Requesting full protection of User talk:LaruaWA11. |
unnecessary, I'm still here |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Current requests for protection== |
==Current requests for protection== |
||
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}} |
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}} |
||
==== {{lut|LaruaWA11}} ==== |
|||
'''indefinite full protection''' ''User talk of banned user'', User abusing helpme and unblock templates (already denied an unblock), as well as making uncivil comments. User is indef blocked so no reason to leave page unprotected while the user is being disruptive. .[[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 05:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==== {{la|Bates method}} ==== |
==== {{la|Bates method}} ==== |
||
'''temporary semi-protection''' ''Vandalism'', Lots of IP vandalism lately...from many different IP addresses..[[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 05:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
'''temporary semi-protection''' ''Vandalism'', Lots of IP vandalism lately...from many different IP addresses..[[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 05:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:56, 2 January 2008
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | |
---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for protection
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Bates method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Lots of IP vandalism lately...from many different IP addresses..Rjd0060 (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for 5 days - I initially thought two weeks was too harsh. Nonetheless, page protected. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 05:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection, multiple annon ips attacking page tonight. Redfarmer (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected Mr.Z-man 04:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Spider-Man 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection Dispute, was previously salted and protected; please restore protection until May 2008 (or preferably later, given article content); way too much crystal-ballery..The Evil Spartan (talk) 03:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kusma (talk) 04:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Israeli-Palestinian conflict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full-protect. High level of edit-warring. Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 03:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr.Z-man 03:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Alexfusco5/guestbook ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
semi-protection , and move protection user subpage for signatures by registered users only.Alexfusco5 02:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
User:NASCAR Fan24 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, After a rash of vandalism this morning, this is sadly the second time in four months that I have to request my userpage be protected. Both users are now indef blocked, but I don't want to take any chances..NF24(radio me!) 01:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. jj137 ♠ 01:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Twelve Sky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Request for Semi-Protection for the 12-Sky MMORPG wikipedia page. 12-Sky is part of a large Gaming Company (AeriaGames & Entertainment)and does not wish to begin the Vandalism that may come, just like with most online games. We don't want people to ruin the information that people may learn from the article.DittoX1 (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - also note that
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Vandalism, A lot of unknown users, malicious editing this page. --Duchamps_comb MFA 00:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined. east.718 at 02:11, January 2, 2008
Lakota people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Vandalism, A lot of unknown users, blanking, edit warring, and POV warriors using the phrase "Nazi sympathizers."--Duchamps_comb MFA 00:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected. Looks like an edit war to me, should be discussed on the talk page and/or employ dispute resolution. Semi protection would have little effect on registered users. Mr.Z-man 03:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Ganesha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High level of IP vandalism. Majority of the edits made in the last 15 days are nothing but vandalism and reverts..Nn123645 (talk) 22:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism since yesterday. The majority of the previous vandal edits will have been as a result of article being featured on the Main Page. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Green Party (Ireland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
medium-term semi-protection (for a few months). Repeated deletion by IPs of material relating to the policy compromises involved in the Green Party's participation in a coalition government. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Leighton Andrews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect This article has been subject to a number of interventions that seem to be possibly libelous and/or in breach of wikipedia policy. The edits and reversions by the user Darren Wyn Rees are particularly problematic. They appear to be in breach of both Wikipedia's rules and the UK libel laws. First he has inserted material which challenges the subject's sincerity in supporting the Burberry workers. That suggests defamation - and malicious defamation at that. Second, he is clearly using the article to make a personal attack on the subect. Third, he is removing valid source references from respected sources, eg the BBC, and replacing them with a source from an obscure blog. Looking at both the blog and Darren Wyn Rees's page on Wikipedia, he is either the the blogger - whom he sought to quote on this article - or closely allied to him/her. If he is the blogger, then replacing legitimate sourced references to cite a quote from his own blog is, to say the least, narcissistic. It is certainly not objective. Penpych (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Also, semi-protection would have no effect on Darren Wyn Rees to edit. Mr.Z-man 03:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Cold fusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Back to semi. The edit warring is continuing as one editor is using his admin privileges to continue editing. I'm also not sure who requested full protection and don't think there's a consensus for it. Although there's an edit war going on there is also plenty of discussion; neutral editors are around; there's a chance of moving towards consensus. Itsmejudith (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined This issue is being discussed at WP:ANI, I believe. You're going to have to make a case there. bibliomaniac15 21:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Current requests for significant edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Fulfilled/denied requests
Signs (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
temporary semi-protection. Repeated vandalism by IPs in the Plot section of the movie. RaiderTarheel (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. jj137 ♠ 22:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Pandyan Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Edit war is underway. Page was protected for one week, but no discussion took place in that time. Block was lfited; war resumes. Posted a report on Incidents page, it was suggested I request page protection. StephenBuxton (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Labyrinth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite semi-protection I can't quite describe it. You're going to have to see it yourself. The article had been vandalized numerous times to the point that restoration is troublesome. AllStarZ (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 21:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
User talk:142.162.195.15 ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
temporary semi-protection User talk of banned user, User keeps replacing page with insults against the project and User:KnowledgeOfSelf.Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 18:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected until expiry of block. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 19:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
User talk:69.246.79.189 ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, expiration - 1 week. Death threats..The Evil Spartan (talk) 15:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 42 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Sock ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
full protection High-visible template, Redirect with thousands of uses, none of which is very popular..The Evil Spartan (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Australia's Next Top Model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect Vandalism / Misleading / Unconfirmed information, Trying again for semi-protection after being declined about two weeks ago. The above issues are involved with the edits of IP address users who continously add information which is clearly against WP:CRYSTAL, despite my constant reverts. IP blocks on individual addresses would be useless due to different IP address users making the changes. --Lakeyboy (talk) 14:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined - not enough vandalism in a short time period. east.718 at 15:37, January 1, 2008
User:67.135.49.177 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
unprotection , I've tried to discuss protection of this IP talkpage with the blocking admin and I'm not understanding why it has been protected. This is apparently the IP of a registered user who is not blocked or banned, and who apparently has not violated the sock policy. The Meta privacy policy allows users to edit while they are not logged in. The protecting admin seems to have been involved in a dispute with this editor when protecting this page. All in all, I'm not liking the forced "outing" of a registered user's IP by making them keep this template on their talkpage for no policy-based reason that I can see..Videmus Omnia Talk 16:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Declined - I sympathize, but the administrators' noticeboard is a better venue for this. east.718 at 15:36, January 1, 2008
Itchy & Scratchy Land (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection A random user who has come back multiple times with random IPs has been adding speculation to the page and has been "backing" it up with sources that do not pass WP:RS. The user has been reverted several times an notified of the policy, but every time he just reverts and is insulting and has shown no desire to take it to the talk page. Because he can easily switch IPs, the page should be semi-protected, then the user may be more willing to discuss it. -- Scorpion0422 05:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SkierRMH (talk) 08:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Specter01010 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, A lot of anons attacking this userpage..Kesac (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected. —Kurykh 07:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Gonorrhea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Article has been vandalized about 10 times within the past several hours, and continue to do so for a while in the past..Dan LeveilleTALK 06:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Joe Quesada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protected. Increased vandalism for ruining Spider-Man in One More Day storyline. Volume of nonproductive edits/vandalism high since 12/27. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 01:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC).
Semi-protected by Od Mishehu. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High volume of vandalism happening lately, I suggest it is protected until the New Years festivities are over, January 2nd. Save-Me-Oprah (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Landmark Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protect. (Check logs and page history.) Edit-warring started up again shortly after the last Full Protect was removed. Suggest a longer full protect this time (I think the last one was 5 days) so that issues can be discussed on talk page and possible dispute resolution pursued, instead of back and forth edit-warring. Cirt (talk) 01:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Fads and trends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protection Multiuser edit war. Suggest removing all video game systems from the list before protecting. MillenniumX (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Note that I am not allowed to make any content edits to the page before protecting it, but must leave it as it was. It is likely the wrong version, sorry. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Councillors of City of Glen Eira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from possible former Glen Eira councillors having a go at each other - this is inappropriate and it must stop. --CatonB (talk) 02:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Falsetto register (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protection. Edit warring, possibly sock-enhanced, to restore a fork of article Falsetto, against consensus in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falsetto (a bad-faith deletion nom by the edit warrior). Per the Afd, the protected version should be the redirect. (More info on WP:ANI and WP:SSP.) / edg ☺ ☭ 04:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Fully protected Done. Thanks much! / edg ☺ ☭ 23:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)