No edit summary |
I see. One person crusade |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::I believe the burden is on you to prove that there IS a guideline. In the meantime, how many ambassador articles HAVE been deleted? List them. Seriously. Community consensus can be wrong. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 03:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
::::I believe the burden is on you to prove that there IS a guideline. In the meantime, how many ambassador articles HAVE been deleted? List them. Seriously. Community consensus can be wrong. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 03:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
similarly I could argue all police sargents are notable. There is no guideline which says that but using your logic the fact it isn't stated gives it inherent notability. Community consensus can be wrong? sorry that's how WP works. Here's a list of some that have been deleted [[User:LibStar#Apparently_some_people_still_think_ambassadors_are_inherently_notable.3F]]. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 03:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
similarly I could argue all police sargents are notable. There is no guideline which says that but using your logic the fact it isn't stated gives it inherent notability. Community consensus can be wrong? sorry that's how WP works. Here's a list of some that have been deleted [[User:LibStar#Apparently_some_people_still_think_ambassadors_are_inherently_notable.3F]]. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 03:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
*Now you are using a false equivalency. Looks to me like you are just on your own little one-person crusade here. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 04:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)</small> |
<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 04:41, 13 May 2015
Margaret Adamson
- Margaret Adamson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Marked for notability concerns 2 years ago. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. The sources merely confirm she held roles. LibStar (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: I see nothing in WP:GNG to state that "Ambassadors are not inherently notable." An ambassadorship is clear evidence of notability. Seriously, we keep articles on football players who played one season of professional sports in 1987. An ambassador, particularly where there are multiple third-party sources, is clearly notable. Montanabw(talk) 16:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- ambassadors are not inherently notable , several have been deleted. Your !vote demonstrates no explanation how WP:BIO is met. LibStar (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- That's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. I see NOTHING in either WP:GNG or WP:BIO that discusses notability of ambassadors. If you have an actual guideline you are working from, then please point it out here. Montanabw(talk) 20:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- ambassadors are not inherently notable , several have been deleted. Your !vote demonstrates no explanation how WP:BIO is met. LibStar (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
if an ambassador is clear evidence of notability that would be listed in WP:BIO which it isn't, many occupations get inherent notability but ambassadors are not mentioned. Please point out a notability guideline which gives ambassadors inherent notability and I'll withdraw these AfD. Ambassador articles have been deleted which shows community consensus that ambassador are not inherently notable, now please demonstrate how this person actually meets WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
similarly I could argue all police sargents are notable. There is no guideline which says that but using your logic the fact it isn't stated gives it inherent notability. Community consensus can be wrong? sorry that's how WP works. Here's a list of some that have been deleted User:LibStar#Apparently_some_people_still_think_ambassadors_are_inherently_notable.3F. LibStar (talk) 03:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Now you are using a false equivalency. Looks to me like you are just on your own little one-person crusade here. Montanabw(talk) 04:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- if someone is arguing inherent notability, the burden is on them to point out the relevant guideline, if you can't then your inherent notability argument is Void. We have inherent notability for state and federal politicians, Olympians and so on but nothing for ambassadors. LibStar (talk) 03:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)