Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by ViperSnake151; Erm, no. We don't just reopen debates because the uploader still likes the image. (TW) |
→File:German Soviet.jpg: Deleted again |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
The result of the discussion was: '''Speedy Delete''' per NFCC8, or as a blatant infringement of fair use laws.<!--Template:Ffd top-->[[Category:Archived files for deletion discussions]] This is an obvious violation of fair use, even if it's a well-meant one. This picture shows nothing that cannot be adequately explained in words, for example "There is a well-known picture of Generals from both sides having a friendly discussion over attack plans". [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 17:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC) |
The result of the discussion was: '''Speedy Delete''' per NFCC8, or as a blatant infringement of fair use laws.<!--Template:Ffd top-->[[Category:Archived files for deletion discussions]] This is an obvious violation of fair use, even if it's a well-meant one. This picture shows nothing that cannot be adequately explained in words, for example "There is a well-known picture of Generals from both sides having a friendly discussion over attack plans". [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 17:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I've restored the image, as majority of editors below see the FURationale as valid. At the very least, the discussion should be allowed to continue. I've asked Cavalry to unarchive this thread. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC) |
:I've restored the image, as majority of editors below see the FURationale as valid. At the very least, the discussion should be allowed to continue. I've asked Cavalry to unarchive this thread. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I have redeleted the image, after much thought. The close was legitimate. If Cavalry believes your complaints have merit, then he is able to restore the image himself. Leaving the image sitting around but the debate closed in the mean time is not positive. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 14:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:File:German Soviet.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:[[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 11#File:German Soviet.jpg]]}}}} delete] | [[File talk:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Piotrus#File:German Soviet.jpg listed for deletion|Piotrus]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Piotrus|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Piotrus|contribs]]). |
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:File:German Soviet.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:[[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 11#File:German Soviet.jpg]]}}}} delete] | [[File talk:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:German Soviet.jpg}}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Piotrus#File:German Soviet.jpg listed for deletion|Piotrus]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Piotrus|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Piotrus|contribs]]). |
||
*Clearly unwarranted image. Yes, maybe the meeting was important, but what it looked like is not. We do not need a non-free image to know what men holding paper looked like. The copy-paste rationales are completely unilluminating, and fail to explain anything. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
*Clearly unwarranted image. Yes, maybe the meeting was important, but what it looked like is not. We do not need a non-free image to know what men holding paper looked like. The copy-paste rationales are completely unilluminating, and fail to explain anything. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:48, 13 July 2009
July 11
File:Srinivas G Phani.jpg
File:Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.jpg
- Disavian ( | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned non-free image. Orphaned by myself as only use was in Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate which was an article on the rivalry, not the book and was thus clearly contrary to NFCC 1 and 8. CIreland (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Images like this should be tagged {{subst:orfud}} and don't need to be listed here. Stifle (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Playgirlatkinscover.jpg
- Fallout boy ( | contribs). - uploaded by
- Two images have been added since the Playgirl cover was uploaded in 2005. The fair use rationale is no longer valid. APK that's not my name 18:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Alania 10 12.png
File:Nazi-SovietRelations Six.png
- Mosedschurte ( | contribs). - uploaded by
- Contains non-free elements. As a decorative image, this should be replaced with a completely free image, or at least have the non-free elements cut. J Milburn (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- keep - as the page clearly explains, the image is not "decorative" and the proper tags are included with each image. There is no problem.Mosedschurte (talk) 20:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- FIXED - To solve the problem, I just replaced the one non-free image within the file with a free image here. Note, this was after this deletion request was started.Mosedschurte (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The problem was fixed by Mosedschurte.Biophys (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Issue resolved, consider nomination withdrawn. J Milburn (talk) 22:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep good to hear issues was resolved--Jacurek (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Sailor sculpture (Kirkland, Washington) crop.jpg
- Ed Fitzgerald ( | contribs). - uploaded by
- If non-free, this image is not justified. This particular statue is not even mentioned in the article. J Milburn (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- This should be used in a different article. Do we have something about soldiers returning home from war? WhisperToMe (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I am considering having this image used at Leave (U.S. military), since this portrays a soldier home. This one can definately be used at I think this statue can represent the significance of a soldier returning home, as that is what many soldiers do when they are on leave. This one can definately be used at Lake Washington Shipyard since, according to the file description, this commemorates the shipbuilding at the shipyard. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note - I altered the FU rationale so it applies to the shipyard article. I would categorize this as a Keep since I made the FU rationale acceptable. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)