Content deleted Content added
Lilac Soul (talk | contribs) It's a speedy |
I brought it here instead of speedying it for several reasons |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|list of Organizations-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Comment''' I've slapped a speedy tag on the article as it was a blatant copyright infringement copied directly from [http://www.stpaulslutheranchurchandschool.org/church/HTML/index_files/History.htm the church's website]. -<span id="Lilac Soul" class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8">[[User:Lilac Soul|Lilac Soul]] <sup>([[User talk:Lilac Soul|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Lilac Soul|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:Lilac Soul}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>])</span></sup> 19:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I've slapped a speedy tag on the article as it was a blatant copyright infringement copied directly from [http://www.stpaulslutheranchurchandschool.org/church/HTML/index_files/History.htm the church's website]. -<span id="Lilac Soul" class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8">[[User:Lilac Soul|Lilac Soul]] <sup>([[User talk:Lilac Soul|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Lilac Soul|contribs]] <small>•</small> [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:Lilac Soul}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en <span style="color:#002bb8">count</span>])</span></sup> 19:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I brought it here instead of speedying it for several reasons: (1) the church doesn't assert copyright on its website, (2) on the expectation that an inexperienced user will try to recreate the article, an AfD provides a much more thorough documentary record of the issues with the article so they are less likely to be repeated, (3) the content has been there for more than a year without anyone noticing it (in part because the article is orphaned and uncategorized), so a few more days shouldn't hurt. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 19:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:43, 17 February 2009
St. Paul's Lutheran Church and School
- St. Paul's Lutheran Church and School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Local church and associated school lacking any suggestion of notability. Article is almost entirely copy-pasted from the church website: this page. (The only part that's not copy-pasted seems to be the lead sentence that I added to indicate what the article is about.) Article is unreferenced and an orphan. Additionally, the school has its own separate article at St. Paul's Lutheran School.--Orlady (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Orlady (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Orlady (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I've slapped a speedy tag on the article as it was a blatant copyright infringement copied directly from the church's website. -Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 19:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I brought it here instead of speedying it for several reasons: (1) the church doesn't assert copyright on its website, (2) on the expectation that an inexperienced user will try to recreate the article, an AfD provides a much more thorough documentary record of the issues with the article so they are less likely to be repeated, (3) the content has been there for more than a year without anyone noticing it (in part because the article is orphaned and uncategorized), so a few more days shouldn't hurt. --Orlady (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)