→Template:Infobox ABU country: Comment |
|||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
:No. Not least as you've opened that discussion after this nomination. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 08:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
:No. Not least as you've opened that discussion after this nomination. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 08:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
::FYI {{U|Pigsonthewing}}, if you had done a bit more research, which you have demonstrated that you like to be devious and trawl through people's contributions as if to spite their nose of their face, then you would have discovered that the discussion has been ongoing for 2 weeks now at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Haphazard methods]], in which it has been noted that the project is in dire need of restructuring including the way it deals with categorisation and template structure. And there was no need to close down an active discussion on the project talk page that was concerning restructuring either; as the thread was covering not just templates, but other areas. All I have asked is for the project to be given the chance to discuss the issues and look into proposals of making universal infoboxes that would work on any contest article, and then we would be able to come back here with a list of obsolete templates that would be ready for uncontroversial speedy deletion, as the "snowball delete" consensus would have already been obtained as part of the project's restructuring debate. One would expect an ounce of courtesy, compassion, and allow a project the chance to sort out their mess. But then it is Christmas, and Scrooge has to live on! <span style="font-family:Corbel;text-shadow:#F70 2px 4px 6px;">'''[[User:Wesley Mouse|<span style="color:#1034A6">Wes Mouse</span>]] | <sup>[[User talk:Wesley Mouse|<span style="color:#AA0114">T@lk</span>]]'''</sup></span> 12:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
::FYI {{U|Pigsonthewing}}, if you had done a bit more research, which you have demonstrated that you like to be devious and trawl through people's contributions as if to spite their nose of their face, then you would have discovered that the discussion has been ongoing for 2 weeks now at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Haphazard methods]], in which it has been noted that the project is in dire need of restructuring including the way it deals with categorisation and template structure. And there was no need to close down an active discussion on the project talk page that was concerning restructuring either; as the thread was covering not just templates, but other areas. All I have asked is for the project to be given the chance to discuss the issues and look into proposals of making universal infoboxes that would work on any contest article, and then we would be able to come back here with a list of obsolete templates that would be ready for uncontroversial speedy deletion, as the "snowball delete" consensus would have already been obtained as part of the project's restructuring debate. One would expect an ounce of courtesy, compassion, and allow a project the chance to sort out their mess. But then it is Christmas, and Scrooge has to live on! <span style="font-family:Corbel;text-shadow:#F70 2px 4px 6px;">'''[[User:Wesley Mouse|<span style="color:#1034A6">Wes Mouse</span>]] | <sup>[[User talk:Wesley Mouse|<span style="color:#AA0114">T@lk</span>]]'''</sup></span> 12:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep, until a replacement template is ready''' – The ABU has no direct connection with the Eurovision Song Contest so just using the Eurovision template for ABU articles isn't a good idea in my opinion. I think creating a new template such as {{tlx|Infobox Song Contest}}, with flexible parameters to suit each contest as needed would work nicely. When this is done a new TfD can be opened and the old templates can be deleted as redundant. [[WP:EURO|WikiProject Eurovision]] are capable of doing the full implementation, and merges of templates and other such things had already been proposed before this nomination was made. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]]</small> 15:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
=====[[Template:Infobox Cân i Gymru National Year]] ===== |
=====[[Template:Infobox Cân i Gymru National Year]] ===== |
Revision as of 15:06, 7 December 2014
December 6
Template:Infobox SBTVD standard
- Template:Infobox SBTVD standard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Used for just eight articles on Brazilian digital television standards. Redundant to {{Infobox computing standard}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Merge to something: Is there a separate infobox for digital TV? Seems that computing standard is perhaps a little broad, but I don't know enough about the tech to speak to this. I definitely agree that one nation's digital TV standards with so few transclusions is a proper candidate for deletion and merge, but is the "computing standards" infobox the right target for a merge? Montanabw(talk) 01:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- keep, not entirely redundant to anything. we could always go back to the old version since we all love direct transclusions of {{infobox}}. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox W3C standard
- Template:Infobox W3C standard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Redundant to {{Infobox computing standard}}, which has the advantage of having an |organization=
parameter. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox perpetual motion machine
- Template:Infobox perpetual motion machine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox controversial invention (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox perpetual motion machine with Template:Infobox controversial invention.
Similar templates, with overlapping purpose, and only six transclusions between them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Song content temapltes
Template:Infobox ABU country
- Template:Infobox ABU country (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox Eurovision country (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox ABU country with Template:Infobox Eurovision country.
Identical apart from a couple of parameter names. An apparent fork, with an uncredited copy of the underlying code. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- A pattern emerging here. I think a RfC is in order if we are going to be looking at the redesign of such infoboxes, and then we (or Andy) could then mass-delete the ones that are no longer needed. TfD of multiple templates all scattered about at different sections of this TfD page is just going to cause a lot of problems. People would mention of suggestion at one TfD and not be aware of other suggestions at one of the other TfD's. Could we not put all these "noms" together in the same thread, to avoid confusion. Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support deletion and merge: No need for 10 katrillion infoboxes for every nuance. One will do. Montanabw(talk) 01:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Against merging: I see no reason for merging. Wesley makes several good points as to why it should not be merged as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Restructuring, which was in the project's pipeline to begin with, regarding proposals to create "all-in-one" universal infoboxes for contests/festivals within Project Eurovision scope, so that they can be used on any of their respective articles regardless of the type of contest. Request to postpone TfD so that the discussions can conclude and may result in other templates within the project to be deleted en-mass. Wes Mouse | T@lk 01:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. Not least as you've opened that discussion after this nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- FYI Pigsonthewing, if you had done a bit more research, which you have demonstrated that you like to be devious and trawl through people's contributions as if to spite their nose of their face, then you would have discovered that the discussion has been ongoing for 2 weeks now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Haphazard methods, in which it has been noted that the project is in dire need of restructuring including the way it deals with categorisation and template structure. And there was no need to close down an active discussion on the project talk page that was concerning restructuring either; as the thread was covering not just templates, but other areas. All I have asked is for the project to be given the chance to discuss the issues and look into proposals of making universal infoboxes that would work on any contest article, and then we would be able to come back here with a list of obsolete templates that would be ready for uncontroversial speedy deletion, as the "snowball delete" consensus would have already been obtained as part of the project's restructuring debate. One would expect an ounce of courtesy, compassion, and allow a project the chance to sort out their mess. But then it is Christmas, and Scrooge has to live on! Wes Mouse | T@lk 12:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, until a replacement template is ready – The ABU has no direct connection with the Eurovision Song Contest so just using the Eurovision template for ABU articles isn't a good idea in my opinion. I think creating a new template such as
{{Infobox Song Contest}}
, with flexible parameters to suit each contest as needed would work nicely. When this is done a new TfD can be opened and the old templates can be deleted as redundant. WikiProject Eurovision are capable of doing the full implementation, and merges of templates and other such things had already been proposed before this nomination was made. CT Cooper · talk 15:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Cân i Gymru National Year
- Template:Infobox Cân i Gymru National Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox Eurovision Song Contest National Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox Cân i Gymru National Year with Template:Infobox Eurovision Song Contest National Year.
The Welsh template is an apparent fork of the ESC (European Song Contest) one. They should be re-merged and made suitable (and named) for generic song contests, into which any other such templates may be (re-)merged later. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Question how is this an apparent fork? They are two different contests, one is specific to Wales, the other pan-European. If there are ways to improve a template, then perhaps raising such issues at Project Eurovision talk page would be logical. I get the impression that the nom is mass-nominating quite a lot of Project Eurovision templates, which is quite disturbing behaviour. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- The clue is in the documentation of the Welsh template, which still includes a fragment of the ESC one it was copied from. Please assume good faith; and see Wikipedia:Infobox consolidation for a FAQ explaining why we don't need so many infoboxes doing very similar jobs. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- And remember, Pigsonthewing, one also needs to assume the assumption of good faith. I merely said I got the "impression", that was not being bad faith. Merging the two templates would cause a hyperlink issue; because the syntax within the Eurovision version has things that create a link to Eurovision pages. For example [[{{{Country}}} in the - Eurovision Song Contest]], which allows the need to only input the country, so that it will automatically direct to articles such as Italy in the Eurovision Song Contest. We could not use that for Can i Gymru, as it would create a link to Wales in the Eurovision Song Contest, when there is no such article. The same is for the ABU Radio template which you also nominated. If we used the Eurovision version, it would not direct biennially, and would create annual links. Also it would show at the bottom on the inforbox that it is Eurovision, when we'd need to show it is ABU Radio. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- A merger would not simply copy parameters from one template to another, but would address cases such as those you describe, and build in any necessary alternative parameters or switches. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- So then it would be more logical to discuss those proposals at the project talk page, work on a design that would be able to deal with every type of contest under the project scope - and then the obsolete versions get mass-deleted. This has been done before with other templates at the project. It saved time, and meant the obsolete ones got speedy deleted with no objections. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Templates for discussion is the dedicated forum for such cases. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- So then it would be more logical to discuss those proposals at the project talk page, work on a design that would be able to deal with every type of contest under the project scope - and then the obsolete versions get mass-deleted. This has been done before with other templates at the project. It saved time, and meant the obsolete ones got speedy deleted with no objections. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- A merger would not simply copy parameters from one template to another, but would address cases such as those you describe, and build in any necessary alternative parameters or switches. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- And remember, Pigsonthewing, one also needs to assume the assumption of good faith. I merely said I got the "impression", that was not being bad faith. Merging the two templates would cause a hyperlink issue; because the syntax within the Eurovision version has things that create a link to Eurovision pages. For example [[{{{Country}}} in the - Eurovision Song Contest]], which allows the need to only input the country, so that it will automatically direct to articles such as Italy in the Eurovision Song Contest. We could not use that for Can i Gymru, as it would create a link to Wales in the Eurovision Song Contest, when there is no such article. The same is for the ABU Radio template which you also nominated. If we used the Eurovision version, it would not direct biennially, and would create annual links. Also it would show at the bottom on the inforbox that it is Eurovision, when we'd need to show it is ABU Radio. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- The clue is in the documentation of the Welsh template, which still includes a fragment of the ESC one it was copied from. Please assume good faith; and see Wikipedia:Infobox consolidation for a FAQ explaining why we don't need so many infoboxes doing very similar jobs. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
TfD may be the case, but when we are discussing the possibility of merging a lot of templates so that there is a one-for-all version, then it would make more sense to discuss ideas at a project talk page, and then work on a design that would fit the one-for-all purpose, and then delete all the obsolete ones. That's how I would do it anyway, so that it avoids heated debates like this. Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: the serious breach of WP:CANVASS, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Mass nomination of contest templates.
|
---|
As I have just pointed out at the project talk page, Pickette pointed something out to me, and I have removed comments that may have looked as POV-ish, as that was not what I was trying to do. I was trying to provide a brief line of what rationale you had given - a bit like a news headline saying "debate taking place regarding A, B, and C, with rationales 1, 2, and 3 been given. And also noting that these debates require serious attention. The members are capable enough of making their own decisions, and I noted that fact in my closing line of the post. And now you're trolling through my talk page archives? Why do that, as if to "game the system and prove a point"? Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
|
- Support merge: More heat than light here. The issue is that we have about 10 katrillion infoboxes for every nuance of Eurovision and that isn't an efficient use of infoboxes. To compromise a bit here, if there are some parameters so very special to Eurovision that a generic TV song contest (American Idol, etc) infobox can't encompass everything (I would think a parameter for annual/biannual/qualifying competition, etc would work though) then maybe a generic Eurovision infobox would do, but seems no reason for more than one. Montanabw(talk) 01:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Restructuring, which was in the project's pipeline to begin with, regarding proposals to create "all-in-one" universal infoboxes for contests/festivals within Project Eurovision scope, so that they can be used on any of their respective articles regardless of the type of contest. Request to postpone TfD so that the discussions can conclude and may result in other templates within the project to be deleted en-mass. Wes Mouse | T@lk 01:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. See above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Sanremo Music Festival
- Template:Infobox Sanremo Music Festival (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 11 transclusions)
Overly specific; redundant to {{Infobox music festival}} (or otherwise {{Infobox recurring event}}). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - {{Infobox music festival}} doesn't have the parameters to deal with a complex contest like San Remo. The San Remo Music Festival is not a music festival (despite its name) but is a contest that inspired the creation of Eurovision Song Contest - one could say it is an Italian Song Contest, for people of Italy only. And has been used to also select the Italian entry at Eurovision. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then perhaps it should be merged into the ESC template, as discussed above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Merging would not work, as I pointed out above. It would create linking issues, such as directing to an incorrect article. It is hard to try and explain, so maybe if one looked at the contest articles such as San Remo Music Festival, Eurovision Song Contest, ABU Radio Song Festival, ABU TV Song Festival, then you'd get a better understanding. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- And as I point out above, there are technical means to deal with such matters. I would also remind you about WP:AGF. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- And as noted, one should also assume the assumption of good faith. Constantly telling someone to AGF is an example of misuse; especially one that is to be avoided in deletion discussions. And casting allegations of canvassing is severe disruption if ever I have seen it. Notifying a project of a mass-number of templates that are up for discussion is not canvassing, it is making them aware of a debate and giving them the option to discuss. Wes Mouse | T@lk 21:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- And as I point out above, there are technical means to deal with such matters. I would also remind you about WP:AGF. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Merging would not work, as I pointed out above. It would create linking issues, such as directing to an incorrect article. It is hard to try and explain, so maybe if one looked at the contest articles such as San Remo Music Festival, Eurovision Song Contest, ABU Radio Song Festival, ABU TV Song Festival, then you'd get a better understanding. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then perhaps it should be merged into the ESC template, as discussed above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: the serious breach of WP:CANVASS, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Mass nomination of contest templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support deletion or merge infobox this specific is unneeded, it isn't even used in the main article on the topic. There is a navbox directing users to each year. Seems the necessary parameters can be added to the music festival or something similar. That said, one post on the project talk page, while a bit over the top in tone I don't think is the worst canvassing offense I've seen. However, the poster would be wise to be reminded that he would do better to just post the link with an "of interest" comment. Montanabw(talk) 01:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Restructuring, which was in the project's pipeline to begin with, regarding proposals to create "all-in-one" universal infoboxes for contests/festivals within Project Eurovision scope, so that they can be used on any of their respective articles regardless of the type of contest. Request to postpone TfD so that the discussions can conclude and may result in other templates within the project to be deleted en-mass. Wes Mouse | T@lk 01:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. See above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox ABU Radio
- Template:Infobox ABU Radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Appears to be a fork of {{Infobox Eurovision}}, to which it is redundant. ABU name suggests Australia, but this is also used for Eurovision competitions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - This is used on articles such as ABU Radio Song Festival 2012. Eurovision Song Contest are annual contests, ABU Radio Song Festival are biennial. Using the Eurovision infobox caused navigational issues because of this; and also if the Eurovision version were used it caused linking issues at the bottom of the box, when click on the hyperlink. Wes Mouse | T@lk 19:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then, again, perhaps all these ought to be merged, as discussed above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- We tried to use the Eurovision first, and it caused a link issue. For example at the bottom where it provides links to the previous/next contests. Eurovision is yearly, ABU Radio is biennial - using the Eurovision template on ABU Radio would create yearly links and not biennially links. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- I've already replied to you above, about the technical means which would solve this. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- We tried to use the Eurovision first, and it caused a link issue. For example at the bottom where it provides links to the previous/next contests. Eurovision is yearly, ABU Radio is biennial - using the Eurovision template on ABU Radio would create yearly links and not biennially links. Wes Mouse | T@lk 20:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Then, again, perhaps all these ought to be merged, as discussed above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: the serious breach of WP:CANVASS, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Mass nomination of contest templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support merge with some sort of overall template for Eurovision or ABU, it's silly to have infoboxes that transclude so few articles. And add any needed parameters. Infoboxes and navboxes are not the same thing, an infobox is not a navbox. Montanabw(talk) 01:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Note: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Restructuring, which was in the project's pipeline to begin with, regarding proposals to create "all-in-one" universal infoboxes for contests/festivals within Project Eurovision scope, so that they can be used on any of their respective articles regardless of the type of contest. Request to postpone TfD so that the discussions can conclude and may result in other templates within the project to be deleted en-mass. Wes Mouse | T@lk 01:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- No. See above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Combined discussion
I've grouped these discussions, as it seems there are shared issues. Please feel free to comment here, or under individual headings. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox student media
- Template:Infobox student media (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 21 transclusions)
Superfluous, variously, to {{Infobox radio station}}, {{Infobox television channel}}, {{Infobox website}}, or {{Infobox broadcasting network}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Indeed, what's next? Infobox homework assignment? Montanabw(talk) 01:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Sherlock Holmes short story
- Template:Infobox Sherlock Holmes short story (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 57 transclusions)
Superfluous to {{Infobox short story}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support: You have got to be kidding here, there is a totally separate infobox for this? Absurd! Montanabw(talk) 01:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox pictish stone
- Template:Infobox pictish stone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 20 transclusions)
Superfluous, probably to {{Infobox artifact}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- No strong opinion It has some features that {{Infobox artifact}} doesn't have... but are these important? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 23:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support but merge parameters into infobox artifact so relevant material can be incorporated. Fewer than 50 transclusions. Montanabw(talk) 01:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- keep, not entirely redundant, and this isn't a merge proposal. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Only Fools and Horses
- Template:Infobox Only Fools and Horses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nominator's rationale. Montanabw(talk) 01:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- comment it's unused because I orphaned it. Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned and unused Ghana fb templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per prior consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Fb team Aduana Stars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team All Stars F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Asante Kotoko SC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Bechem United (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Ashanti Gold (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Berekum Arsenal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Berekum Chelsea F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Ebusua Dwarfs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Hearts of Oak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Liberty Professionals F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Real Sportive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Real Tamale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Tema Youth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Fb team Tudu Mighty Jets FC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
These templates are unused or ophaned. They should be deleted. MicroX (talk) 19:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Infobox Satellite awards
- Template:Infobox Satellite awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (only 19 transclusions)
Redundant to {{Infobox film awards}} . Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- keep, not entirely redundant, and this is not a merge proposal. Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Indian awards
- Template:Infobox Indian awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (Only 153 transclusions)
Superfluous to {{Infobox award}} (which has 3,764 transclusions). None of the parameters are specific to India. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support: The Academy Awards use the generic infobox, no reason to Balkanize the rest of the world. If there is a need to merge any parameters into the main infobox, I suggest doing so. Montanabw(talk) 01:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- keep, not entirely redundant, and this is not a merge proposal. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Mosconi Cup
- Template:Infobox Mosconi Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (only 20 transactions)
- Template:Infobox individual snooker tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (385 transclusions)
Propose merging Template:Infobox Mosconi Cup with Template:Infobox individual snooker tournament.
Though pool is not snooker, the formats are similar.There is no generic "Pool tournament" infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Propose creating universal infobox: I suggest creating {{Infobox cue sports}} to encompass everything. Avoids potential US/UK bias.Montanabw(talk) 01:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Response to Pigsonthewing There are many differences in pool and snooker. These infoboxes can never be merged. Gcjdavid (talk) 02:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, they can. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Equity Awards
- Template:Equity Awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused and almost all redirects. Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per all of the above. Montanabw(talk) 01:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)