Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
TheLongTone (talk | contribs) →Murder of Riley Ann Sawyers: format. |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Keep''', notability demonstrated by sources. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] ([[User talk:Everyking|talk]]) 06:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', notability demonstrated by sources. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] ([[User talk:Everyking|talk]]) 06:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Absolute keep'''—and the demonstrable lack of AGF in the nom is disturbing ... 🖖[[User:ATS|<span style="font-family:times;font-size:110%;color:#083884;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px">ATS</span>]] <b>/</b> [[User talk:ATS|<span style="font-family:times;color:#373;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px">Talk</span>]] |
*'''Absolute keep'''—and the demonstrable lack of AGF in the nom is disturbing ... 🖖[[User:ATS|<span style="font-family:times;font-size:110%;color:#083884;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px">ATS</span>]] <b>/</b> [[User talk:ATS|<span style="font-family:times;color:#373;text-shadow:1px 1px 1px">Talk</span>]] |
||
: What is lack of good faith in thinking that people who are obsessively interested in even the dullest murder case have a problem? (I'm far too polite to say they are sickos). The canvassing is disturbing as well. |
|||
:Of course this ''got'' coverage: it's the kind of story that provides the yellow press with what sells their product. ''Lasting'' coverage is what is needed to establish notability.[[User:TheLongTone|TheLongTone]] ([[User talk:TheLongTone|talk]]) 12:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:57, 14 June 2016
Murder of Riley Ann Sawyers
- Murder of Riley Ann Sawyers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tragic, yes. But entirely run-of-the-mill murder. WP:NOTNEWS. IMO the editor who obsessivlt create these aericlees have a problem. TheLongTone (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: the Riley Ann Sawyers ("Baby Grace") murder is pretty well known and got national attention and coverage. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Strong keep The case received national attention and has quite a bit of notability. My first thought when seeing this nomination was ...really?--GouramiWatcherTalk 03:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- note to closing admin this vote was clearly canvassed [1]. LibStar (talk) 08:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Per WP:Canvassing, the notification was appropriate due to my experience with creating and editing articles of the same topic. I also experienced multiple AFD debates after a certain editor nominated several pages on this topic.--GouramiWatcherTalk 11:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- given your strong interest in the topic don't you always vote keep? Paul Austin has only contacted people that are known to vote keep. LibStar (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, notability demonstrated by sources. Everyking (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Absolute keep—and the demonstrable lack of AGF in the nom is disturbing ... 🖖ATS / Talk
- What is lack of good faith in thinking that people who are obsessively interested in even the dullest murder case have a problem? (I'm far too polite to say they are sickos). The canvassing is disturbing as well.
- Of course this got coverage: it's the kind of story that provides the yellow press with what sells their product. Lasting coverage is what is needed to establish notability.TheLongTone (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)