Content deleted Content added
Hanuman Das (talk | contribs) self-revert, thought better of changing another's words :-( bad H.D.) |
→[[Philip H. Farber]]: delete |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Keep''', per several. [[User:Atlant|Atlant]] 22:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', per several. [[User:Atlant|Atlant]] 22:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[User:999|999]] and [[User:Geoffspear|Geoffspear]]. —[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 23:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[User:999|999]] and [[User:Geoffspear|Geoffspear]]. —[[User:Hanuman Das|Hanuman Das]] 23:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per [[User:Wikipediatrix|wikipediatrix]] as lacking proof of author's notability through verifiable reliable sources. Footnotes 1 & 2 in the article go to New York Times best seller lists that do not mention his name or his books. Footnote 3 goes to his personal website. Footnote 4 goes to Maybe Logic academy faculty where he is listed as a faculty member. Footnote 5 goes to Starwood Festival 2005 list of speakers where he is listed as a speaker. The Reference section is a repeat of the last 3 footnotes. [[User:GBYork|GBYork]] 14:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:36, 22 August 2006
Philip H. Farber
Interested party removed prod (see article history) claiming author was notable but without adding sources to article. As of now his main claim to notability is that he has been a frequent presenter at the Starwood Festival and WinterStar Symposium, run by the Association for Consciousness Exploration. You guys decide. Mattisse(talk) 18:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note - nominator has an active complaint against him from two parties on WP:AN/I for inappropriate tagging, prodding, etc. over two separate vendettas he is conducting -999 (Talk) 18:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - published author whose works are listed in article and are available from Amazon.com -999
- My Aunt's cookbook is available from Amazon also, but that doesn't make her notable. Amazon will sell anything if you slap a bar code on it. wikipediatrix (Talk) 18:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I'd say being frequently asked to be a presenter at two fairly large neo-pagan gatherings makes him notable enough in his area of expertise. His published works look verifiable to me, too.-Geoffrey Spear 18:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Borderline but ultimately non-notable writer. wikipediatrix 19:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep published author. Presenter at organizations with articles already? What's the issue? Keep this one. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 19:59, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per Wikipediatrix. Only generates like 760 hits on Google. --Nishkid64 20:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Slightly meets a criteria of BIO. Allow for expansion. SynergeticMaggot 20:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Which criteria? How slightly? wikipediatrix 21:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, per several. Atlant 22:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per 999 and Geoffspear. —Hanuman Das 23:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per wikipediatrix as lacking proof of author's notability through verifiable reliable sources. Footnotes 1 & 2 in the article go to New York Times best seller lists that do not mention his name or his books. Footnote 3 goes to his personal website. Footnote 4 goes to Maybe Logic academy faculty where he is listed as a faculty member. Footnote 5 goes to Starwood Festival 2005 list of speakers where he is listed as a speaker. The Reference section is a repeat of the last 3 footnotes. GBYork 14:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)