→Highways 2: explanation of tagging |
80.190.200.171 (talk) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:''Add new requests to the top of the page. Old requests will be automatically archived off the bottom three days after the last time stamp''. |
:''Add new requests to the top of the page. Old requests will be automatically archived off the bottom three days after the last time stamp''. |
||
== Another Eastern European flamer == |
|||
Copied what too here is appropriate of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=181860369&oldid=181834132%20]. |
|||
{{Vandal|Space Cadet}} he is a highly ucivil editor active in discussions related to various Eastern European topics, an area which has been subject to a series of recent ArbCom rulings noting the tendency for discussions and articles involving those subjects to deteriorate into wiki-battles, and the resulting need for civility enforcement. To be more specific: in the Piotrus case (closed on 19 August 2007), editors were [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus#Parties_reminded|reminded of the need to edit courteously and cooperatively in the future under the treat of further sanctions]]. In Digwuren's case (closed on 21 October 2007), several editors were banned, and the rest were [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#Editors_warned|warned not to use Wikipedia as the battleground]] and [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction|placed under general restriction]] ("'''<u>should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below</u>'''"). |
|||
I believe that Space Cadet has constantly - for well over a year - crossed boundaries we expect our editors to keep. Below I will present a sample of his uncivil and disruptive edits that occurred since 17 November. I would argue that he need to be placed under the same restrictions specified at] [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction]]" (technical note: there is even a dedicated template for this, see {{tl|Digwuren enforcement}}). |
|||
*November 17: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brzeg&diff=prev&oldid=172082866 "revert the mess back to Molobo's"] |
|||
*November 18: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Space_Cadet&diff=prev&oldid=172187484 "Also LUCPOL, keep your tRAŚh off my Talk page."] |
|||
*November 18: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brzeg&diff=prev&oldid=172188346 "Bo to tylko twoja prawda, wandalizujący fanatyku!"] / "Because it is only your truth, fanatic vandal!" |
|||
*November 19: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Germany&diff=prev&oldid=172409891 "We all like English letters like ü, ä, ß, etc., but not Polish ones, right?"] |
|||
*November 25: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Teutonic_takeover_of_Danzig_%28Gda%C5%84sk%29&diff=prev&oldid=173696713 "You German ultranationalists only like the Gdańsk vote when it serves your purposes" and "You're new here or something? Don't play dumb on us (the Wikipedia Community) now!"] |
|||
*November 25: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Gedanian_natives&diff=prev&oldid=173697615 "Some nice ultranationalist consistency."] |
|||
*November 25: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_mayors_of_Danzig/Gda%C5%84sk&diff=prev&oldid=173702824 "rm nationalistic nonsense"] |
|||
*November 30: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Space_Cadet&diff=prev&oldid=174935714 "Stop your whining." and "poor Matthead, poor history, so brutally denied. You're such a drama king."] |
|||
*December 11: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_from_Gda%C5%84sk_%28Danzig%29&diff=prev&oldid=177201196 "Do whatever you want to your ultranationalist List of people from Danzig, but leave this neutral version alone."] |
|||
*December 15: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_from_Gda%C5%84sk_%28Danzig%29&diff=prev&oldid=178167152 "You have your own "Danzig" page, play with that, bout leave this neutral version alone."] |
|||
*January 4: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gda%C5%84sk&diff=prev&oldid=182188382 "It's in a very bad tone to use editor's personal record as an only justification for reverting him. I am highly disappointed. Grow up!"] |
|||
*January 13: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.140.114.210&diff=prev&oldid=184114728 "At Grunwald Poland actually got more help from Russians then from those wild, half-pagan, jungle people (Lithanians)." and "is the "same language" another myth you believe in?" and "Put away the myths, study the true history of your awesome nation (Lithuania) and become a constructive editor of the Wikipedia. Of course in my opinion you would have to grow up a little bit first"] |
|||
*January 17: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Duchy_of_Pless&diff=prev&oldid=185006166 "And stop using icon {{en icon}} together with your poor imitation of that language. Cheers."] |
|||
*January 18: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jan_Dzier%C5%BCon&diff=prev&oldid=185288649 "What medication are you on right now?"] |
|||
*January 18: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.140.114.210&diff=prev&oldid=185303350 "Apologies? You gotta be kidding me! YOU apologize and remove the insults and maybe I'll respond, because I already have answers to all your pseudo-arguments. You are simply afraid of the truth, that's why you turn to namecalling in lack of anything better."] |
|||
*January 18: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.140.114.210&diff=prev&oldid=185316648 "Seriously though, are you drinking right now? You are, aren't you? Maybe you should go to sleep now and apologize to me later, what do you say?"] |
|||
*January 19: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.140.114.210&diff=prev&oldid=185476378 "Too bad you cannot live without insults, we could've had a very interesting, stimulating discussion, because I'm a very well read man" and "By the time Poland brought culture to Lithuanians, they were very little more than wild, pagan, forest (here, I replaced "jungle" with "forest", are you happy now?) people, kind of like Poles were in the 9'th century"] |
|||
*January 27: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=187325526 "I said it (yellow on blue versus black on yellow or white on red), it just went over your head, so rather than inquiring for further information you blindly reverted my edit."] |
|||
*January 27: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=187338646 "shutting me up twice was rude, don't turn stuff around"] |
|||
*January 27: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=187345477 "Do you have narcissistic tendencies?"] |
|||
*January 27: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles&diff=prev&oldid=187353209 "Not at all what I expected. Hope to never encounter you again." and "First you were rude, then you tried to make me look bad, now you're threatening me. I'm outta here, it's just that judging by your edits I thought you were a different kind of person. Huge disappointment. Huge. But enough feeling sorry for myself. Good bye and I mean it."] |
|||
--[[Special:Contributions/80.190.200.171|80.190.200.171]] ([[User talk:80.190.200.171|talk]]) 09:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Highways 2 == |
== Highways 2 == |
Revision as of 09:56, 28 January 2008
Edit this section for new requests
- Add new requests to the top of the page. Old requests will be automatically archived off the bottom three days after the last time stamp.
Another Eastern European flamer
Copied what too here is appropriate of [1].
Space Cadet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) he is a highly ucivil editor active in discussions related to various Eastern European topics, an area which has been subject to a series of recent ArbCom rulings noting the tendency for discussions and articles involving those subjects to deteriorate into wiki-battles, and the resulting need for civility enforcement. To be more specific: in the Piotrus case (closed on 19 August 2007), editors were reminded of the need to edit courteously and cooperatively in the future under the treat of further sanctions. In Digwuren's case (closed on 21 October 2007), several editors were banned, and the rest were warned not to use Wikipedia as the battleground and placed under general restriction ("should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below").
I believe that Space Cadet has constantly - for well over a year - crossed boundaries we expect our editors to keep. Below I will present a sample of his uncivil and disruptive edits that occurred since 17 November. I would argue that he need to be placed under the same restrictions specified at] Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Digwuren#General_restriction" (technical note: there is even a dedicated template for this, see {{Digwuren enforcement}}).
- November 17: "revert the mess back to Molobo's"
- November 18: "Also LUCPOL, keep your tRAŚh off my Talk page."
- November 18: "Bo to tylko twoja prawda, wandalizujący fanatyku!" / "Because it is only your truth, fanatic vandal!"
- November 19: "We all like English letters like ü, ä, ß, etc., but not Polish ones, right?"
- November 25: "You German ultranationalists only like the Gdańsk vote when it serves your purposes" and "You're new here or something? Don't play dumb on us (the Wikipedia Community) now!"
- November 25: "Some nice ultranationalist consistency."
- November 25: "rm nationalistic nonsense"
- November 30: "Stop your whining." and "poor Matthead, poor history, so brutally denied. You're such a drama king."
- December 11: "Do whatever you want to your ultranationalist List of people from Danzig, but leave this neutral version alone."
- December 15: "You have your own "Danzig" page, play with that, bout leave this neutral version alone."
- January 4: "It's in a very bad tone to use editor's personal record as an only justification for reverting him. I am highly disappointed. Grow up!"
- January 13: "At Grunwald Poland actually got more help from Russians then from those wild, half-pagan, jungle people (Lithanians)." and "is the "same language" another myth you believe in?" and "Put away the myths, study the true history of your awesome nation (Lithuania) and become a constructive editor of the Wikipedia. Of course in my opinion you would have to grow up a little bit first"
- January 17: "And stop using icon Template:En icon together with your poor imitation of that language. Cheers."
- January 18: "What medication are you on right now?"
- January 18: "Apologies? You gotta be kidding me! YOU apologize and remove the insults and maybe I'll respond, because I already have answers to all your pseudo-arguments. You are simply afraid of the truth, that's why you turn to namecalling in lack of anything better."
- January 18: "Seriously though, are you drinking right now? You are, aren't you? Maybe you should go to sleep now and apologize to me later, what do you say?"
- January 19: "Too bad you cannot live without insults, we could've had a very interesting, stimulating discussion, because I'm a very well read man" and "By the time Poland brought culture to Lithuanians, they were very little more than wild, pagan, forest (here, I replaced "jungle" with "forest", are you happy now?) people, kind of like Poles were in the 9'th century"
- January 27: "I said it (yellow on blue versus black on yellow or white on red), it just went over your head, so rather than inquiring for further information you blindly reverted my edit."
- January 27: "shutting me up twice was rude, don't turn stuff around"
- January 27: "Do you have narcissistic tendencies?"
- January 27: "Not at all what I expected. Hope to never encounter you again." and "First you were rude, then you tried to make me look bad, now you're threatening me. I'm outta here, it's just that judging by your edits I thought you were a different kind of person. Huge disappointment. Huge. But enough feeling sorry for myself. Good bye and I mean it."
--80.190.200.171 (talk) 09:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Highways 2
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2: Does this violate the temporary injunction? --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- It just looks to me like the editor created subpages for the project for things like participants. I don't see how this is a change in scope or approach; please explain further if you think so. Dmcdevit·t 03:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, the page move - is that a scope change? --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Here is the page move. In the first Highways case, the issue was a dispute over preferred terminology between "Roads" and "Highways." Is that also an issue in the current case? If so, then the move should be reverted. If you can point to a section of the evidence page or parties' statements showing that terminology is once again part of the dispute, that would help. If no other admin picks up on this, I will come back to it tonight. Thatcher 13:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeesh that's a lot of moves. The moves definitely expands the scope of the Pennsylvania Wikiproject, (as does this series of edits, as "roads" is a larger set that includes "State highways" as a subset. If you want to get technical about the language, the injunction prohibits change the scope of USRD or of adding disputed cases to USRD or its subprojects, but does not prohibit changing the scope of the subprojects. This seems nonsensical to me. If there is a dispute about whether a certain stretch of pavement should be included in a "Highways" project, surely renaming the project to "Roads" completely changing the playing field of the dispute. On the other hand, no one else has edited the PASH in almost 3 months, so there is hardly an active dispute about the scope of the PA project. Does this intersect in some way with USRD so that the moves have a more significant impact than it appears? Thatcher 04:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Here is the page move. In the first Highways case, the issue was a dispute over preferred terminology between "Roads" and "Highways." Is that also an issue in the current case? If so, then the move should be reverted. If you can point to a section of the evidence page or parties' statements showing that terminology is once again part of the dispute, that would help. If no other admin picks up on this, I will come back to it tonight. Thatcher 13:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, the page move - is that a scope change? --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Highways 2 - again
[2] violated the injunction. --NE2 05:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Reverted and notified. Thatcher 13:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Resolved requests
- These issues have been resolved, and will be automatically archived after three days. Do not post in this section. Add new reports to the top section of the page. If you wish to continue a discussion that has been marked as resolved, please contact the administrator who marked it closed.