Content deleted Content added
GorillaWarfare (talk | contribs) m fix wl |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*There is no reason for this page to be deleted. I have not found any wrong or erroneous information. Why is this page up for deletion? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Stevenola|Stevenola]] ([[User talk:Stevenola#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevenola|contribs]]) 04:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*There is no reason for this page to be deleted. I have not found any wrong or erroneous information. Why is this page up for deletion? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Stevenola|Stevenola]] ([[User talk:Stevenola#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevenola|contribs]]) 04:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
*:{{re|Stevenola}} Wikipedia is not an [[WP:IINFO|indiscriminate collection]] of information, and article subjects must be sufficiently [[WP:N|notable]] for an article to exist. Feel free to peruse the comments above for various concerns editors have with this article. [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small> 04:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC) |
*:{{re|Stevenola}} Wikipedia is not an [[WP:IINFO|indiscriminate collection]] of information, and article subjects must be sufficiently [[WP:N|notable]] for an article to exist. Feel free to peruse the comments above for various concerns editors have with this article. [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] <small>[[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]]</small> 04:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
*Just so everyone knows, the article has been edited since this discussion began, with content including the summary of findings and links to other articles deleted. Plus, comments above are clearly biased. That really doesn't matter, though, because the findings have already been released. Suppressing them on Wikipedia won't erase them. [[User:Pkeets|Pkeets]] ([[User talk:Pkeets|talk]]) 06:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:12, 26 November 2020
Voter Integrity Fund
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voter Integrity Fund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a grouping of various pro-Trump individuals who came together after Joe Biden won the 2020 election and who are trying to substantiate Trump's baseless election fraud claims. The group has no notability aside from being covered in relation to this one event in the last two weeks. The long-term relevance of the group is unclear. The level of stability and organization of the group is also unclear. The "group" may disappear in one week, it may fragment etc. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Trump's claims are not baseless if there actually is fraud. This group includes notable people and is providing some of the evidence everyone has been requesting related to lawsuits the Trump team has/will be filing, including numerous instances of absentee ballots not requested and absentee ballots not recorded after return, plus affidavits from defrauded voters. The group is also reporting numerous absentee ballots requested through illegal post office box and commercial addresses and instances of voting in two states. Braynard says in his report that it's informing the lawsuits that are being filed this week, and the scope of the investigation is something of a landmark, regardless of the lawsuits' success. (See video report and upcoming white paper.) Information on the organization, its operation and its goals is from several highly reliable mainstream sources. Pkeets (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. We don't publish Wikipedia articles about things we think may become notable, and the coverage in RS is far insufficient at the current moment. As for the comment that
Trump's claims are not baseless if there actually is fraud
, my claims that there are little green men piloting a very convincing Trump mech-suit are not baseless if that's actually the case, but we certainly don't write articles about it, even if I promise to provide proof of the claim at some later date. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for now - at the moment the sourcing is inadequate for this group. PhilKnight (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - In nominating articles for deletion, WP:NPOV guidelines should control. The political opinions and assertions of individual users is moot and irrelevant when it comes to determining whether an article satisfies Wikipedia guidelines or not. That said, it seems questionable to me whether this article currently meets WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:NTEMP. aNubiSIII (T / C) 16:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Move/Discuss Could be incorporated into the 2020 Election article, doesn't seem to be important enough by itself. Would seem to be an organization looking for evidence of something that hasn't happened. Oaktree b (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a non-notable front group for the Trump Campaign, what little information exists on it should probably be moved to List_of_conspiracy_theories_promoted_by_Donald_Trump along with Stop the Steal. IHateAccounts (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – no sign of actual notability; if there should be significant and sustained media coverage about this, an article can be created in six months or a year or whenever, but at the moment WP:ORGDEPTH is not met, and WP:NOTNEWS would also seem to apply. --bonadea contributions talk 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete/merge to Disputes surrounding the 2020 United States presidential election results. We don't need an article on all of Trump's lies. Reywas92Talk 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete or (as a second choice) very selectively merge/redirect to List_of_conspiracy_theories_promoted_by_Donald_Trump. I don't see the sourcing as significant and in-depth coverage, particularly for an independent article; the various falsehoods and conspiracy theories promoted by Trump and allies can be covered elsewhere. Neutralitytalk 18:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- There is no reason for this page to be deleted. I have not found any wrong or erroneous information. Why is this page up for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenola (talk • contribs) 04:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Stevenola: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and article subjects must be sufficiently notable for an article to exist. Feel free to peruse the comments above for various concerns editors have with this article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Just so everyone knows, the article has been edited since this discussion began, with content including the summary of findings and links to other articles deleted. Plus, comments above are clearly biased. That really doesn't matter, though, because the findings have already been released. Suppressing them on Wikipedia won't erase them. Pkeets (talk) 06:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)