Content deleted Content added
Nonmodernist (talk | contribs) vote keep Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[:Ashley C. Ford]]=== |
===[[:Ashley C. Ford]]=== |
||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''Snowball keep'''. [[User:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">Gamaliel</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<span style="color:DarkGreen;">talk</span>]])</small> 23:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|Ashley C. Ford}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley C. Ford|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 27#{{anchorencode:Ashley C. Ford}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashley_C._Ford Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Ashley C. Ford}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley C. Ford|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 27#{{anchorencode:Ashley C. Ford}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashley_C._Ford Stats]</span>) |
||
Line 28: | Line 33: | ||
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:ANYBIO]] as seen in the comments by XOR'easter and Trillfendi. Recent improvements to the article further demonstrate notability. [[User:Thsmi002|Thsmi002]] ([[User talk:Thsmi002|talk]]) 21:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:ANYBIO]] as seen in the comments by XOR'easter and Trillfendi. Recent improvements to the article further demonstrate notability. [[User:Thsmi002|Thsmi002]] ([[User talk:Thsmi002|talk]]) 21:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:BASIC]]. There are several reliable independent sources that establish her notability. --[[User:Nonmodernist|Nonmodernist]] ([[User talk:Nonmodernist|talk]]) 22:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:BASIC]]. There are several reliable independent sources that establish her notability. --[[User:Nonmodernist|Nonmodernist]] ([[User talk:Nonmodernist|talk]]) 22:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 23:11, 28 April 2019
Ashley C. Ford
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball keep. Gamaliel (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ashley C. Ford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure if this really meets WP:NOTABILITY. Thoughts? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability. --Tataral (talk) 20:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to see some more citations from local news sources. If she is notable and from NYC there should be a number of local articles in NY Post, NY Times, NY Daily News, NY Magazine etc.. if she is on the 30 under 30 in media on Forbes. If those citations can be established then possibly the article can be justified but if not then a delete.ScienceAdvisor (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep She seems to have some noteworthy coverage, but article needs to be expanded I feel.★Trekker (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Many sufficient sources exist to prove notability and expand the article further. I encourage a google search. Apparently this woman is relevant in every demographic from Glamour to The Guardian. Trillfendi (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Trillfendi: I don't understand "relevant in every demographic". Can you reword this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:48, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the article isn’t great but notability seems to be established well beyond question. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep the article isn’t great but notability seems to be established well beyond question. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Keep the article isn’t great but notability seems to be established well beyond question. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)- Keep Ashley C. Ford is a notable queer podcaster who has a long career ahead of her. To the main folx who worked on this article so far (looks like Sweet Kate (talk) and Koavf (talk) ) I would suggest adding content about the shows that she has worked on and what she has done on them, as well as her connections to other notable folx, movements, etc.. I will make folx on @wikilgbt and @WikiWomeninRed aware of this article so that they can help. RachelWex (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- @RachelWex:
The article doesn't even mention podcasting--where are you getting this information?―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)- The article does mention podcasting:
Ford is the host of Brooklyn-based television program and podcast 112BK
. The sources from the New York Times and PBS Newshour also discuss her podcasting work. XOR'easter (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)- That's stupid: I just misstyped the search in my browser. Either way, simply having a podcast doesn't make you notable but would have to be established with sources, of course. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- The article does mention podcasting:
- @RachelWex:
- Keep Sourcing is more than adequate to establish notability. XOR'easter (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I agree there are sufficient sources to establish notability. Megs (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:ANYBIO as seen in the comments by XOR'easter and Trillfendi. Recent improvements to the article further demonstrate notability. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:BASIC. There are several reliable independent sources that establish her notability. --Nonmodernist (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.