(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
For the record, it isn't me. I'm the guy that hunts socks, not creates them (I must've reported dozens over the years). I'm not that stupid. I'll also add that the IP altered my edits with his post, linking to "[[Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]]" directly, instead of ''via'' the "[[Democratic Federal Yugoslavia]]" redirect which I introduced several times ("[[Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]]" is anachronistic as the infobox applies to the year 1944 and "Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" was the name instituted in 1963). |
|||
''P.S.'' That IP is from Canada if I'm not mistaken. I am currently in [[Split, Croatia|Split]], [[Croatia]]. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 00:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
::On the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASerbia_under_German_occupation&action=historysubmit&diff=443093919&oldid=443079864 DIREKTOR argued] that socialist Serbia should not be listed among successor states and removal of socialist Serbia from list of successor states is common for DIREKTOR and involved IP. There are no other involved users that supported this removal of successor state. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] 19:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
::On the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASerbia_under_German_occupation&action=historysubmit&diff=443093919&oldid=443079864 DIREKTOR argued] that socialist Serbia should not be listed among successor states and removal of socialist Serbia from list of successor states is common for DIREKTOR and involved IP. There are no other involved users that supported this removal of successor state. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] 19:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::Also, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASerbia_under_German_occupation&action=historysubmit&diff=443230869&oldid=443210018 DIREKTOR argued] that these symbols (flag and coat arms) are symbols "of the Government of National Salvation" and IP actually posted these symbols into article about that government: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Government_of_National_Salvation_%28Serbia%29&action=historysubmit&diff=443646597&oldid=442491116] [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] 19:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
:::Also, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASerbia_under_German_occupation&action=historysubmit&diff=443230869&oldid=443210018 DIREKTOR argued] that these symbols (flag and coat arms) are symbols "of the Government of National Salvation" and IP actually posted these symbols into article about that government: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Government_of_National_Salvation_%28Serbia%29&action=historysubmit&diff=443646597&oldid=442491116] [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] 19:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
::::They ''are'' the flag & coa of that government, since that government instituted them. And that government does not represent Serbia, which we've agreed is a name for the territory. The supreme authority in the Serbia territory was the German Military Administration. --<font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:DIREKTOR|<font color="DimGray">DIREKTOR</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<font color="Gray">TALK</font>]])</sup></font> 01:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 01:29, 9 August 2011
DIREKTOR
- DIREKTOR (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
08 August 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
User:DIREKTOR was recently baned from editing of all Balkans articles and talkpages, broadly construed, for 6 months. This was his last edit in one Balkan article before he noticed that he is banned. That edit was then reverted by another user, but after 3 days an IP number appeared and made a change in that article that is similar to last change of User:DIREKTOR. There should be check is there an connection between that IP and User:DIREKTOR. It seems to me that he using this IP to avoid block. PANONIAN 18:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
For the record, it isn't me. I'm the guy that hunts socks, not creates them (I must've reported dozens over the years). I'm not that stupid. I'll also add that the IP altered my edits with his post, linking to "Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" directly, instead of via the "Democratic Federal Yugoslavia" redirect which I introduced several times ("Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" is anachronistic as the infobox applies to the year 1944 and "Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" was the name instituted in 1963).
P.S. That IP is from Canada if I'm not mistaken. I am currently in Split, Croatia. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 00:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm sorry, but I don't see enough evidence of a connection here to warrant any action. Why is it DIREKTOR and not one of a hundred other users involved in this topic area? TNXMan 19:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- On the talk page DIREKTOR argued that socialist Serbia should not be listed among successor states and removal of socialist Serbia from list of successor states is common for DIREKTOR and involved IP. There are no other involved users that supported this removal of successor state. PANONIAN 19:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also, DIREKTOR argued that these symbols (flag and coat arms) are symbols "of the Government of National Salvation" and IP actually posted these symbols into article about that government: [1] PANONIAN 19:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- They are the flag & coa of that government, since that government instituted them. And that government does not represent Serbia, which we've agreed is a name for the territory. The supreme authority in the Serbia territory was the German Military Administration. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 01:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also, DIREKTOR argued that these symbols (flag and coat arms) are symbols "of the Government of National Salvation" and IP actually posted these symbols into article about that government: [1] PANONIAN 19:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- On the talk page DIREKTOR argued that socialist Serbia should not be listed among successor states and removal of socialist Serbia from list of successor states is common for DIREKTOR and involved IP. There are no other involved users that supported this removal of successor state. PANONIAN 19:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)