81.157.196.212 (talk) →Image:Jersey £1.jpg: clarify my own request |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This is a test case (one of many similar images, none of them uploaded by me). This image, of a Jersey coin, was deleted with the note "CSD I7: Bad justification given for fair use and the uploader was notified more than 48 hours ago". It seems to me that either we ''do'' allow images of coins in copyright, or we ''don't''. The justification will essentially be identical for all of them. Assuming we ''do'' allow coin images, it is in my view unhelpful to delete them just because the uploader didn't happen to get the exact form of wording that would satisfy a copyright lawyer. Since the deleter knew that that justification was inadequate, presumably he or she also knows the correct form of wording to use. It would be much more helpful, and just as quick (probably quicker), for that person to retain the image and simply copy and paste a standard form of wording into the rationale. I propose therefore that this image (and others similar, which I will identify) are reinstated, and that a standard form of wording is copied and pasted as justification for use. Matt 11:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC). |
This is a test case (one of many similar images, none of them uploaded by me). This image, of a Jersey coin, was deleted with the note "CSD I7: Bad justification given for fair use and the uploader was notified more than 48 hours ago". It seems to me that either we ''do'' allow images of coins in copyright, or we ''don't''. The justification will essentially be identical for all of them. Assuming we ''do'' allow coin images, it is in my view unhelpful to delete them just because the uploader didn't happen to get the exact form of wording that would satisfy a copyright lawyer. Since the deleter knew that that justification was inadequate, presumably he or she also knows the correct form of wording to use. It would be much more helpful, and just as quick (probably quicker), for that person to retain the image and simply copy and paste a standard form of wording into the rationale. I propose therefore that this image (and others similar, which I will identify) are reinstated, and that a standard form of wording is copied and pasted as justification for use. Matt 11:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC). |
||
====[[:Corey_Worthington]]==== |
====[[:Corey_Worthington]] (closed)==== |
||
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;" |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal; text-align:left;" | |
|||
* '''[[:Corey_Worthington]]''' – Redirect created for both [[Corey Delaney]] and [[Corey Worthington]] to [[Big Brother Australia 2008]] as presumably uncontroversial (only article on Wikipedia he is mentioned it), notwithstanding an "allow recreation" decision at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 7]] which would obviously overrule it. Pages to remain protected. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel|talk]]) 12:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the article above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" | |
|||
:{{la|Corey_Worthington}} <tt>(</tt>[[Special:Undelete/Corey_Worthington|restore]]<tt>|</tt><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:{{fullurl:Corey_Worthington}} cache]</span><tt>|</tt>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey_Worthington|AfD]]<tt>)</tt> |
:{{la|Corey_Worthington}} <tt>(</tt>[[Special:Undelete/Corey_Worthington|restore]]<tt>|</tt><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:{{fullurl:Corey_Worthington}} cache]</span><tt>|</tt>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey_Worthington|AfD]]<tt>)</tt> |
||
Line 24: | Line 32: | ||
** Shame the talk page for the discussed article has been locked too, I was going to put a note about the current discussion there for anyone else that stumbles across it. Looks like they will have to find it the hard way too. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] ([[User talk:JayKeaton|talk]]) 08:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
** Shame the talk page for the discussed article has been locked too, I was going to put a note about the current discussion there for anyone else that stumbles across it. Looks like they will have to find it the hard way too. [[User:JayKeaton|JayKeaton]] ([[User talk:JayKeaton|talk]]) 08:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*Sure, '''recreate redirect''' but '''keep protected'''. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 08:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
*Sure, '''recreate redirect''' but '''keep protected'''. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 08:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
|- |
|||
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archive of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the page listed in the heading. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>'' |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 12:23, 16 May 2008
16 May 2008
Image:Jersey £1.jpg
- Image:Jersey £1.jpg (edit | [[Talk:Image:Jersey £1.jpg|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)
This is a test case (one of many similar images, none of them uploaded by me). This image, of a Jersey coin, was deleted with the note "CSD I7: Bad justification given for fair use and the uploader was notified more than 48 hours ago". It seems to me that either we do allow images of coins in copyright, or we don't. The justification will essentially be identical for all of them. Assuming we do allow coin images, it is in my view unhelpful to delete them just because the uploader didn't happen to get the exact form of wording that would satisfy a copyright lawyer. Since the deleter knew that that justification was inadequate, presumably he or she also knows the correct form of wording to use. It would be much more helpful, and just as quick (probably quicker), for that person to retain the image and simply copy and paste a standard form of wording into the rationale. I propose therefore that this image (and others similar, which I will identify) are reinstated, and that a standard form of wording is copied and pasted as justification for use. Matt 11:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC).
Corey_Worthington (closed)
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This person was part of a national television program so his name should redirect to the article for which he is famous for (Big_Brother_Australia_2008) JayKeaton (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |