Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for 1966 Australian network television schedule (weekday). using TW |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|1966 Australian network television schedule (weekday)}}) |
:({{findsources|1966 Australian network television schedule (weekday)}}) |
||
[[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]] - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Previous AfDs on similar articles can be found [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1990 Australian network television schedule (weekday)|here]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1958 Australian network television schedule (weekday)| here]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)|here]]. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC) [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
[[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]] - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Previous AfDs on similar articles can be found [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1990 Australian network television schedule (weekday)|here]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1958 Australian network television schedule (weekday)| here]], [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)|here]]. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC) [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Other previous AFDs of interest include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2007_Australian_network_television_schedule this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2009_Australian_network_television_schedule_(weekday) this], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_United_States_network_television_schedules this]. So there's no clear precedent. Ultimately, the result of this debate will depend on who closes it. (And if I may say so, Backslash Forwardslash's reasoning in the debates he closed makes little sense to me. The delete voters offered little more than "Delete, indiscriminate/unencyclopedic", while keep voters like Edison and Mandsford offered much lengthier arguments, which actually ''quote'' WP:NOT.) [[User: Zagalejo|Zagalejo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 17:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:29, 26 August 2009
1966 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
- 1966 Australian network television schedule (weekday) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Previous AfDs on similar articles can be found here, here, here. Ironholds (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Other previous AFDs of interest include this, this, and this. So there's no clear precedent. Ultimately, the result of this debate will depend on who closes it. (And if I may say so, Backslash Forwardslash's reasoning in the debates he closed makes little sense to me. The delete voters offered little more than "Delete, indiscriminate/unencyclopedic", while keep voters like Edison and Mandsford offered much lengthier arguments, which actually quote WP:NOT.) Zagalejo^^^ 17:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)