Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 06:37 on 30 May 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Alerts
Bot-reported
- 70.163.220.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Seems to be removing refspam in the See Also section. SpencerT•C 00:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 160.103.2.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) User deleted most of article including references. The user's edit was tagged by a bot, and within minutes another bot reverted the edit citing "possible vandalism". Frei Hans (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Verbal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User kept deleting large blocks of content from an article and reverting content to those deleted versions. User was doing that at the same time as posting "edit war" messages on another user's page and near the same time as an anonymous user with the IP 160.103.2.223 deleted a lot of content. A bot tagged the anonymous edit for "possible vandalism". User campaigned for the same article's deletion. After being vandalised, the article was deleted and its history of vandalism deleted with it. Frei Hans (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Question: What deleted article are you referring to? On a brief look at recent contribs (including deleted ones), I can't find any vandalism committed by this user. ~ mazca talk 13:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- On further investigation this seems to be a week-old content dispute on Telepathy and war. This is not the correct venue to deal with this; I would suggest WP:DRV if you have issues with how that AfD occurred. ~ mazca talk 13:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Question: What deleted article are you referring to? On a brief look at recent contribs (including deleted ones), I can't find any vandalism committed by this user. ~ mazca talk 13:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- After having had more time to find out about Wikipedia, I feel this is the right venue. The user made deliberately disruptive edits. At the time the user's discussion page also had a message stating they had been blocked about a week earlier for similar behaviour on another article [1]. At first I wanted to take their edits in good faith but the user kept deleting content and pushing for the entire article's deletion while other users were trying to work on the article. Frei Hans (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- 86.96.229.84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On Leelkase;. Plenty of warnings.. Gordonrox24 | Talk 13:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- That is 12 warnings and not even a one day block! This IP shows no intent of being constructive.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 13:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)