Yorkshirian (talk | contribs) reply |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:{{tfdlinks|HS LL in Yorkshire}} |
:{{tfdlinks|HS LL in Yorkshire}} |
||
Duplicates other templates {{tl|Lord Lieutenancies}} and {{tl|High Shrievalties}}. [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 17:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
Duplicates other templates {{tl|Lord Lieutenancies}} and {{tl|High Shrievalties}}. [[User:MRSC|MRSC]] • [[User_talk:MRSC|Talk]] 17:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': Not a straight duplicate of those two templates at all, it covers specific High Sheriffs and Lord Lieutenants of an cultural area that are grouped together in acemedic, scholary publications such as "[http://bookshop.blackwell.co.uk/jsp/id/The_Lord_Lieutenants_and_High_Sheriffs_of_Yorkshire_1066_2000/9781871647747 The Lord Lieutenants & High Sheriffs of Yorkshire: 1066-2000]". Extremely useful for those interested in the area. Bad faith nomination. - [[User:Yorkshirian|Yorkshirian]] ([[User talk:Yorkshirian|talk]]) 18:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Non-free currency-EU]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Non-free currency-EU]] ==== |
Revision as of 18:15, 26 June 2008
June 26
Template:HS LL in Yorkshire
- Template:HS LL in Yorkshire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Duplicates other templates {{Lord Lieutenancies}} and {{High Shrievalties}}. MRSC • Talk 17:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a straight duplicate of those two templates at all, it covers specific High Sheriffs and Lord Lieutenants of an cultural area that are grouped together in acemedic, scholary publications such as "The Lord Lieutenants & High Sheriffs of Yorkshire: 1066-2000". Extremely useful for those interested in the area. Bad faith nomination. - Yorkshirian (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Non-free currency-EU
Template:Db-meta-s
- Template:Db-meta-s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Db-t3-s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Much as I would love to slap {{db-t3}}
on these templates, that might be considered a bit pointy. These two templates appear to be forks of {{db-meta}}
created solely for use in tagging templates for deletion under WP:CSD#T3. I'm not entirely sure why MZMcBride felt that the existing {{db-meta}}
and {{db-t3}}
templates were not adequate, but there really is no need for forking one CSD template from the Db- series that seem to work so well. — Happy‑melon 15:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CSD#T3 and nom. DA PIE EATER (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (University of Heidelberg)
- Template:Faculty of Physics and Astronomy (University of Heidelberg) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused navbox with the main article redlinked. Thetrick (talk) 13:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I fixed the red link on the title but all the links below just redirect to the main article. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Thetrick. DA PIE EATER (talk) 17:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Pinoy Idol 1
- Template:Pinoy Idol 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
A fork-ish version of Pinoy Idol template, featuring the finalists who do not have a corresponding Wiki articles yet. This template should be deleted. — Starczamora (talk) 09:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Seems appropriate since Template:American Idol 1 exists. The only issue is that it doesn't link to anything, but that can easily be fixed. DA PIE EATER (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Prophecy
- Template:Prophecy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only two articles use this template, and both articles have notability concerns. Although {{future}} doesn't quite drive home the same point, I feel that template should be used instead. — Anthony Rupert (talk) 05:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I'm not sure that limited transclusion is a good argument for deletion of a template such as this. One might view it as a sign that the template is amazingly effective—all but two of the articles that have been tagged with this template were fixed. {{Future}} doesn't appear to be a suitable substitute. I'm not sure why the editor above wants to delete this template. It's not doing any harm, and storage is cheap. It flags a legitimate problem with an article that should be fixed.--Srleffler (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
“ | All but two of the articles that have been tagged with this template were fixed. | ” |
- Oops; never thought of that. Anthony Rupert (talk) 06:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
(weak)Delete.I think {{tense}} does the same job in a more general context. WP:NOHARM is not a reason to keep it. For maintenance reasons its better to have as less cleanup templates as possible. Prophecy was barely been used. The only reason I find to keep it, it's because {{tense}} doesn't support parameters like "future, past, present" which could activate more specific instructions to the editors instead of the general "Please consider copy editing to past tense if historic, present tense if not time-based (e.g. fiction), or future tense if upcoming". I would suggest improving {{tense}} and merging {{prophecy}} there. Anyone willing to do that? -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)- I noticed that {{Cleanup-rewrite}} can also be used by adding a reason in the template. I still would prefer the improvement of {{tense}} but this just adds to the fact that we have other templates to do the job. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Aremith/Welcome
- Template:Aremith/Welcome (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused user_talk header box thingy. Thetrick (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Instead of TfDing, should I just move templates like this (or this) into the creator's userspace? Is there a policy and a set of notification templates? --Thetrick (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Userfy Based on the template name it seems clear that the creator wants it in their userspace and if that user prefers that template, they should be able to use it. Anonymous101 (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Move to User:Aremith/Welcome or some other subpage of the user that he chooses. However, I'd like to comment that under how the template is written, only Aremith could use it and it seems a bit selfish. DA PIE EATER (talk) 17:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Userfy. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)