192.235.252.195 (talk) |
→27 February 2016: CU results |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===27 February 2016=== |
===27 February 2016=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
;Suspected sockpuppets |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*The two named accounts are between {{unlikely}} and {{inconclusive}}. Tobeme free is hiding behind an anonymous proxy server.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 20:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 20:16, 27 February 2016
Denis.g.rancourt
- Denis.g.rancourt (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
27 February 2016
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Tobeme_free (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Denis.g.rancourt created the Ontario Civil Liberties Association article on 18 July 2015. He was subsequently accused of conflict of interest and admitted an association with the organization. Since then, User:Tobeme_free has been editing the article from the same point of view. User:Tobeme_free's only prior edits had been 6 made on 30 October 2011 before going dormant for over 4 1/2 years and then suddenly springing back to life on 14 Febrauary 2016 to edit the Ontario Civil Liberties Association article and contribute to various talk pages in regards to the article. The only articles User:Tobeme_free has ever edited are Ontario Civil Liberties Association and Dorothy Reitman. In a post made here User:Tobeme_free states "I have communicated with Denis Rancourt in this regard and we both agree that this would be an acceptable solution. While Mr. Rancourt does have a COI related to this page, I do not. I am an Advocate for the cause." and that " last change is (and was) acceptable to both Rancourt and myself" however there is no evidence on either User talk:Tobeme free or User talk:Denis.g.rancourt or anywhere else of the two communicating with each other on wikipedia and, as far as I can tell, their email via wikipedia options are not enabled. This strongly suggests that either they are the same person or, at the very least, that there is meatpuppetry going on.
It also appears taht the User:Tobeme_free account sprang back to life concurrently with User:Denis.g.rancourt being warned about suspected IP sockpuppetry here.
Lastly, there is suspicious IP editing at Denis Rancourt which suggests that Rancourt, who presumably is User:Denis.g.rancourt in real life, has been editing his eponymous article in violation of WP:COI. Concerns about this were made here.
192.235.252.195 (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Tobeme free (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC) I am not a sockpuppet account for Denis Rancourt.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The two named accounts are between Unlikely and Inconclusive. Tobeme free is hiding behind an anonymous proxy server.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)