Content deleted Content added
ZabMilenko (talk | contribs) →MiG 42 Foxglove: comment |
Comments |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' - per nom. If it is from a game, there's no need for a whole article on a fictional aircraft from a minor game. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 03:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - per nom. If it is from a game, there's no need for a whole article on a fictional aircraft from a minor game. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 03:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:*'''Comment''' yes but we have [[Fictional military aircraft]] which can easily be the target of a redirect. '''[[User:ZabMilenko|Zab]]'''''[[User:ZabMilenko|Milenko]]'' 06:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
:*'''Comment''' yes but we have [[Fictional military aircraft]] which can easily be the target of a redirect. '''[[User:ZabMilenko|Zab]]'''''[[User:ZabMilenko|Milenko]]'' 06:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
***That has nothing to do with my point. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] ([[User talk:BillCJ|talk]]) 06:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' as totally in-universe. [[User:Majoreditor|Majoreditor]] ([[User talk:Majoreditor|talk]]) 03:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as totally in-universe. [[User:Majoreditor|Majoreditor]] ([[User talk:Majoreditor|talk]]) 03:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' (for now) Per this link at http://www.military.cz/russia/air/mig/Mig-42/mig-42.htm. More research is needed.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 05:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' (for now) Per this link at http://www.military.cz/russia/air/mig/Mig-42/mig-42.htm. More research is needed.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 05:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:28, 28 May 2009
MiG 42 Foxglove
- MiG 42 Foxglove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There is no "MiG 42 Foxglove." The article references a speculative website dating to 1997, not a reliable source. The aircraft in question is probably what became the Mikoyan Project 1.44. At best, it's a redirect. Contested PROD. Acroterion (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Might it be "in-universe" writing for the game Ninjas_and_Superspies? [1] Gigs (talk) 01:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Conceivably so. Acroterion (talk) 01:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- However, based on my conversations with the editor who created it, I believe he's sincerely convinced it's a real airplane. Acroterion (talk)
- Delete - per nom. If it is from a game, there's no need for a whole article on a fictional aircraft from a minor game. - BillCJ (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment yes but we have Fictional military aircraft which can easily be the target of a redirect. ZabMilenko 06:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as totally in-universe. Majoreditor (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep (for now) Per this link at http://www.military.cz/russia/air/mig/Mig-42/mig-42.htm. More research is needed.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- The link at the bottom of that page under Zdroje (Czech for "Resources") goes to a "Ninja & Superspies" site. It's a fictional aircraft - no modern combat aircraft is capable of Mach 5! - BillCJ (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Merge somewhere close to Fictional_military_aircraft#MiG-37 if notability can be established, otherwise delete. For the record, I should mention this. If the fictional craft appeared in two different games (Jetfighter 1998 and Ninjas and Superspies 1988) that might be enough for a paragraph in the list. ZabMilenko 06:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)