(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Semi-protect''' IP vandalism (cmon AD, you can beat DarkFalls! :P ) ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 07:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
'''Semi-protect''' IP vandalism (cmon AD, you can beat DarkFalls! :P ) ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 07:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:{{RFPP|s|2 weeks}} :) -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
:{{RFPP|s|2 weeks}} :) -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
{| style="border: 1px solid grey; background-color: transparent; font-size: 8pt; width: 100%;" class="collapsible collapsed" |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
⚫ | ::: |
||
!align="center"| Ensuing banter... |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|We seemed to have protected on the same second... --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 07:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:Check the history! I got there first :P -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:: |
::I was more descriptive.... and I put the tag up first... --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 07:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | :::Your description had ''one'' more character than mine... and I reported here first... :P -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
:::: |
::::No it didn't. Mine said "Change protection level" Much more professional... --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 07:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::: |
::::ROFL... ''and in one corner of the RFPP ring, we have...'' ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 07:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | ::::::....(the handsome, intelligent and generally spectacular) Pizzaboy, and in the other corner, we have just plain old DarkFalls... ;) -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ::::Ahhh of course. You do have a point there :P -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|||
===={{la|KFC}}==== |
===={{la|KFC}}==== |
||
Line 35: | Line 40: | ||
Ironic '''semi-protect''' heightened IP vandalism (it's the first amendment, but free speech aside...) ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 06:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
Ironic '''semi-protect''' heightened IP vandalism (it's the first amendment, but free speech aside...) ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 06:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:{{RFPP|ap}} by DarkFalls -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 06:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
:{{RFPP|ap}} by DarkFalls -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 06:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
{| style="border: 1px solid grey; background-color: transparent; font-size: 8pt; width: 100%;" class="collapsible collapsed" |
|||
::Too slow pizzaboy :P --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 06:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | ::: |
||
!align="center"| Yet more banter... |
|||
::::The caffeine should make you react faster... Even then... too slow. --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 06:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Too slow pizzaboy :P --[[User:DarkFalls|<font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">D<sub>ark</sub>F<sub>alls</sub></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 06:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: |
::I was drinking a coke with one hand. How can I protect like that?! :) -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 06:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ::::Lol we manage to have discussion everywhere. Listen, since you are around - mind helping with [[CAT:CSD]] once you have finished doing whatever you are doing? It'd be appreciated... -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 06:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::::Does the first amendment allow such admin-admin disrespecting?! :P ~[[User:Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF" face="Comic Sans Ms">'''Eliz'''</font>]][[User_talk:Eliz81|<font face="Comic Sans Ms" color="9966CC">'''81'''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Eliz81|<font color="1E90FF">(C)</font>]]</sup> 06:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::What - to me as pizzaboy or to DarkFalls as unicellular organism? Just kidding ;) -- <strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 07:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
===={{la|List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes}}==== |
===={{la|List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes}}==== |
Revision as of 12:28, 12 September 2007
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | |
---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for protection
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Chris Benoit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect IP vandalism (cmon AD, you can beat DarkFalls! :P ) ~Eliz81(C) 07:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. :) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Ensuing banter... |
---|
We seemed to have protected on the same second... --DarkFalls talk 07:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
KFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect, permanent. IP vandalism, roughly 18-20 times this month already. The article has had forms of vandalism that range from stupid things (See IP address 75.109.93.147 below) to patently offensive racism (usually towards African Americans). An "editor" at IP address 75.109.93.147 has targeted the article for a fictitious country that he creates and adds weird information about how the company expanded its locations throughout it in a ridiculously small amount of time. He did this on the Wendy's article for weeks before I had put in a request for SP. - Jerem43 07:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls talk 07:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank You, but could you please review the time frame? It has been temporarily protected before and that did not seem to do the trick, I really think that it needs to put on SPP like the other major Fast food articles that were subject to high levels of vandalism. - Jerem43 07:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
First Amendment to the United States Constitution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Ironic semi-protect heightened IP vandalism (it's the first amendment, but free speech aside...) ~Eliz81(C) 06:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Already protected. by DarkFalls -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Yet more banter... |
---|
Too slow pizzaboy :P --DarkFalls talk 06:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Skeletor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protect. To stop edit war and bring parties to discussion on talk page. --Strothra 03:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - please resolve the matter on the talk page. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
BulletBall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full-protect. Keithn is constantly disrupting the page against concensus established in an AfD discussion. He considers that the concensus is invalid and has therefore decided to change the article as he pleases. Slartibartfast (1992) 02:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined. The discussion was put back to afd per WP:DPR#NAC, and I urge you to stop edit warring over it. --DarkFalls talk 06:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Moulton ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
full-protect: Banned user who has exhausted the community's patience, see his RFC and the Noticeboard. Continues to use his talk page as a platform for his grievances against those that disagree with him. His page should be protected in order to prevent him from continuing to post his complaints and to prevent others from feeding the troll. Baegis 01:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
List of Camp Lazlo episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect: page was on semi-protect for a week, just came out of semi-protect, and already the IP editors are at it again. Yngvarr 00:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for another week. Maybe they'll lose interest. - Philippe | Talk 02:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Seann William Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism regarding statements alleged made on "the Opie and Anthony show". A couple of days would hopefully be enough. Ebyabe 00:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thomas Hobbes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-Protection: heightened IP vandalism. ~Eliz81(C) 23:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 23:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Sean Kingston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-Protection: Requesting semi protection for this article due to recent vandalism from unregistered users. The93owner 23:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
BASIC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, Constant IP vandalism.-Toon05 23:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection +expiry 1 day, Full protection: Dispute, Multi-contributor edit war..Leuko 22:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected no expiry set to allow discussion. Acalamari 23:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Lloyd Banks discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Literally, yes literally every IP (except one) has added unsourced record sales sales since being unprotected on August 20.Spellcast 21:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Christina Aguilera discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection Continued unsourced & inflated record sales from anons after unprotection. Shows no signs of stopping in the slightest. Spellcast 21:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 21:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protection - There has been back-and-forth reversions between an IP editor and a registered editor for the past several days, with the IP editor so far not participating in a discussion in the Talk page about the dispute. A semi-protection request was earlier denied, with the closing admin citing that page protection is not meant to seperate IP editors and registered editors in a content dispute.[1] So I am requesting full protection for it. There are avenues to explore to come to a concensus on a dispute, but I also want an immediate stop to the edit war while we try to come to concensus. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Connecticut Colony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semiprotect Frequent IP vandalism from a range of IPs. --TrustTruth 20:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:RGTraynor/Archive3 ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection +expiry 1 day Range of an IP address vandalizing this page. NHRHS2010 Talk 20:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Kazakhstan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection +expiry 1 week, Semi protection: Vandalism, Continuous addition of "Borat" nonsense. This issue has already been discussed on the talk page and a consensus has been reached regarding the fact that Borat should not be mentioned at all on the article. Anonymous users seem fit to continue to add it..VegitaU 19:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for 1 week. --Haemo 20:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Mother insult (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semiprotect - heavy IP vandalism. All edits from IPs are completely useless. The Evil Spartan 18:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined there's only been one incident of vandalism since the semi-protection expired yesterday. Acalamari 18:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Walther P22 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protect - I would do it myself, but I'm involved. An edit war going on. There are two seperate issues. One was a talk page consensus AGAINST referencing the Ebay ban on firearms magazines. That was a recent clear consensus. The other was a few months back (it's archived on the talk page), where there was no consensus (leaning towards against), that the Walther P22 article should be linked to the Virginia Tech shooting. Neither consensus has changed. Editors User:Asams10 and User:Griot have both been attempting to change this edit against consensus. I would protect myself, but I was involved in the formulation of that consensus. The correct consensus version is this version.⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 18:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Already protected by User:Reedy Boy --Haemo 20:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Chinese language Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protect. A user continues copying the whole texts from Chinese Wikipedia and replaces the redirect .--✉ Hello World! 18:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected Acalamari 18:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
List of animals displaying homosexual behavior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection - frequent vandalism by IPs. This won't stop some of the edit warring but it hopefully wll help slow it down. Benjiboi 17:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Withdraw request. After looking through the history it's registered users who are also causing issues and the volume is not that great. Benjiboi 22:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Jordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection - frequent vandalism (all types) by a dynamically-changed IPs. Smart_Viral (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. After the week has passed, the page will no longer be semi-protected. Acalamari 17:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection - repeatedly being hit by an anon who keeps jumping anon IDs. Corvus cornix 15:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 17:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection - An IP editor keeps making a valid edit in the past few days that keeps being reverted by a registered editor. But IP editor has made no attempt at discussion. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined — a content dispute between a single IP editor and another user is not a reason to protect the page. --Haemo 20:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Health (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 3 hours, Semi protection: Vandalism, Lots of anon vandalism today.Spryde 11:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Only 3 anon editors today; it would be better to have these blocked rather than semiprotect the page. Waggers 11:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Craig Brewster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect Frequent adding of nonsense nicknames from IP addresses - I have reverted three times in the last week. Vandalism is always one of two forms, either changing middle name or adding 'known as' nickname. Fedgin | Talk 10:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined, Only three instances of vandalism in the last two weeks don't seem to constitute enough activity to warrant protection at this time. Should this pattern increase, please feel free to re-submit. Phaedriel - 10:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Electric Guitar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Sorenw 10:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Phaedriel - 10:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The Chaser's War on Everything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect It is reasonably expected that the article will be innundated with vandalism over the next few days, with a controversial segment being broadcast in 24 hours, with regards to a controversial stunt undertaken by the television program during APEC Australia 2007. A semi-protect is requested in order to reduce any vandalism that will take place in the next few days. Stickeylabel 09:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - what you say is correct, and there has been a bit of vandalism all the same. 1 week should cover things. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Richard III of England (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect Frequent vandalism adding silly information, generally from anonymous users on a fairly regular basis. Bevo74 06:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The Need (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect Frequent vandalism changing the article to discuss a non-notable band with the same name. Vandalism is coming from a promo account as well as several IPs. Requesting semi-protection to eliminate at least IP editing, and possibly a block of the user, which will be discussed here. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 05:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --DarkFalls talk 06:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Computer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 1 week, Semi-protection: Vandalism, vandilism of new users and ips over recent days Blacksmith talk 05:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC).Blacksmith talk 05:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls talk 06:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Paramore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect; vandals persisting in replacing the band's genre with "best band" or other similar vandalism. Hardly any positive contribution at all recently. Sebi [talk] 05:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - hopefully this can stem the problem. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Distribution (business) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 1 day, Semi-protection: Vandalism, IP vandals tag teaming article..Dean Wormer 05:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls talk 06:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Tito Ortiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism.east.718 03:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls talk 06:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Videos of Osama bin Laden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, Because of the approaching date (September 11th), and the fact that people will start searching "Osama Bin Laden" increasing traffic, and the persistent recent vandalism on this page (other than a few good edits done recently by registered users), I'm asking to please semi-protect this page for the next 24 hours so anon IP's can't vandalize it. Thank you .DigitalNinja 03:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined There is only 1 recent vandalism edit. We don't do pre-emptive protection. Feel free to request again if it gets bad. Mr.Z-man 04:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Gianluigi Buffon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism; nonsense information about "Claudio Palmiero" constantly added in family section by unregistered users; reverted three times in the past five days alone. Beemer69 03:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mr.Z-man 04:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Dimebag Darrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. τßōиЄ2001 02:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - hopefully the great amount of IP vandalism will have stemmed after this time. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Wangan Midnight Maximum Tune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection: Vandalism, out of the recent 40 edits there are up to 10 of them are the ones adding false or unsourced information repeatedly. This situation has been going on for 6 days now. Blackhawk charlie2003 02:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Stalinism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 119 of last 225 edits have been vandalism by Runtshit sockpuppets, or reversion..RolandR 01:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - maybe this might cool things off a bit. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Fourth International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 64 of last 86 edits have been Runtshit vandalism and reversion.RolandR 01:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Malcolm (talk) 01:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- So how much is "enough"? All twelve edits this month have been vandalism or reversion. RolandR 01:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
User:DoubleCross ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
semi-protection +expiry 1 month, Semi-protection: Vandalism, This page is frequently being vandalized by various IP's and should be protected as I am constantly reverting it..Wikidudeman (talk) 00:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected ~ Riana ⁂ 00:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hadash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 44 of last 64 edits have been Runtshit vandalism or reversion.RolandR 00:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Uri Avnery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 68 of last 132 edits have been vandalism by Runtshit sockpuppets, or reversion.RolandR 00:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Gush Shalom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 84 of last 92 edits have been vandalism by Runtshit sockpuppets, or reversion. .RolandR 00:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected with no set expiry ~ Riana ⁂ 00:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Trotskyism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 176 of last 331 edits have been Runtshit vandalism or reversion, and there has been other, unrelated vandalism..RolandR 00:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected with no set expiry ~ Riana ⁂ 00:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Istrian exodus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection in edit -23:10, 10 September 2007 151.33.95.148 (Talk) (15,327 bytes) (→Events of 1943)-: long edit warring and disruption for impossible agreement. Unlogged for technical problem PIO 00:29, 11 September 2007
- Admins are not allowed to protect on a specific edit; see meta:The Wrong Version. Also, they cannot protect a specific section from editing (as it looks like you're asking them to); they can only protect the whole article. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 00:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fully protected! Please, who knows what they could put there! Actually, it’s your descision. If you think the page’s protection needs an expiration date. Then let your voice be heard!:)--Angel David 00:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Full protection is used for disputes, I see none. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Proletariat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, 22 of last 42 edits have been Runtshit vandalism or reversion.RolandR 00:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected with no set expiry ~ Riana ⁂ 00:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Matzpen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, Frequent target of Runtshit vandal; 73 of last 121 edits have been vandalism or reversion.RolandR 00:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected with no set expiry ~ Riana ⁂ 00:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Asafa Powell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 1 day, Semi-protection: Vandalism, Page has been vandalised every couple of hours by IPs, request proection until after media attention has died down.-Toon05 00:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Riana ⁂ 00:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Class consciousness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, Frequent target of Runtshit vandal; 28 of the last 31 edits have been vandalism or reversion..RolandR 23:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected with no set expiry ~ Riana ⁂ 00:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Penncrest High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi. Vandalism from many ips, request protection for a week Surfeited 23:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected bibliomaniac15 15 years of trouble and general madness 00:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Microsoft Windows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, Protect because of high levels of anon vandalism. .Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 23:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. by User:Academic Challenger. bibliomaniac15 15 years of trouble and general madness 00:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Grandmastergalvatron ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I am requesting indefinite semi protection of my user page because of vandal problems. A long time ago there was thins one vandal who persisted on British spellings in articles. Per guidelines, the American spellings were used as the articles started with those. Ever since then, he's been attacking me and other users and articles by adding loads of stupid comments and changing pages. He's been blocked like 100 times but appears to have a dynamic IP address. The RC partollers are helping, but not enough, and I'm personally tired of it. No matter the decision, thanks for reading.GrandMasterGalvatron 23:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Mr.Z-man 23:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Renewable energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi. Regular IP vandalism, with very few constructive edits coming from IP addresses. Johnfos 22:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 22:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:JetLover ( | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protect for 3 days Check the history, sockpuppeteer. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for three days. Acalamari 22:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Asturias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protect. IP vandalism on the rise, most edits in the last 2 weeks. Figarema |Talk 22:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Acalamari 22:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
User:JetLover ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi protect for a week User:Naius socks and a vandal with a dynamic IP are out for blood. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a week. Acalamari 22:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Dimitris Spanoulis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi. Ongoing IP vandalism due to the fact that the page has been proposed for deletion.The IP addresses deny to participate in the discussion so they keep removing the deletion tag. Sergiogr 21:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined. Technically, users are allowed to remove a PROD tag from an article, although they should give a decent reason for doing so. The PROD process is only to be used for articles whose deletion is fairly uncontroversial. Obviously, there is a controversy here, so please do not restore the tag and instead take this article to Articles for Deletion. Thanks, Satori Son 21:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Southern California InFocus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
protect. Edit warring, esp. drive-by reverts by users who refuse to participate in discussion or whose participation is limited to cryptic non-sequiturs. csloat 19:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. MastCell Talk 19:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Sands Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi. Ongoing multiple IP vandalism. • Lawrence Cohen 18:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. MastCell Talk 19:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Asana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
While dialoguing at Talk:Asana on the correct word for the article and what should be the plural form of asana, User:Empacher cited from telephone calls and gives a list, which does not reflect the claims he makes. After disclosing this, he has been making edits to the article Asana, by roughly erasing pieces of the article. These are important parts, in which he erases for instance parts of Dharma Mittra, which is a leading yogi. This is not a serious user that tries to develop Wikipedia. I.e. he brought up Mittra, when he needed him to support his claim. Later he erases great parts of the article. Can he please be held off the article? Davin7 17:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. You may be looking for dispute resolution rather than page protection, though. MastCell Talk 19:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Sarah Silverman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 1 week, Semi-protection: Vandalism, A lot of vandalism in just 1 day, I can see it getting worse as Sarah Silverman made some comments about Britney Spears at the MTV Music Awards last night, that seemed to have caused a lot of "pro-Britney" users to vandalise this article. A week or less of semi protection for people to cool down a bit..Ryan4314 16:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Was coming here to request the same thing. I suggest it be semid for a longer period of time - perhaps 2 weeks. Eusebeus 17:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for two weeks. Acalamari 17:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
2008 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism, and it has been getting much worse over the past week or two. I am not sure what an appropriate length would be for this protectionFrank Anchor 02:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Some good edits coming through from anons, don't want to filter those out. I'll put it on my watchlist to help out with the vandalism ~ Riana ⁂ 06:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Parsippany Hills High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Has already been blatantly vandalized by IPs three times, and there was a small edit war over the school's motto. The motto is "Knowledge is Power" and numerous times I have found it changed by IPs to "Knowledge is Good." Shanem201 23:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Beyoncé Knowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Has been an object of harsh vandalisms. The page was edited with derogatory words, phrases and/or remarks that discredits the person involved without any basis or source. BritandBeyonce 07:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- But what if, after the 2 weeks, vandalism will thrive again? Is it possible to semi-protect it all the time to avoid such? BritandBeyonce 10:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Let us see how things are after 2 weeks. If the vandalism persists, then it can be protected longer. Please remember this is the free encyclopedia anyone can edit; let us not rush ourselves to take this away. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- But what if, after the 2 weeks, vandalism will thrive again? Is it possible to semi-protect it all the time to avoid such? BritandBeyonce 10:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, you're right. BritandBeyonce 12:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Ethathea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. yes it does exist, please see the url below. thanks
Ethathea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. no edits allowed on the page to expand the list of school in Indonesia. Many good schools are not listed in here.
Ronald Reagan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. There was an edit war over the lead of this article, leading to its full protection on September 9. Since then, editors have reached a concensus on what should be written, thus the need to edit is now essential. Happyme22 03:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Zen Cart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. An editor, User:Mikkalai, involved in an edit dispute has protected the page himself, protecting his favoured version. Besides this being a clear conflict of interest and abuse of an administrators privileges, the lone editor seems to be the only contributer with a dispute. Greenman 01:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- False. I am not involved in any content dispute. The article is protected because a bunch of fans keeps deleting the notability tag without minimal addresing the concern. Currently the article is just a description of software tool and nothing else. `'Míkka 03:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Notability doesn't depend on what's written in Wikipedia or what's not. The software has a number of independent reviews on the internet, two books and a community forum with almost half a million posts and 40,000 members. These are definitely strong arguments in favor of the subject's notability. In exchange Mikka cannot offer any valid arguments about why he thinks the subject in not notable. Instead for some non-obvious reasons, he abuses the power and authority he has in Wikipedia and enforces his point of view on the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.122.36.23 (talk) 05:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Mikka's bias is obvious since he feels free to call the project "pet soft" and actions of people disagreeing with him "angry powerless bitching of a disgruntled owner". This is disgraceful and hurts Wikipedia image in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.122.36.23 (talk) 06:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Jeff Garlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. No edits are allowed currently.
- Declined That's what full protection does. Is there a reason for wanting this unprotected? Mr.Z-man 00:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Asana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. Edit protection pre-emtive and premature. Reversion by editor Davin7 pre-emted edit by Empacher in excess of 2,000 words, plus Talk page notes, that would have addressed concerns. --Empacher 14:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Opposed. The excess of 2,000 words is what Empacher erased and what I corrected. Next to that Empacher went on by intimidating instead of by looking for the dialogue at talk:asana. Not a good sign for an unprotect of the article. Davin7 17:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Hindutva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotect. protected in June to stop edit-warring. Doldrums 10:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Already unprotected by User:Navou --Haemo 20:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Gough Whitlam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotection +expiry 1 week, Unprotection, Lots of vandal by IP users..DogGunn 04:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Presumably you want protection? Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls talk 08:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
IPod touch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
unprotection +expiry 1 week, Unprotection, New images, lots of vandalism..DogGunn 04:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Race and ancient Egypt (controversies) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protected since August 24, almost 2 weeks and four days ago. The discussion is stale. Muntuwandi 04:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined — there is still discussion, as a a few days ago on the talk page. Unprotected when disputes are concluded; not to begin edit warring again. --Haemo 20:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Snoop Dogg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Protected since August 4; the last instance of vandalism was August 24. --Andrewlp1991 04:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected - will have to be reprotected if issues begin once more. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:CongBio ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I know it's high risk. That's absolutely true. However, can't it be opened up to semi-protection? I'd really love to be able to edit this template I created, but I'm not ready to apply for administatorship.—Markles 00:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined - Used on almost 10,000 articles. If you want a change made (and there isn't much to change), use {{editprotected}}. Mr.Z-man 02:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jeff Garlin ( | article | history | links | watch | logs)
It's not possible to propose page changes without at least semi-protection: while I see why Jeff Garlin is protected temporarily, I don't really understand why users shouldn't be allowed to access the talk page.
Malhotra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Stale protection, protected since May, no discussion since May. Studerby 09:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected -- Done. --Haemo 20:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
===={{
Current requests for significant edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Nobody's Daughter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. I've been in contact with the manager of Courtney Love's website and myspace page, and he would like certain inaccurate sections of the article regarding her new album, Nobody's Daughter, removed, including the image which has been posted as the album cover. This album cover has not been released yet and much of the track information is false. Matthewbdunn 01:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined I have no way of verifying what you said is true or not. They should contact OTRS instead. Mr.Z-man 00:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Film ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I've been doing some major overhauling to the template, which was cut/pasted from a prototype on my user space to the template article. Unfortunately, there are still some minor bugs that need to be resolved, and it's difficult for me to get admins to make my requested changes. I'd like to request a temporary downgrade to semi-protection for one week in order to allow me to implement needed edits. Many thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - just re-request here or contact me directly and I'll move it back up to full protection. Thanks for your work on the template. - Philippe | Talk 22:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Godzilla: Unleashed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
An editor seems to have flown in to remove sourced content without explanation right before the article was protected. This was unrelated to the edit war that got it protected in the first place. The edits started right here. 21:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Would someone please to restore the content? Just64helpin 23:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Done WjBscribe 01:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Pokémon movies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Just what the hell is going on here? Why is this page protected from recreation? This is a damn good redirect to List of Pokémon Anime Films, but I can't do anything about this since the page is protected from recreation, yet I see nothing in the log. TheBlazikenMaster 10:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected - I think that's a very valid point, especially given the page has actually never been created. If it becomes a problem later, we can deal with it in other ways - Alison ☺ 12:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Immigration to Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I am attempting to add useful and accurate information to this page, including links to relevant legislation and comparisons to other jurisdictions. I request that the entry be reverted to my last edit, or some reasonable variation. jbdelaporte 23:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Declined - we're not going to revert to a previous version, which would have us taking part in an edit war. You may use the {{editprotected}} tag on the article talk page, with your suggested changes, and we can evaluate whether to make those changes on your behalf. - Philippe | Talk 23:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I find this very confusing. I thought the instructions were to only use the tag for a minor edit.jbdelaporte 00:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Khojaly Massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
At Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR I asked for a large number of reversions in content disputes by the user Francis Tyers. The article were protected by all the Wiki users in last variant reverted by Francis Tyers. Some parts of reverts even arent explained in the talk page! For example he never explains why he readded "large number" term, deleted <fact> tag despite no citations from the HRW and Memorial Human Rights Center provided etc (he tried to explain only why he deleted some links which he marks as "hysteric"). I request that the entry be reverted to the last edit by Pocopocopocopoco or some reasonable variation. Andranikpasha 10:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Fulfilled/denied requests
J. K. Rowling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. There seems to be a consistent amount of IP vandalism. Eagle Owl 16:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. IP vandalism was significant and ongoing, while constructive IP edits were virtually non-existent. Article has been semi-protected three times in last four months, most recently for four weeks. -- Satori Son 17:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect: This page is a vandalism magnet that requires repeated reverts several times a day. Very few of the resulting edits are beneficial to the page. Mu understanding is that the FA'd Earth page has been semi-protected several times already, without alleviating the vandalism. Please consider an indefinite semi-protection status. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 8 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; complete lack of productive IP edits. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Rock of Love with Bret Michaels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect: IPs constantly adding unverified information and testing the table when the consensus has been reached to format the table in the current state. Miranda 15:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Many good edits coming through from anons, don't want to filter those out. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- The IPs can sign up for an account. Also, there is unverified information being constantly inserted into the article. For example, episode 12 which hasn't even aired yet has a full summary. You can revert the unverified information, because this article isn't worth my time anymore since most of the information is unverified. Miranda 15:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- We can't force anyone to sign up for accounts. I am under no obligation to revert something because you feel it isn't 'worth your time'. Leaving for another admin's review. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- The IPs can sign up for an account. Also, there is unverified information being constantly inserted into the article. For example, episode 12 which hasn't even aired yet has a full summary. You can revert the unverified information, because this article isn't worth my time anymore since most of the information is unverified. Miranda 15:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Tundra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect: Persistent vandalism over 2 months by different anon IPs. Thanks. hike395 14:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Hurricane Felix (2007) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect: Constant vandalism by IPs. -- LaNicoya •Talk• 12:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Relatively low amount of vandalism, considering its on the main page. --DarkFalls talk 12:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Rubén Hinojosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 1 week, Unprotection, Heavy IP vandalism.Blueboy96 12:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected --DarkFalls talk 12:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Aspley State High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This page has come under a lot of vandelisim in recent weeks. Can we get this page protected from Non Regestered Users and Newly Created Accounts?
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Primal therapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full-protect: An escalating IP edit war involving clear vandalism in the form of deletions of sourced content. One registered editor stepped in and reverted a couple of the edits but really it seems to me that the best solution would be to revert all edits back to and including the latest outbreak on September 5th and give the article full-protection as this type of thing has occurred before. Other related articles that have been affected, at least by related 'spamming', in the past are Arthur Janov, Scream therapy, and The Primal Scream. Since I plugged some 'leaks' in those articles the attack has shifted back to where it began. GrahameKing 07:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined Just warn and revert the POV edits and spamming. No need for protection as yet. --DarkFalls talk 09:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protect. In order to stop edit war and bring certain editors to the discussion page who are not communicating. --Strothra 05:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected --DarkFalls talk 07:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
John F. Kennedy International Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect Over the last few days, time referenced 16:44, 1 September 2007 to present (all times UTC), there has been an edit war with regard to an airline's right to transport passengers domestically vs internationally, but I'll spare the details. In short, according to WP:Airports and US travel rules, a domestic route can not be flown by an international carrier in which passengers are permitted to purchase a ticket only for that domestic flight. Anon editors have gone on the attack. Any break in the editing may cause these users to lose interest, therefore any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. Neo16287 03:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I see a content dispute here. Please try to find a solution to the issue on the talk page. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have put a topic on this issie on the talk page. Thanks! Bucs2004 19:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
ESADE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Seems to be a crazy unnoticed edit war/controversial dispute going on. Might need full protection until such issues can get settled on the talk page. -WarthogDemon 03:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Navou banter 03:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Miles "Tails" Prower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The page has come under too much vandalism from anons. so it should be protected so that only regestered users can edit. For proof of my statement, just go ahead and check it's edit history.
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much activity the last couple of days. Navou banter 03:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Serbia (1941-1944) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. IP vandalism by sockpuppets of the banned User:Velebit. He now uses anon number code user names. He continually reposts tags for the page being biased or "totally disputed" or that it is "completely unreferenced" when it is referenced. Only this user finds bias in this article, in spite of every attempt possible in the past to reduce any such bias to a minimum. When users remove the now unneeded bias tag, "completely unrefenced and others, he responds by accusing the one who removed it for "vandalizing" the page. R-41 02:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not a good deal of activity. Navou banter 03:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Korn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. Vandalism from multiple IPs over the past few weeks. It's so tedious and annoying now Tjohnsond 02:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - please watchlist and revert. I know it's tedious, but we don't like to lock down articles until we have to. It's anti-wiki spirit (if you can say it in such a way). - Philippe | Talk 02:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Cholo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect'. Ongoing IP vandalism. Followed by reverts, generic vandalism on page request either protection or deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholo
- Semi-protected Mr.Z-man 02:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Fightin' Texas Aggie Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection - frequent vandalism by IPs. This is Today's Featured article. I humbly request protection until this is off of the main page (fixing over 60 edits in the last hour is quickly becoming cumbersome. — BQZip01 — talk 17:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The reason is persistent vandalism and no constructive edits from IP's and new accounts. Also, the pseudo-military nature of the topic could be generating extra vandalism on 9/11. Johntex\talk 18:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
2008 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection- frequent vandalism by anonymous editors. These editors keep moving unconfirmed teams to the confirmed teams section, adding drivers and sponors unconfirmed to the confirmed section, and the likewise. The page does need some citations, which are being worked on, but the constant vandalism is detering the process. Casey14 22:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
2008 Battle of Jenin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Full protection edit warring by several parties on 24h blocks for 3RR and edit warring. I've reverted the most recent edit because it deleted several citations, so rather than take an action that could be construed as POV am requesting intervention by a completely uninvolved administrator. DurovaCharge! 04:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)