Content deleted Content added
Bucuresti23 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''delete''' Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia lists are for organizing information in wikipedia. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem|talk]]) 20:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC) |
*'''delete''' Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia lists are for organizing information in wikipedia. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem|talk]]) 20:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Would appear to go against [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]] and [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]. Describing the process of the 3-D rendering in general may be of sufficient weight in related articles, but not listing every instance for a standalone article. This would especially become the case as this becomes more common rather than a rarity. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 05:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Would appear to go against [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]] and [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]. Describing the process of the 3-D rendering in general may be of sufficient weight in related articles, but not listing every instance for a standalone article. This would especially become the case as this becomes more common rather than a rarity. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 05:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I made references for Buenos Aires, Timisoara, Sibiu, London. [[User:Unguriu|Unguriu]] ([[User talk:Unguriu|talk]]) 18:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:48, 17 February 2016
List of 3D cities in Google Earth
- List of 3D cities in Google Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This long list of cities is ultimately unsourced, and can only be sourced through actual research (which Wikipedia doesn't do) of the very subject: this means, namely, launching Google Earth and studying which places have 3D buildings and which do not. A reliable secondary source informing us in a feasibly verifiable manner does not seem to be available (except possibly for a KML outline which may pose similar problems as Google Earth itself). The subject itself may not be notable in the first place outside of the already-covered subject of Google Earth, and including it there may be giving this aspect of the software a highly WP:UNDUE weight. See also Talk:Google Earth. LjL (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. LjL (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. LjL (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. LjL (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. LjL (talk) 02:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- delete Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia lists are for organizing information in wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Would appear to go against WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Describing the process of the 3-D rendering in general may be of sufficient weight in related articles, but not listing every instance for a standalone article. This would especially become the case as this becomes more common rather than a rarity. Kingofaces43 (talk) 05:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I made references for Buenos Aires, Timisoara, Sibiu, London. Unguriu (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)