Content deleted Content added
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*'''Keep''' I want to bring it to your attention that this user Pocoproco is a politicized user with certain agenda on Wikipedia. This attempt to delete the article is an indication of POV pushing due to political convictions this user has. This article has valid sources (taken from UN news pages, etc). I also made it more NPOV yesterday, but even that was not enough for this politicized user. This page should be protected. [[User:MIGAbkhazeti|MIGAbkhazeti]] 16:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I want to bring it to your attention that this user Pocoproco is a politicized user with certain agenda on Wikipedia. This attempt to delete the article is an indication of POV pushing due to political convictions this user has. This article has valid sources (taken from UN news pages, etc). I also made it more NPOV yesterday, but even that was not enough for this politicized user. This page should be protected. [[User:MIGAbkhazeti|MIGAbkhazeti]] 16:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' I reviewed all references and they all support the article. Its in no way propaganda but a realistic political campaign. [http://www.unomig.org/media/headlines/?id=8937&y=2007&m=8&d=14]. [[User:Taton80|Taton80]] 16:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I reviewed all references and they all support the article. Its in no way propaganda but a realistic political campaign. [http://www.unomig.org/media/headlines/?id=8937&y=2007&m=8&d=14]. [[User:Taton80|Taton80]] 16:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Again, supported with sources and in total compliance with encyclopedic content and NPOV. This is clearly a political pushing which is very destructive for Wikipedia productivity. [[User:Iberieli|Iberieli]] 21:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:01, 27 August 2007
Kokoity Fandarast
- Kokoity Fandarast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete - Fails WP:Notability. Article describes a propaganda campaign by the Georgian government yet there are no non-Georgian sources available. Article is inherently POV. Article will likely never present the opposing viewpoint. - Pocopocopocopoco 03:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a real movement: [1] [2] and while the article is propaganda now it's our job as editors to fix things like this, not delete them. Calibas 04:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Response - The two sources you provided describe Dmitry_Sanakoyev and the South Ossetian Provisional Administration for which there are already articles. This "Fandarast" movement is not described in those sources. Pocopocopocopoco 04:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a real movement and has earned an international attention. The campaign is not conducted by the Georgian government as claimed by Poco, but by an alliance of Georgian and Ossetian NGOs. I'm afraid this is a bad faith nomination by the user with a strong anti-Georgian POV. --KoberTalk 04:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Response - Please don't resort to ad hominem arguments, would you have any non-Georgian sources to support your claims? Pocopocopocopoco 04:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- [3] and [4] for example.--KoberTalk 04:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- The first source doesn't mention anything about Fandarast. Pocopocopocopoco 03:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I confused two South Ossetia articles by EurasiaNet. Try this one.--KoberTalk 05:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's the same article author as the tol.cz article. So we've got one non-Georgian source. Hardly international attention but you might be able to convince me that the content of the article could be redirected and merged with The_Salvation_Union_of_South_Ossetia and dePOV'd. After all, the title translates to "Goodbye Kokoity" which is inherently POV. Pocopocopocopoco 02:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I confused two South Ossetia articles by EurasiaNet. Try this one.--KoberTalk 05:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- The first source doesn't mention anything about Fandarast. Pocopocopocopoco 03:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep What's wrong with Georgian sources for something from Georgia? If the nominator wants to put an 'opposing view' in the article he can do that. Nick mallory 07:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Response - This is the equivalent of having an article titled "Goodbye George Bush" and only citing Democratic party loyal sources and having no other sources available. Pocopocopocopoco 16:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep sources have been provided - enough with your deletionist agenda. Fosnez 14:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I want to bring it to your attention that this user Pocoproco is a politicized user with certain agenda on Wikipedia. This attempt to delete the article is an indication of POV pushing due to political convictions this user has. This article has valid sources (taken from UN news pages, etc). I also made it more NPOV yesterday, but even that was not enough for this politicized user. This page should be protected. MIGAbkhazeti 16:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I reviewed all references and they all support the article. Its in no way propaganda but a realistic political campaign. [6]. Taton80 16:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Again, supported with sources and in total compliance with encyclopedic content and NPOV. This is clearly a political pushing which is very destructive for Wikipedia productivity. Iberieli 21:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)