Content deleted Content added
Psychonaut (talk | contribs) →User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis: tag SPA |
→User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis: Not SPA |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Try reading [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]] to see why that is not a reason for keeping, quite apart from the fact that one is an article and the other a stale draft. [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]]) 09:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC) <small>— [[User:79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
::Try reading [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]] to see why that is not a reason for keeping, quite apart from the fact that one is an article and the other a stale draft. [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]]) 09:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC) <small>— [[User:79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
||
*'''Delete''' Userspace draft of a user who has not edited since October 2010, and promotional: either of those would be good enough reasons to delete. (Over 90% of recent edits from Surturz, excluding edits to his/her user talk page, have been to say "keep" in MfD discussions, often with no reason given, at other times with totally inadequate reasons. Sometimes the only "reason" given has been attacks on the editor nominating the page for deletion.) [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]]) 09:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC) <small>— [[User:79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
*'''Delete''' Userspace draft of a user who has not edited since October 2010, and promotional: either of those would be good enough reasons to delete. (Over 90% of recent edits from Surturz, excluding edits to his/her user talk page, have been to say "keep" in MfD discussions, often with no reason given, at other times with totally inadequate reasons. Sometimes the only "reason" given has been attacks on the editor nominating the page for deletion.) [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]]) 09:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC) <small>— [[User:79.123.76.131|79.123.76.131]] ([[User talk:79.123.76.131|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/79.123.76.131|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
||
:That is simply wrong. I am a long time editor with a clean block log and have edited countless articles over the years. MfD just has my attention at the moment. -I have not made any specific allegations against anyone at MfD in the last week. Sadly the converse is not true. I think editors should be allowed to record dissenting votes without suffering ad hominem attacks in response. If you disagree then state your counter arguments. [[WP:SPA]] accusations are hardly conducive to collaboration. --[[User:Surturz|Surturz]] ([[User talk:Surturz|talk]]) 10:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:52, 6 June 2012
User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis
- User:Lwsellersjr/Lewis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Stale draft; overly (self-)promotional. Psychonaut (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Userspace draft with some references to indicate notability. Not that different in structure and better referenced than say Leo_Burnett_Worldwide. --Surturz (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Try reading WP:OTHERSTUFF to see why that is not a reason for keeping, quite apart from the fact that one is an article and the other a stale draft. 79.123.76.131 (talk) 09:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC) — 79.123.76.131 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete Userspace draft of a user who has not edited since October 2010, and promotional: either of those would be good enough reasons to delete. (Over 90% of recent edits from Surturz, excluding edits to his/her user talk page, have been to say "keep" in MfD discussions, often with no reason given, at other times with totally inadequate reasons. Sometimes the only "reason" given has been attacks on the editor nominating the page for deletion.) 79.123.76.131 (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC) — 79.123.76.131 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- That is simply wrong. I am a long time editor with a clean block log and have edited countless articles over the years. MfD just has my attention at the moment. -I have not made any specific allegations against anyone at MfD in the last week. Sadly the converse is not true. I think editors should be allowed to record dissenting votes without suffering ad hominem attacks in response. If you disagree then state your counter arguments. WP:SPA accusations are hardly conducive to collaboration. --Surturz (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)