report or it may be rejected.